Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek MT8168 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Mediatek MT8766B

MediaTek MT8168

► remove from comparison Mediatek MT8168

The MediaTek MT8168 is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 2 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-G52 MC1 (or MP1) graphics card, a LPDDR4x memory controller, Bluetooth and dual-band Wifi-5 802.11 b/g/n/ac are integrated in the SoC. The integrated camera ISP supports sensors with up to 13 MPix an Full HD videos at 60 fps.

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2020 and between a Snapdragon 429 and Snapdragon 632.

HiSilicon Kirin 659

► remove from comparison  Kirin 659

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.36 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz). The slightly older Kirin 658 is very similar. The 659 is in our benchmarks around 4% faster than the 658 and offers a better LTE radio (Cat. 13).

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at >=900 MHz), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

Mediatek MT8766B

► remove from comparison  Helio MT8766B

The Mediatek MT8766B is an entry-level ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets (mainly Android-based) that was introduced in 2020. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz. and a PowerVR GE6300 GPU. It looks very similar to the older Helio A20 (-200 MHz CPU core clock).

The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x. Furthermore, a LTE radio with Cat-4 DL (150 Mbps download) and Cat-5 UL (75 Mbps upload) and a 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi 5 modem is integrated.

The SoC should be produced in the same 12nm process as the Helio A20 (most likely the same chip).

ModelMediaTek MT8168HiSilicon Kirin 659Mediatek MT8766B
SeriesMediatek Mediatek MT8 Mediatek MT8
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek MT8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87681.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8168 « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 « 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT87681.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81682 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8766B « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz2360 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 84 / 4
Technology12 nm16 nm12 nm
FeaturesLPDDR4x memory controller, 1080p video encode, 1080p video decode, Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth, FM radio supportARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerPowerVR GE8300, Dual-Channel LPDDR3 / LPDDR4X, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth, LTE Cat-4 DL / Cat-5 UL, H.264 Encode, H.265 Decode
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1 ( - 800 MHz)ARM Mali-T830 MP2PowerVR GE8300
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - MT8168
0.2 pt (14%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio MT8766B
0.2 pt (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12599 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 14979     avg: 15059     median: 15046 (13%)     max: 15151 Points
13779 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1263     avg: 1268     median: 1265 (15%)     max: 1277 Points
853 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1268     avg: 1273     median: 1271 (15%)     max: 1280 Points
860 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8168 +
min: 141     avg: 143     median: 144 (6%)     max: 144 Points
133 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8168 +
min: 499     avg: 501     median: 500 (1%)     max: 504 Points
455 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 833     avg: 835     median: 835 (8%)     max: 837 Points
783 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2463     avg: 2470     median: 2469.5 (3%)     max: 2476 Points
2217 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 887     avg: 888     median: 888 (12%)     max: 889 Points
741 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3438     avg: 3473     median: 3473 (8%)     max: 3508 Points
2043 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3508 Points (5%)
2112 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
876 Points (13%)
722 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
684 Points (6%)
968 Points (8%)
725 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2299 Points (21%)
2829 Points (26%)
1727 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
3658 Points (7%)
5944 Points (12%)
3305 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2086 Points (4%)
3298 Points (7%)
1865 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2538 Points (7%)
3897 Points (10%)
2227 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11103     avg: 11179     median: 11178.5 (13%)     max: 11254 ms
min: 8684     avg: 9440     median: 9271 (11%)     max: 10788 ms
11505 ms (13%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1173 ms (13%)
1609 ms (18%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4115     avg: 4169     median: 4168.5 (4%)     max: 4222 Points
min: 4191     avg: 4947     median: 4980 (4%)     max: 5471 Points
3920 Points (4%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
30 Points (6%)
min: 34     avg: 38.7     median: 40 (8%)     max: 42 Points
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 62810     avg: 65730     median: 66608 (23%)     max: 68232 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 7947     avg: 8633     median: 8430.5 (26%)     max: 9656 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 21484     avg: 23751     median: 24193.5 (30%)     max: 24268 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 12982     avg: 13331     median: 13167.5 (4%)     max: 14340 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 39451     avg: 41305     median: 41643.5 (25%)     max: 41874 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 81992     avg: 87019     median: 87511.5 (15%)     max: 89639 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 MT8168 +
min: 27479     avg: 27507     median: 27507 (23%)     max: 27535 Points
15424 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 MT8168 +
min: 13757     avg: 13814     median: 13813.5 (11%)     max: 13870 Points
24878 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 MT8168 +
min: 16023     avg: 16049     median: 16049 (3%)     max: 16075 Points
4722 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 MT8168 +
min: 32998     avg: 33063     median: 33062.5 (12%)     max: 33127 Points
30304 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 MT8168 +
min: 90422     avg: 90432     median: 90432 (9%)     max: 90442 Points
75328 Points (7%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
1694 Iter./s (52%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
20418 Iter./s (67%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8168 +
70655 Points (9%)
min: 122441     avg: 127602     median: 127602 (17%)     max: 132762 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2361 Points (12%)
min: 2413     avg: 2626     median: 2635 (14%)     max: 2819 Points
2761 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
5685 Points (12%)
min: 5970     avg: 7032     median: 6957 (15%)     max: 8244 Points
6844 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4454     avg: 4572     median: 4509 (29%)     max: 4753 Points
4808 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5620     avg: 5866     median: 5667 (28%)     max: 6311 Points
6431 Points (32%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8168 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 659 → 127% n=17

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8766B → 94% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 04. 18:58:04

#0 checking url part for id 12645 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9252 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13125 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.063s ... 0.064s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.064s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12645 +0.011s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 12645 +0.011s ... 0.085s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9252 +0.002s ... 0.088s

#10 got single benchmarks 9252 +0.022s ... 0.11s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 13125 +0.009s ... 0.119s

#12 got single benchmarks 13125 +0.01s ... 0.129s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.129s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.225s ... 0.354s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.354s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)