Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N200 vs Microsoft SQ1

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Microsoft SQ1

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SQ1

The Microsoft SQ1 is a ARM based SoC for Windows tablets (Surface Pro X). It is based on the Snapdragon 8cx but with higher clocked CPU and GPU cores. The CPU cores clock with up to 3 GHz. The 4 Kryo 495 Gold cores are based on the ARM Cortex-A76 architecture (for performance) and clocked at up to 3 GHz (2.84 GHz  for the 8cx) under load (no single core Turbo). The 4 Kryo 495 Silver cores are small ARM Cortex-A55 cores for power efficiency and clocked at 1.9 GHz (unverified) under load. The integrated X24 LTE modem supports up to 2 Gbps download speeds. Furthermore, the SoC integrates ac-Wifi and a dual-channel 32-bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller.

The processor performance should be similar to a Intel Core i5 8th gen U-series (e.g. i5-8250U) according to Qualcomm. However, this is only the case for native ARM64 compiled Windows apps which are not that many (in mid 2019). 32 bit applications and games for AMD/Intel run in a rather slow emulation and 65 bit apps wont start at all.

The integrated Adreno 685 graphics card is a higher clocked version of the Adreno 680 in the Snapdragon 8cx. Microsoft claims 2 TFlops theoretical performance compared to the 1.8 for the Adreno 680 (+11%).

The chip is very power efficient as its produced at TSMC in the modern 7 process. Therefore, laptops using the Snapdragon 8cx can be passively cooled (no fan) and should not throttle under constant load.

ModelIntel Processor N200Microsoft SQ1
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameAlder Lake-NCortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Intel Core i3-N305 compare1.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 compare - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 compare - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 compare - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 compare1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N50 compare1 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G compare3.15 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Microsoft SQ1 « 3 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx compare2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495)
Clock1000 - 3700 MHz3000 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
TDP6 Watt
Technology10 nm7 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 685
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.microsoft.com
FeaturesX24 LTE Modem, Adreno 685 GPU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
21.5 pt (30%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
45 Points (31%)
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
91 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 N200 +
1406 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 N200 +
690 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 N200 +
265 Points (29%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 N200 +
542 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
219 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
113 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
2.7 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N200 +
1.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N200 +
3937 Points (24%)
14%
SQ1 +
537 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N200 +
7549 Points (5%)
57%
SQ1 +
4276 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
11030 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N200 +
5971 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N200 +
875 s (10%)
106%
SQ1 +
429.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N200 +
26 s (5%)
103%
SQ1 +
14.2 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N200 +
2115 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
7146 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 N200 +
3230 MIPS (39%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N200 +
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N200 +
80 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 N200 +
1.5 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N200 +
0.3 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
4297 Seconds (55%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 N200 +
2150 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 N200 +
1.1 sec (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N200 +
3902 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
99%
SQ1 +
21.2 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N200 +
42.7 s (2%)
100%
SQ1 +
46.7 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N200 +
1011 s (4%)
100%
SQ1 +
1095 s (5%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N200 +
9491 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N200 +
2765 Points (7%)
116%
SQ1 +
3210 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N200 +
27649 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N200 +
28655 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N200 +
34749 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N200 +
2848 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N200 +
4135 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 N200 +
956 Points (29%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 N200 +
1660 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
928 Points (39%)
80%
SQ1 +
739 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1540 Points (3%)
187%
SQ1 +
2875 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
891 Points (4%)
82%
SQ1 +
728 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
1518 Points (5%)
183%
SQ1 +
2785 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
18%
SQ1 +
830 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N200 +
9989 Points (11%)
26%
SQ1 +
2597 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N200 +
1460 ms (2%)
100%
SQ1 +
1408 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 SQ1 +
31099 Points (28%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N200 +
171.3 Points (36%)
68%
SQ1 +
116 Points (24%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 N200 +
614 Points (24%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Microsoft SQ1 → 90% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 13. 10:24:54

#0 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11516 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.029s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.018s ... 0.047s

#7 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.013s ... 0.061s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11516 +0.003s ... 0.063s

#9 got single benchmarks 11516 +0.007s ... 0.07s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.261s ... 0.331s

#12 return log +0.032s ... 0.364s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)