Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Apple M2 10-Core GPU

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

► remove from comparison Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645

The Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 (GT3e) is a processor graphics card that was first seen in the Apple MacBook Pro 13 (Entry, 2019) in mid 2019. It is similar to the Iris Plus Graphics 655 in the 28 Watt CPUs.

The so called GT3e version of the Coffee-Lake GPU still has 48 Execution Units (EUs), which can reach up to 1150 MHz depending on the model. Besides eDRAM cache, the Iris 645 can also access the system memory (2x 64 Bit DDR3L-2133/DDR4-2400) via processor interface.

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Plus Graphics 645 depends on the CPU model, because maximum clock as well as the size of the L3 cache can differ a bit. The system memory (DDR3/DDR4) will influence the performance as well.

The fastest chips are high-clocked Core i7 models like the Core i7-8557U. Depending on the game, the Iris Plus 655 will probably be on par with a dedicated GeForce 930M or GeForce 940MX and can handle smooth gameplay in modern titles in low up to medium settings.

Features

The reworked video engine now fully supports hardware decoding of H.265/HEVC videos. Contrary to Skylake, however, Kaby Lake can now also decode H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The video output is possible via DP 1.2/eDP 1.3 (up to 3840 x 2160 @60 Hz), whereas HDMI is also supported in the older 1.4a standard. An HDMI 2.0 output can be added via converter from DisplayPort. The GPU can drive up to three displays simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used for 15-Watt processor and therefore small-sized notebooks.

Apple M2 10-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M2 10-Core GPU

The Apple M2 GPU is an integrated graphics card offering 10 cores designed by Apple and integrated in the Apple M2 SoC. It uses the unified memory architecture of the M2 SoC (up to 24 GB LPDDR5-6400 with 100 GB/s bandwidth) and should offer 160 execution units.

According to Apple it offers a 25% higher performance at slightly higher power consumption. The theoretical performance is rated at 3.6 Teraflops and therefore 1 TFLOP higher than the M1 8-core GPU. In our benchmarks, the GPU was able to top the M1 with up to 40%, but still stays behind the 14-core GPU in the M1 Pro. Compared to other iGPUs from AMD and Intel, the M2 benefits greatly from the unified memory architecture and the high bandwidth.

The M2 chip is manufactured in the second generation 5nm process at TSMC (most likely N5P). The power consumption is around 13.5 Watt (in our tests under load of the MBP13) and up to 15W according to Apple.

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Apple M2 Series
Iris Plus Graphics 655 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 650 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.1 GHz64/128 Bit
Iris Plus Graphics 645 48 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
Iris Plus Graphics 640 compare 48 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics P630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.2 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 630 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics P630 compare 24 64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz
HD Graphics 620 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 617 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.15 GHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1 GHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 615 compare 24 @ 0.3 - 1.05 GHz64/128 Bit
M2 Max 38-Core GPU compare 38
M2 Max 30-Core GPU compare 30
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU compare 19 @ 0.44 - 1.4 GHz
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU compare 16
M2 10-Core GPU 10 @ 1.4 GHz
M2 8-Core GPU compare 8 @ 1.4 GHz
CodenameKaby Lake GT3e
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Pipelines48 - unified10 - unified
Core Speed300 - 1150 (Boost) MHz1398 (Boost) MHz
Memory TypeDDR3, DDR4LPDDR5-6400
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.5
technology14 nm5 nm
FeaturesQuickSync
Date of Announcement10.07.2019 06.06.2022
Power Consumption15 Watt
PredecessorM1 8-Core GPU
CPU in Iris Plus Graphics 645GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Core i7-8557U4 x 1700 MHz, 28 W300 MHz1150 MHz
Intel Core i5-8257U4 x 1400 MHz, 15 W300 MHz1050 MHz
min. - max.300 MHz1050 - 1150 MHz
CPU in M2 10-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M28 x 2424 MHz, 20 W? MHz1398 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 2532     avg: 2574     median: 2573.5 (6%)     max: 2615 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 21302     avg: 23924     median: 24236 (12%)     max: 25317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5328     avg: 6533     median: 6823.5 (8%)     max: 6987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6654     avg: 7369     median: 7369 (3%)     max: 8084 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
1736 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
1893 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
624 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
550 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
3238 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2985 Points (2%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
min: 205     avg: 221     median: 221 (23%)     max: 237 Seconds
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 55.3     avg: 67.1     median: 67.1 (4%)     max: 78.9 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
min: 128.65     avg: 132.8     median: 131 (8%)     max: 140.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.8     avg: 98.6     median: 98.6 (99%)     max: 99.3 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.6     avg: 43.9     median: 47.9 (18%)     max: 48.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
20.2 fps (4%)
min: 68     avg: 96     median: 102.6 (18%)     max: 110 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
53.4 fps (4%)
min: 208     avg: 267.5     median: 283.8 (21%)     max: 296 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 136     avg: 197.6     median: 206.1 (19%)     max: 232 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
69.6 fps (1%)
min: 247     avg: 318.6     median: 331.5 (7%)     max: 374.6 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
101.8 fps (4%)
min: 411     avg: 503     median: 509.5 (21%)     max: 557.2 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
198.3 fps (2%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
min: 628     avg: 824     median: 891.5 (7%)     max: 931.9 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 654168     avg: 728087     median: 728086 (73%)     max: 802005 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 781041     avg: 790061     median: 785809 (63%)     max: 803332 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 27880     avg: 27900     median: 27900 (7%)     max: 27920 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Metal
min: 42013     avg: 44473     median: 45460 (25%)     max: 45946 Points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.8     avg: 27.8     median: 26.9 (4%)     max: 34.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 27.8     avg: 32.5     median: 30.8 (7%)     max: 38.9 Watt
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 16     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (6%)     max: 16.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra
min: 1.007     avg: 1     median: 1 (91%)     max: 1.108 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Witcher 3 ultra external Monitor
min: 1.116     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (92%)     max: 1.207 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
34.6 dB(A) (49%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 10-Core GPU → 395% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
ultra Ultra
M2 10-Core GPU:
59.3  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.8  fps
ultra
M2 10-Core GPU:
58.5  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
ultra
M2 10-Core GPU:
65  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
118.4  fps
low 1280x720
M2 10-Core GPU:
53.1 66.8 73 ~ 64 fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
34 34.2 36 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 23.8 28 ~ 25 fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
15 16.4 17.6 ~ 16 fps
low 1280x720
M2 10-Core GPU:
88.6 89 136 138 ~ 113 fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
39 45.3 46.3 47 ~ 44 fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
22 26.3 29 29.5 ~ 27 fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
15.9 16 21 21.3 ~ 19 fps
low 1280x720
M2 10-Core GPU:
60 76 102 ~ 79 fps
med. 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
28 31 39 40 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
25 27 36 36 ~ 31 fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
21 23 31 32 ~ 27 fps
QHD 2560x1440
M2 10-Core GPU:
20  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
39.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
37.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
76.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
57.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
29  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
26.9  fps
high 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M2 10-Core GPU:
28  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
67.7  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
M2 10-Core GPU:
44.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
104.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
60  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
51.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Iris Plus Graphics 645:
22.1  fps

Average Gaming Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645Apple M2 10-Core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal59.3
Call of Duty Mobile118.858.5
Genshin Impact65
Armajet118.4
Borderlands 364352516
Total War: Three Kingdoms113442719
Shadow of the Tomb Raider7935312720
PUBG Mobile39.8
The Witcher 33428
Asphalt 8: Airborne67.7
Asphalt 9: Legends44.2
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645Apple M2 10-Core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4

3

2
4
2
4
2
1
1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 11. 02:06:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9902 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11368 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760141179s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 10 Oct 2025 05:19:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.023s ... 0.024s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.024s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.024s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9902 +0.007s ... 0.031s

#9 got single benchmarks 9902 +0s ... 0.031s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11368 +0s ... 0.031s

#11 got single benchmarks 11368 +0.008s ... 0.039s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.054s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.054s

#15 Got 65 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.062s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.062s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.063s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.068s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.068s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)