Huawei P Smart 2019
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 55 scores (from 81 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P Smart 2019
The new smartphone from Huawei, the P Smart 2019, can be described with these three words. The performance has been increased significantly and the smartphone runs the latest version of Android (9.0 Pie). However, in the course of our review, we observed several drawbacks that we also saw in our review of the predecessor.
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionComing in at less than £200, the Huawei P Smart 2019 is a surprisingly robust smartphone experience wrapped up in an eye-catching "ceramic-like" finish. While the cost may be low, the P Smart 2019 packs in a surprising amount of features that let this handset punch above its weight. Most impressive is its dual 13/2-megapixel primary camera, which packs in a surprising amount of features and can even take usable low-light photos. With the latest version of Android, which comes with an impressive set of additional features, a large battery and decent processor, this is an impressive phone at a very reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgetspeak
Archive.org versionOpening the latest smartphone offering from Vodafone was a little confusing. I was expecting the product to be a Huawei P smart 2019 handset which Huawei was targeted at users who were looking for a reasonably price handset, with a price tag of sub-£200, but the box containing the handset was embellished with the letters “VX” along with the Huawei logo and the year 2019. However further checking of the box revealed a label stating that this was the Midnight Black version of the Huawei P smart 2019. Other colour scenes available include Aurora Blue and Turquoise Blue.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak
Archive.org versionIt is not often that I review the same phone twice; however a lot has changed in this offering since my initial review last May. So it’s probably best to call this a new phone that just happens to have the same name as an earlier version.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Htxt Africa
Archive.org versionSelling for a recommended R4 999, the Huawei P Smart is very reasonable when compared to other Android smartphones. What makes it particularly good value for money is that it features specifications and components that one may see in more expensive mid-range phones. As such you're getting far more bang for your buck.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone
Archive.org versionThe Huawei P Smart 2019 is a great option for the budget conscious and also for a first phone for a teenager. It ticks all the major boxes whilst not excelling at any one particular thing. I am impressed as to what Huawei has managed to cram into the phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 85% mobility: 83% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena
Archive.org versionThe P Smart 2019 has a display that stands out with chart-topping accuracy but is distinctly good enough in other respects. Battery life is solid and charging speed isn't as slow as the pedestrian adapter would have suggested. Image quality is not flagship grade, but it'll do. It runs the latest OS in a world of generally outdated software. And all of this comes at a very reasonable price, which is often sweetened further by carrier subsidies. What's not to like?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Stuff TV
Archive.org versionThe Huawei P Smart is classier-looking than last year’s phone of the same name. There’s an awful lot of good choices at around this price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone
Archive.org versionTo kick things off for 2019, I have got a new phone from Huawei which went on sale with Vodafone (other networks are available) this morning.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionA surprisingly robust smartphone experience for the price wrapped up in an inoffensive design that should appeal to anyone looking for a capable budget handset.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionGiven the similarities to the Honor 10 Lite and the 8Mp rather than 24Mp selfie camera, you might wonder why it’s worth buying the P Smart 2019 instead. And that, ultimately, is the biggest problem for Huawei’s latest budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Area DVD
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2019
Source: A1 Blog
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2019
Source: Android Pit
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hartware
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Connect - 3/19

Comparison, , Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 76% mobility: 87% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Teltarif
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android User
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2019
Source: Tech Stage
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 92% mobility: 99%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 83% features: 75% display: 84% mobility: 89%
Source: Hardware-Mag.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 87% performance: 79% mobility: 89% workmanship: 58%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Curved
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 82% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Inside Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Pit
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: Arturogoga
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Movil Zona
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 78% display: 83% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: FAQsAndroid
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Stylish design; solid workmanship; long battery life; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2019
Source: PC Guia
PT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80%
Source: Android Geek
PT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice main camera; decent display; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Only 3GB RAM; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 68% mobility: 80% workmanship: 69%
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 82% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 79% features: 81%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 78% display: 79% mobility: 88% workmanship: 83%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Panorama
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Impressive triple cameras; big screen; nice display; decent hardware; good autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Nice display; big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; stylish design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: Tablets Magazine
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Portablegear
NL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Big screen; attractive design; nice dual cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/28/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Modern design; nice cameras; decent hardware. Negative: Short battery life; weak face ID.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Source: Fredzone
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Hitek
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Le monde numerique
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Clubic
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: 01Net
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2019
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Excellent display; good price; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: Log.com.tr
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Hitech Vesti
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; powerful processor; great display; excellent cameras; long battery life; nice connectivity. Negative: Plastic case; slippery; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/04/2019
Source: DGL.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; big screen; bright display; nice cameras; decent hardware; support NFC. Negative: Plastic case; only microUSB port.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; big screen; great display; good autonomy; fast charging; support NFC; attractive price. Negative: Only microUSB port; plastic case; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; powerful processor; nice display; good connectivity; attractive price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Source: CZC
CZ→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Premium design; compact size; high performance; great display; nice main camera. Negative: Poor selfie camera; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Source: FPT shop
VN→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Big screen; powerful processor; nice dual cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Mobility.bg
BU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; decent hardware; nice design; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: Tek.no
NO→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Mobil DK
DA→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 61% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: M3 PC för alla
SV→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro
→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Powerful processor; modern design; nice cameras; good price. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2019
Comment
ARM Mali-G51 MP4: Integrated mid range graphics card with 4 clusters. Beware the results in the Mate 20 Lite, that detects benchmarks and boosts the performance.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 710: ARM based octa-core SoC containing four Cortex-A73 cores for performance tasks (up to 2.2 GHz) and four Cortex-A53 cores (up to 1.7 GHz) to save power. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an LTE radio (600 MBps down) and a ARM Mali-G51MP4 GPU. The SoC is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.