Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Processor N150

Intel Processor N97

► remove from comparison Intel N97

The Intel Processor N97 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance should be between the Intel Processor N100 and Intel Processor N200 and clearly below the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. 

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at 1200 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N97 has a base power consumption of 12 W and therefore double the amount of the N100. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N150

► remove from comparison Intel Processor N150

The Intel Processor N150 is the slowest mobile processor of the Twin Lake family. Twin Lake is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The N150 is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs with no fans; it offers 4 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.6 GHz, but no Performance cores. Compared to the N250, the N150 has a significantly slower iGPU and slightly lower CPU clock speeds.

Gracemont E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance should be about as good as older dual-core CPUs like the Core i3-10110U. Exact figures depend on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Either way, this is a pretty slow chip that is only just fast enough for basic tasks.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 24 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.0 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for very old games and low resolutions such as XGA 1024 x 768.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The N150 is supposed to consume 6 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. No data on PL2 has been provided but values higher than 15 W are unlikely.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

ModelIntel Processor N97Intel Processor N150
CodenameAlder Lake-NTwin Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Twin Lake
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 compare1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N355 compare3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 compare - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 compare - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock <=3600 MHz <=3600 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP12 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.com
SocketBGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N97
25.8 pt (43%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Processor N150
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
N97 +
63 Points (35%)
min: 53     avg: 58.9     median: 60.7 (34%)     max: 61.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
N97 +
192 Points (4%)
min: 130     avg: 162.9     median: 167.2 (3%)     max: 187 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N97 +
2913 Points (3%)
min: 2016     avg: 2494     median: 2590.5 (2%)     max: 2777 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N97 +
973 Points (41%)
min: 828     avg: 912     median: 935 (39%)     max: 949 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N97 +
371 Points (40%)
min: 313     avg: 347     median: 356.5 (39%)     max: 362 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N97 +
1115 Points (3%)
min: 768     avg: 953     median: 992 (2%)     max: 1059 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
479 Points (3%)
min: 313     avg: 403.3     median: 422.5 (3%)     max: 455 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
161 Points (45%)
min: 134     avg: 149.2     median: 153.2 (42%)     max: 156.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
6 Points (8%)
min: 4.31     avg: 5     median: 5 (6%)     max: 5.68 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N97 +
1.9 Points (46%)
min: 1.67     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N97 +
5445 Points (33%)
min: 4743     avg: 5016     median: 5015.5 (30%)     max: 5288 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N97 +
15323 Points (11%)
min: 11375     avg: 13159     median: 13159 (10%)     max: 14943 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N97 +
24158 Points (15%)
min: 17063     avg: 19392     median: 19391.5 (12%)     max: 21720 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N97 +
8567 Points (10%)
min: 7251     avg: 7700     median: 7699.5 (9%)     max: 8148 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N97 +
523 s (6%)
min: 527.99     avg: 775     median: 774.8 (9%)     max: 1021.52 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N97 +
16.8 s (3%)
min: 16.776     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (5%)     max: 30.658 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N97 +
2321 Points (4%)
min: 1901     avg: 1930     median: 1929.5 (3%)     max: 1958 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N97 +
13174 MIPS (8%)
min: 9639     avg: 11373     median: 11746 (7%)     max: 12362 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N97 +
4019 MIPS (47%)
min: 3590     avg: 3792     median: 3835 (45%)     max: 3906 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N97 +
34.9 fps (12%)
min: 24.35     avg: 28.4     median: 28.4 (9%)     max: 32.4 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N97 +
174.8 fps (40%)
min: 119.8     avg: 139.9     median: 139.9 (32%)     max: 159.9 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N97 +
3.5 fps (6%)
min: 2.43     avg: 2.9     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.26 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N97 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
min: 0.217     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.256 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N97 +
0.5 GB/s (9%)
min: 0.407     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (8%)     max: 0.526 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N97 +
2.9 GB/s (8%)
min: 2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (6%)     max: 2.7 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
N97 +
2014 Seconds (26%)
min: 2085     avg: 2337     median: 2277 (29%)     max: 2707 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N97 +
1020 Seconds (7%)
min: 1063     avg: 1191     median: 1163.5 (8%)     max: 1374 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N97 +
0.8 sec (17%)
min: 0.846     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.957 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N97 +
6461 Points (14%)
5709 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N97 +
18.4 s (4%)
min: 19.09     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (4%)     max: 19.293 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N97 +
38.3 s (2%)
min: 39.184     avg: 40     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.809 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N97 +
786 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N97 +
15578 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N97 +
6118 Points (15%)
min: 4416     avg: 5194     median: 5274 (13%)     max: 5810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N97 +
50003 Points (41%)
min: 37351     avg: 42422     median: 42421.5 (34%)     max: 47492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N97 +
50545 Points (41%)
min: 36745     avg: 42156     median: 42156 (34%)     max: 47567 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N97 +
52858 Points (42%)
min: 43172     avg: 47134     median: 47134 (38%)     max: 51096 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N97 +
4565 Points (12%)
min: 3612     avg: 4035     median: 4026.5 (10%)     max: 4476 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N97 +
6473 Points (12%)
min: 5201     avg: 5826     median: 5889.5 (11%)     max: 6324 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
N97 +
2493 Points (11%)
min: 1704     avg: 1979     median: 1977.5 (8%)     max: 2256 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
N97 +
1300 Points (32%)
min: 1129     avg: 1218     median: 1243 (31%)     max: 1255 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
3181 Points (12%)
min: 2369     avg: 2849     median: 2967.5 (12%)     max: 3093 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
N97 +
1247 Points (40%)
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
3029 Points (12%)
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N97 +
1060 Points (41%)
min: 924     avg: 977     median: 981.5 (38%)     max: 1020 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
2757 Points (5%)
min: 2072     avg: 2463     median: 2556.5 (5%)     max: 2667 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N97 +
1052 Points (5%)
min: 907     avg: 941     median: 940.5 (4%)     max: 974 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
2738 Points (9%)
min: 2079     avg: 2309     median: 2308.5 (7%)     max: 2538 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N97 +
4703 Points (47%)
min: 4336     avg: 4432     median: 4431.5 (44%)     max: 4527 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N97 +
10893 Points (11%)
min: 8942     avg: 9608     median: 9608 (10%)     max: 10274 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N97 +
975 ms (1%)
min: 1044     avg: 1098     median: 1080.5 (1%)     max: 1186 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
N97 +
145.3 Points (40%)
min: 118.3     avg: 126.6     median: 126.3 (35%)     max: 135.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N97 +
191.4 Points (34%)
min: 145.3     avg: 164.6     median: 169.3 (30%)     max: 174.3 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N97 +
844 Points (32%)
min: 683     avg: 716     median: 712.5 (27%)     max: 756 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
37.1 Watt (6%)
min: 21.6     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 25.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
28.4 Watt (5%)
min: 20.1     avg: 22.5     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 24.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N97 +
13.5 Watt (9%)
min: 7.51     avg: 10.2     median: 8.9 (6%)     max: 14.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 20 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N97 → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N150 → 103% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 09. 02:45:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14969 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18713 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754700345s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 08 Aug 2025 14:21:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14969 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14969 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18713 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 18713 +0.007s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.072s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)