Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, pop-up
Pricecompare
Average of 25 scores (from 33 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P Smart Z 2019
The pop-up camera has arrived in the mid-range. The P Smart Z from Huawei combines premium features such as the pop-up camera with a price in the mid-range segment. However, the implementation of the Huawei smartphones is not always successful and still leaves room for improvements.
Source: A1 Blog DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2019
Source: Connect - 8/19
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 64% mobility: 95% ergonomy: 57%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% features: 83% display: 88% mobility: 98%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% features: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 78% display: 83% mobility: 9.% workmanship: 85%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice performance; elegant display; long battery life; attractive price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2019
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 72% display: 69% mobility: 85% workmanship: 72%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 68% features: 92%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent display; powerful hardware; impressive cameras; stylish design; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; excellent display; good price; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/26/2019
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice display; frameless design; great cameras; excellent autonomy; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display; decent processor; long battery life; NFC.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2019
Source: Yamobi RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Solid workmanship; big screen; nice display; good selfie camera; long battery life; fast chaging. Negative: Heavy and bulky; marked case; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2019
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; beautiful display; great main cameras; high performance; fast system; long battery life. Negative: Relatively heavy and bulky; inflexible fingerprint sensor; photo quality in low light.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/29/2019
Source: Alt om Data DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 100% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 72%
Comment
ARM Mali-G51 MP4: Integrated mid range graphics card with 4 clusters. Beware the results in the Mate 20 Lite, that detects benchmarks and boosts the performance.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 710: ARM based octa-core SoC containing four Cortex-A73 cores for performance tasks (up to 2.2 GHz) and four Cortex-A53 cores (up to 1.7 GHz) to save power. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an LTE radio (600 MBps down) and a ARM Mali-G51MP4 GPU. The SoC is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.59":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. is a Chinese telecommunications company and hardware manufacturer founded in 1987 and headquartered in Shenzhen. Huawei is a global leader in information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. Huawei provides end-to-end solutions for telecommunications networks, devices, and smartphones, as well as storage, servers, networking, and cloud computing enterprise solutions and products.
In 2014, Huawei established the Honor subsidiary brand under which certain smartphone lines are sold. The Huawei name is usually not listed for these products.
73.54%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.