Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 vs Intel Core i5-1030NG7

Apple M2

► remove from comparison Apple M2

The Apple M2 is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2022 MacBook Air and, MacBook Pro 13. It offers 8 cores divided in four performance cores and four power-efficiency cores. The big cores offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 16 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB). The four efficiency cores are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with  up to 2,4 GHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with up to 3,5 GHz and therefore higher than the M1 cores. The architecture should be similar to the A15 (iPhone 13) with Avalanche and Blizzard cores.

The chip features a unified memory architecture for the CPU and GPU cores and supports up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 for a bandwidth of up to 100GB/s.

According to Apple, the M2 offers a 18% higher CPU performance at the same power consumption level compared to the Apple M1. In our tests, the MacBook Pro 13 with active cooling was able to reach the 18% in Geekbench Multi. In other benchmarks we measured 12 to 15% gains compared to the M1. Therefore, the performance is now near the M1 Pro with 8 cores. The passively cooled MacBook Air may however suffer from throttling in longer load scenarios.

The integrated graphics card in the M2 offers 8 or 10 cores and a peak performance of 3.6 TFLOPs.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine with a peak performance of 16 TOPS (for AI hardware acceleration), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), Thunderbolt / USB 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders.

The Apple M2 includes 20 billion transistors (up from the 16 billion of the M1) and is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is rated at 20W what we also measured under CPU load.

Intel Core i5-1030NG7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1030NG7

The Intel Core i5-1030NG7 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Ice -Lake-Y generation that was announced in Mai 2019 (Computex). It integrates four Sunnycove processor cores (8 threads thanks to HyperThreading) clocked at 1.1 (base) - 3.8 (single core Turbo) GHz. All four cores can turbo up to 3.2 GHz using Turbo Boost. According to Intel the Sunnycove cores achieve 18% more IPCs (Instructions per Clock).

Compared to the normal Core i5-1030G7, the i5-1030NG7 offers a smaller package size (22 x 16.5 versus 26.5 x 18.5 mm), a higher base clock of 1100 versus 800 MHz and a 1 Watt higher TDP.

Combined with the two additional cores, the previous Y-series dual core processors (Amber Lake-Y) should be always slower. Short burst performance should be excellent, long workloads will depend on the TDP settings and cooling solution in the laptop / tablet.

The biggest improvement for Ice-Lake is the integrated Gen 11 graphics card called Iris Plus Graphics. The Core i5-1030NG7 integrates the biggest G7 variant with 64 CUs clocked at 300 - 1050 MHz. The Iris Plus G7 should be twice as fast as the predecessors and best the AMD Vega 10 GPU in current Ryzen APUs. However, in the Y-series the gaming performance will be again depending on the cooling solution and may degrade clearly over time (compared to the Core i7-1065G7 with 15 - 25 Watt e.g.).

Other improvements for Ice Lake are the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip. The integrated DDR4 memory controller supports modules with up to 3200 MHz (and LPDDDR4 3733).

The Core i5-1030NG7 is produced in the new 10nm process at Intel (2nd generation) that should offer a comparable performance to the 7nm process at TSMC. The TDP is specified at 10 Watts and therefore the CPU can be used in thin and light laptops. Intel offers a configurable TDP of up to 12 Watts for the partners resulting in significant performance differences (due to longer periods of Turbo Boost).

ModelApple M2Intel Core i5-1030NG7
SeriesApple M2Intel Ice Lake
Series: Ice Lake Ice Lake Y
Apple M2 Max compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro compare2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 « 2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1060NG7 compare1.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1060G7 compare1 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1030NG7 « 1.1 - 3.5 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 compare1.1 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3480 MHz1100 - 3500 MHz
L1 Cache2 MB192 KB
L2 Cache20 MB2 MB
L3 Cache8 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 8
TDP20 Watt10 Watt
Transistors20000 Million
Technology5 nm10 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetAVX512, DL Boost, Turbo Boost 2.0
iGPUApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (300 - 1050 MHz)
ArchitectureARMx86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.apple.com
CodenameIce Lake Y

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1030NG7
23.9 pt (40%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
121 Points (68%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
513 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 8517     avg: 8654     median: 8667 (8%)     max: 8772 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1580     avg: 1595     median: 1585 (67%)     max: 1638 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
M2 +
min: 216     avg: 370.8     median: 381 (42%)     max: 446 Points
min: 330     avg: 352.5     median: 352.5 (38%)     max: 375 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
M2 +
min: 2231     avg: 2325     median: 2324 (6%)     max: 2416 Points
min: 764     avg: 876     median: 875.5 (2%)     max: 987 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
M2 +
min: 1209.9     avg: 1222     median: 1215 (8%)     max: 1243 Points
448 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
M2 +
min: 222     avg: 223.8     median: 223 (62%)     max: 229 Points
140 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.4 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.2 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4250 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9432 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
687 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.2 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3878 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
10924 MIPS (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3472 MIPS (41%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
16.9 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
77.4 fps (18%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
3 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.3 GB/s (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
3.1 GB/s (8%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 540     avg: 620     median: 619.5 (8%)     max: 702 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
M2 +
min: 549     avg: 614     median: 597 (4%)     max: 713 Seconds
1310 Seconds (9%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.909     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.922 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3828 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
653 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
4023 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
23108 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4171 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1737 Points (7%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2587     avg: 2609     median: 2599 (65%)     max: 2650 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
1 M2 +
min: 10034     avg: 10083     median: 10089 (39%)     max: 10120 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 1887     avg: 1914     median: 1915.5 (75%)     max: 1953 Points
min: 1010     avg: 1089     median: 1088.5 (43%)     max: 1167 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
M2 +
min: 8491     avg: 8812     median: 8956 (16%)     max: 8994 Points
min: 2539     avg: 2710     median: 2710 (5%)     max: 2881 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1020 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2572 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4996 Points (50%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12112 Points (12%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 CPU Mark
6448 Points (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
M2 +
min: 440     avg: 450.1     median: 449.2 (1%)     max: 466.8 ms
min: 917     avg: 966     median: 965.5 (1%)     max: 1014 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
132 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
M2 +
min: 72484     avg: 75019     median: 74878 (55%)     max: 78736 Points
42305 Points (31%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 223     avg: 237.8     median: 235 (65%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
M2 +
min: 342     avg: 366.5     median: 376 (68%)     max: 387 Points
min: 136     avg: 158.5     median: 158.5 (28%)     max: 181 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1257990     avg: 1337360     median: 1337360 (65%)     max: 1416730 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 294643     avg: 298254     median: 298254 (74%)     max: 301865 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1936540     avg: 1954930     median: 1961470 (65%)     max: 1966790 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 M2 +
min: 535127     avg: 540446     median: 537292 (16%)     max: 548919 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1437     avg: 1515     median: 1507 (56%)     max: 1585 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
18.2 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
29 Watt (5%)
17.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 6.86     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (4%)     max: 9.71 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 2.03     avg: 2.6     median: 2.4 (2%)     max: 3.98 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 M2 +
min: 1.631     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (4%)     max: 5.32 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 M2 +
42.4 Points per Watt (32%)
25 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1030NG7 → 51% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 20:45:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14521 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11945 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755456337s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14521 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 14521 +0.008s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11945 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#10 got single benchmarks 11945 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.033s ... 0.059s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)