Huawei P Series
Processor: Kirin 659, HiSilicon Kirin 710Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4, ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Display: 5.65 inch, 6.20 inch, 6.21 inch, 6.30 inch, 6.59 inch
Weight: 0.143kg, 0.16kg, 0.163kg, 0.169kg, 0.197kg, 0.206kg
Price: 199, 250, 259, 279, 299, 300 euro
Average of 314 scores (from 441 reviews)
Huawei P smart
With the colors of black, blue, gold and rose gold, the Huawei P Smart is posed with a 5.65 inch 2.5D curved glass screen that not only boasts vivid colors, but is also very comfortable when it is touched. Gaining entry into the market in December 2017, this device weighs 165 g and bears 7.5 mm in thickness. It is blanketed with a slim front glass, aluminum body. The Huawei P Smart features a FullView Display of an IPS type LCD capacitive touchscreen. It has the newer Full HD+ resolution to support its 18:9 aspect ratio screen.Technological advancement has pushed the Huawei P Smart towards a readjustment in its size and position of its metallic battery cover slot, extension of the front-cover metal and antenna matching, which have garnered the assurance of no reduction in performance. This is surprising as around half of its space was cleared for reduction purpose. The Huawei P Smart is embedded with a Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM , dual stand-by). It runs on a Kirin 659 CPU which is utilized for the processing in mid-range and high end chips to generate better performance in energy, and operates under an EMUI 8.0 operating system. The EMUI 8.0 was noted to be one of the most user-friendly operating system for Huawei devices. It is accompanied with the benefit of a Smart Split Screen that allows two apps to run side by side thus, making things done simultaneously with just a touch of a button. High quality images are shot through the lenses of a high spec 13 MP + 2 MP dual camera. The 8 MP front camera enables the Face Beauty editing functions to beautify the image snapped of any facial characteristics. The P Smart also has other tricks such as gesture-shot function that permits selfies and groupies to be taken with just the wave of a hand. Furthermore, another added advantage is that file transfers can be done through a speed of light with the Huawei P Smart’s Share Function. The connectivity of the Huawei P Smart supports two Bluetooth audio devices concurrently. Its highly responsive user interactivity is further enhanced with the EMUI 8.0 being installed into the device. This device comes with 32 GB internal storage. The storage capacity can be expanded by up to 256 GB with a microSD card. Its connectivity expands to WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS, NFC, FM radio and a microUSM 2.0. The Huawei P Smart has a non-removable Lithium-Polymer battery with a capacity of 3000 mAh. It is a solid device for those who are looking for a budget phone with high specs and the latest trend “Full-Screen” device. It is essentially a more affordable version of its Nova 2i. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: Huawei P smartProcessor: Kirin 659
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Display: 5.65 inch, 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.143kg
Price: 259 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
How exactly is the Huawei P Smart smart? Why did we not think of that? Choosing 'smart' as a name for a smartphone is just as in-your-face as naming a soccer team 'the team'. And it inadvertently raises the question: what exactly does 'smart' really mean?
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is a smart choice if you're after an affordable handset with a big 18:9 display, but you can get better performance and photos elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is a smart choice if you're after an affordable handset with a big 18:9 display, but you can get better performance and photos elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: What Mobile Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is a fantastic budget smartphone. There is very little missing in the relatively small package when compared to a flagship and quite frankly the price is way too low.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: What Mobile Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is a fantastic budget smartphone. There is very little missing in the relatively small package when compared to a flagship and quite frankly the price is way too low.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 100% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
This new phone from the company that are making Samsung and Apple look over their shoulders does not have the eye watering price of some of the recent offerings in fact this is available on PAYG 1 from Vodafone for only £229.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
This new phone from the company that are making Samsung and Apple look over their shoulders does not have the eye watering price of some of the recent offerings in fact this is available on PAYG 1 from Vodafone for only £229.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% performance: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
Sure, it may fall into the “mid-range” or even “budget” pricing structure, but we really shouldn’t equate that with a lesser handset any more, because this isn’t a lesser handset. It certainly shows that, for not that-much-money, you can buy a phone which is only a small really small down from the leading-edge phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 95% price: 100% features: 84% workmanship: 94%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
Sure, it may fall into the “mid-range” or even “budget” pricing structure, but we really shouldn’t equate that with a lesser handset any more, because this isn’t a lesser handset. It certainly shows that, for not that-much-money, you can buy a phone which is only a small really small down from the leading-edge phones.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 95% price: 100% features: 84% workmanship: 94%
Source: Zdnet.com Archive.org version
Reviewing the Honor 9 Lite, I said it set the new high bar for the £200 price point. That makes it a tough handset to beat, and the Huawei P Smart doesn't quite manage it: Huawei's budget brand definitely takes the plaudits in this particular head-to-head.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Zdnet.com Archive.org version
Reviewing the Honor 9 Lite, I said it set the new high bar for the £200 price point. That makes it a tough handset to beat, and the Huawei P Smart doesn't quite manage it: Huawei's budget brand definitely takes the plaudits in this particular head-to-head.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
With a decent 18:9 screen, the P Smart is a fine Android phone that should appeal to anyone looking for a cheap contract phone. However, the fact it’s so similar to the Honor 9 Lite (which costs £30 less when bought SIM-free) makes it hard to recommend, especially as the Honor has a couple of extra features – dual SIM and a second front camera – which the Huawei lacks.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
With a decent 18:9 screen, the P Smart is a fine Android phone that should appeal to anyone looking for a cheap contract phone. However, the fact it’s so similar to the Honor 9 Lite (which costs £30 less when bought SIM-free) makes it hard to recommend, especially as the Honor has a couple of extra features – dual SIM and a second front camera – which the Huawei lacks.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
Just a month ago, we thought Huawei has hit the sweet spot with the Honor 7X, with pretty much unmatched value for money on a global scale, not confined to Southeast Asia. But the leading Chinese maker has outdone itself with the P Smart. Thoughtful trimming in the right places made it possible to keep the package up to par and drive the price down a little more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
Compared to flagship phones, the Huawei P Smart leaves some things to be desired. Improvements are needed in the battery life and performance department to make it an easy recommendation. However, stood against other £200-£250 phones and it holds its own pretty well thanks to a nice display, subtle design and modern appearance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
Just a month ago, we thought Huawei has hit the sweet spot with the Honor 7X, with pretty much unmatched value for money on a global scale, not confined to Southeast Asia. But the leading Chinese maker has outdone itself with the P Smart. Thoughtful trimming in the right places made it possible to keep the package up to par and drive the price down a little more.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
Compared to flagship phones, the Huawei P Smart leaves some things to be desired. Improvements are needed in the battery life and performance department to make it an easy recommendation. However, stood against other £200-£250 phones and it holds its own pretty well thanks to a nice display, subtle design and modern appearance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
If you’re in the market for a reliable smartphone that won’t break the bank, the Huawei P Smart is the perfect handset for you. It’s durable, fast and reliable. I mean, what more could you want from a £230 smartphone? But if you’re looking for something a little bit cheaper, the one-year-old Huawei P8 Lite is a fantastic alternative, priced at a measly £129.95 on Amazon. You can’t go wrong with either. There’s also the Moto G5. A fantastic budget smartphone that’s bound to impress.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
If you’re in the market for a reliable smartphone that won’t break the bank, the Huawei P Smart is the perfect handset for you. It’s durable, fast and reliable. I mean, what more could you want from a £230 smartphone? But if you’re looking for something a little bit cheaper, the one-year-old Huawei P8 Lite is a fantastic alternative, priced at a measly £129.95 on Amazon. You can’t go wrong with either. There’s also the Moto G5. A fantastic budget smartphone that’s bound to impress.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is a smart choice if you're after an affordable handset with a big 18:9 display, but you can get better performance and photos elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is a smart choice if you're after an affordable handset with a big 18:9 display, but you can get better performance and photos elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Tech.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 86% features: 82% display: 90% mobility: 73%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 86% features: 82% display: 90% mobility: 73%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 90% mobility: 60% workmanship: 100%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2018
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/27/2018
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 92% features: 92% display: 97% mobility: 99%
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 92% features: 92% display: 97% mobility: 99%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 74% display: 82% mobility: 74%
Source: n-tv DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 74% display: 82% mobility: 74%
Source: n-tv DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/17/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/17/2018
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 70% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 71% price: 70% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hipertextual ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Hipertextual ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; metal case; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2018
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; metal case; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; compact size; impressive color.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/17/2018
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; compact size; impressive color.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/17/2018
Source: Putoinformatico ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; large screen; excellent display; good dual cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; low price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/20/2018
Source: Putoinformatico ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; large screen; excellent display; good dual cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; low price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/20/2018
Source: Pplware PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Pplware PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; large screen. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2018
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; large screen. Negative: Average gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Esperienza Mobile IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ridble IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Ridble IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 75% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 72% mobility: 79% workmanship: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% display: 72% mobility: 79% workmanship: 78%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 82% features: 75% display: 79% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 86%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 82% features: 75% display: 79% mobility: 86% ergonomy: 86%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; long battery life; good performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; long battery life; good performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/14/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; good price. Negative: Low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive design; solid workmanship; good price. Negative: Low autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good price; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/16/2018
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; good price; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/16/2018
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; good price. Negative: Only microUSB.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; good price. Negative: Only microUSB.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Tecno Cino IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; fast system; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2018
Source: Tecno Cino IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; fast system; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2018
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display; powerful hardware; good cameras. Negative: Mediocre design; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2018
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display; powerful hardware; good cameras. Negative: Mediocre design; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; good hardware; support dual SIM; decent cameras; fast fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; good hardware; support dual SIM; decent cameras; fast fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Slim size; beautiful design; nice display; good dual cameras. Negative: Combined slot; poor connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/08/2018
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Slim size; beautiful design; nice display; good dual cameras. Negative: Combined slot; poor connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/08/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Input DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Input DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 72%
Huawei P Smart Plus
The Huawei P Smart Plus (2018) is a new mid-range smartphone from Huawei. In some markets, it’s known as Nova 3i. Equipped with Kirin 710 processor, facial recognition or camera AI, Huawei has reissued its flagship phone in the mid-range to compete against other brands, especially against Xiaomi, who stomps in this segment. With this P Smart Plus, Huawei repeats the successful design, and it is a success. Although it is also available in black and white, without a doubt the star of the party is the model with the gradient. Turning it around, the other key detail is striking, which is its notch or eyebrow. This notch is in virtually all phones that have facial recognition, as is the case. It is a beautiful mobile, which fits perfectly in one hand and weighs relatively little at 169 grams. The design is one of its strengths without a doubt. The 6.3-inch FHD+ IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen is such a beauty to behold, it has a resolution of 2340 x 1080 pixels and 409 pixels per inch density. It has 85 % NTSC, 19:9 aspect ratio and stretches up to 82.48 % screen-to-body ratio. The viewing angles are good, as is the brightness. It looks perfectly outdoors and in full sunlight. The phone has a dual camera. The main module has a resolution of 16 megapixels and f/2.2 aperture, and the second one is 2 megapixels. The second module is needed to create a bokeh effect. The camera also relies heavily on AI. The front camera main module is at 24 megapixels (f/2.0) and the second at 2 megapixels. The video quality is 1080p. The selfie camera is decent, with nice tonal improvements and filters. With the selfies camera, users can also activate the AR Lens, which allows users to add effects in real time to the photos and even create 3D emojis. Powering up the device is the new HiSilicon Kirin 710 chip from Huawei which was built on a 12 nm process technology. It has an octa-core processor clocking at 2.2 GHz. The ARM Mali-G51 MP4 graphics processor comes with four cores and clocks 767 MHz. Multitasking shouldn't be a problem since there's 4GB of RAM space available to handle all apps. Users also get 64 GB storage space ready to accommodate all files and apps. The P Smart Plus runs on Android 8.1 Oreo with Emotion 8.2 UI. The headphone jack is present, and that's good news. It is located in the lower area next to the microUSB connector and speaker. As a conclusion, the Huawei P Smart Plus is a smartphone with excellent performance, worthy of the best mid-range. It also combines pretty good design and autonomy of more than a day. Hands-on article by Jagadisa RajarathnamSpecifications
Notebook: Huawei P Smart PlusProcessor: HiSilicon Kirin 710
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Display: 6.30 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.169kg
Price: 299 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Even though the Huawei P Smart (2019) is already in stores, the Chinese manufacturer has just released the Plus version of its predecessor at what could prove to be a bargain price. The Plus model has improved internals and a larger screen, while it bears a greater resemblance to its successor than its stablemate. Read on to find out how the P Smart Plus performs in our tests and how it compares against its siblings.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/04/2018
Rating: features: 82%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/04/2018
Rating: features: 82%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 83% display: 83% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 78%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 83% display: 83% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 78%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 89% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% display: 80% mobility: 89% workmanship: 80%
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; nice performance; smart AI mode. Negative: Poor connectivity; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2018
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; nice performance; smart AI mode. Negative: Poor connectivity; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/10/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; solid workmanship; good performance; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; solid workmanship; good performance; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2018
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; stylish design; great built quality; powerful processor; high performance; impressive cameras. Negative: Poor connectivity; no NFC; no USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2018
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large screen; stylish design; great built quality; powerful processor; high performance; impressive cameras. Negative: Poor connectivity; no NFC; no USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/11/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: All About Phones NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: XGN NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Huawei P Smart 2019
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P Smart 2019Processor: HiSilicon Kirin 710
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Display: 6.20 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.16kg
Price: 250 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The new smartphone from Huawei, the P Smart 2019, can be described with these three words. The performance has been increased significantly and the smartphone runs the latest version of Android (9.0 Pie). However, in the course of our review, we observed several drawbacks that we also saw in our review of the predecessor.
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
Coming in at less than £200, the Huawei P Smart 2019 is a surprisingly robust smartphone experience wrapped up in an eye-catching "ceramic-like" finish. While the cost may be low, the P Smart 2019 packs in a surprising amount of features that let this handset punch above its weight. Most impressive is its dual 13/2-megapixel primary camera, which packs in a surprising amount of features and can even take usable low-light photos. With the latest version of Android, which comes with an impressive set of additional features, a large battery and decent processor, this is an impressive phone at a very reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
Coming in at less than £200, the Huawei P Smart 2019 is a surprisingly robust smartphone experience wrapped up in an eye-catching "ceramic-like" finish. While the cost may be low, the P Smart 2019 packs in a surprising amount of features that let this handset punch above its weight. Most impressive is its dual 13/2-megapixel primary camera, which packs in a surprising amount of features and can even take usable low-light photos. With the latest version of Android, which comes with an impressive set of additional features, a large battery and decent processor, this is an impressive phone at a very reasonable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
Opening the latest smartphone offering from Vodafone was a little confusing. I was expecting the product to be a Huawei P smart 2019 handset which Huawei was targeted at users who were looking for a reasonably price handset, with a price tag of sub-£200, but the box containing the handset was embellished with the letters “VX” along with the Huawei logo and the year 2019. However further checking of the box revealed a label stating that this was the Midnight Black version of the Huawei P smart 2019. Other colour scenes available include Aurora Blue and Turquoise Blue.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
Opening the latest smartphone offering from Vodafone was a little confusing. I was expecting the product to be a Huawei P smart 2019 handset which Huawei was targeted at users who were looking for a reasonably price handset, with a price tag of sub-£200, but the box containing the handset was embellished with the letters “VX” along with the Huawei logo and the year 2019. However further checking of the box revealed a label stating that this was the Midnight Black version of the Huawei P smart 2019. Other colour scenes available include Aurora Blue and Turquoise Blue.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
It is not often that I review the same phone twice; however a lot has changed in this offering since my initial review last May. So it’s probably best to call this a new phone that just happens to have the same name as an earlier version.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
It is not often that I review the same phone twice; however a lot has changed in this offering since my initial review last May. So it’s probably best to call this a new phone that just happens to have the same name as an earlier version.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Htxt Africa Archive.org version
Selling for a recommended R4 999, the Huawei P Smart is very reasonable when compared to other Android smartphones. What makes it particularly good value for money is that it features specifications and components that one may see in more expensive mid-range phones. As such you're getting far more bang for your buck.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Htxt Africa Archive.org version
Selling for a recommended R4 999, the Huawei P Smart is very reasonable when compared to other Android smartphones. What makes it particularly good value for money is that it features specifications and components that one may see in more expensive mid-range phones. As such you're getting far more bang for your buck.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart 2019 is a great option for the budget conscious and also for a first phone for a teenager. It ticks all the major boxes whilst not excelling at any one particular thing. I am impressed as to what Huawei has managed to cram into the phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 85% mobility: 83% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart 2019 is a great option for the budget conscious and also for a first phone for a teenager. It ticks all the major boxes whilst not excelling at any one particular thing. I am impressed as to what Huawei has managed to cram into the phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% features: 85% mobility: 83% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart (2019) lacks the oomph we’d want for heavy multitasking and 3D gaming, but it has loads of storage for the price, a decent camera, best-in-class design and a killer screen. While it’s a shame there’s no case in the box given the fact its plastic body scratches very easily, it’s excellent value for money.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
The P Smart 2019 has a display that stands out with chart-topping accuracy but is distinctly good enough in other respects. Battery life is solid and charging speed isn't as slow as the pedestrian adapter would have suggested. Image quality is not flagship grade, but it'll do. It runs the latest OS in a world of generally outdated software. And all of this comes at a very reasonable price, which is often sweetened further by carrier subsidies. What's not to like?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
The P Smart 2019 has a display that stands out with chart-topping accuracy but is distinctly good enough in other respects. Battery life is solid and charging speed isn't as slow as the pedestrian adapter would have suggested. Image quality is not flagship grade, but it'll do. It runs the latest OS in a world of generally outdated software. And all of this comes at a very reasonable price, which is often sweetened further by carrier subsidies. What's not to like?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 66%
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is classier-looking than last year’s phone of the same name. There’s an awful lot of good choices at around this price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
The Huawei P Smart is classier-looking than last year’s phone of the same name. There’s an awful lot of good choices at around this price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
To kick things off for 2019, I have got a new phone from Huawei which went on sale with Vodafone (other networks are available) this morning.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
A surprisingly robust smartphone experience for the price wrapped up in an inoffensive design that should appeal to anyone looking for a capable budget handset.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Cool Smartphone Archive.org version
To kick things off for 2019, I have got a new phone from Huawei which went on sale with Vodafone (other networks are available) this morning.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
A surprisingly robust smartphone experience for the price wrapped up in an inoffensive design that should appeal to anyone looking for a capable budget handset.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
Given the similarities to the Honor 10 Lite and the 8Mp rather than 24Mp selfie camera, you might wonder why it’s worth buying the P Smart 2019 instead. And that, ultimately, is the biggest problem for Huawei’s latest budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
Given the similarities to the Honor 10 Lite and the 8Mp rather than 24Mp selfie camera, you might wonder why it’s worth buying the P Smart 2019 instead. And that, ultimately, is the biggest problem for Huawei’s latest budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2019
Source: Area DVD DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/30/2019
Source: A1 Blog DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2019
Source: A1 Blog DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hartware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Hartware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Connect - 3/19
Comparison, , Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 76% mobility: 87% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Connect - 3/19
Comparison, , Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% features: 76% mobility: 87% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android User DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2019
Source: Android User DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/24/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 92% mobility: 99%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 98% features: 96% display: 92% mobility: 99%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 83% features: 75% display: 84% mobility: 89%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 83% features: 75% display: 84% mobility: 89%
Source: Hardware-Mag.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 87% performance: 79% mobility: 89% workmanship: 58%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Hardware-Mag.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 87% performance: 79% mobility: 89% workmanship: 58%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 82% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 80% display: 82% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: Arturogoga ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Arturogoga ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 78% display: 83% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 78% display: 83% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; solid workmanship; long battery life; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2019
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; solid workmanship; long battery life; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/09/2019
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% price: 80%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice main camera; decent display; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Only 3GB RAM; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice main camera; decent display; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Only 3GB RAM; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/09/2019
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 68% mobility: 80% workmanship: 69%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 70% display: 68% mobility: 80% workmanship: 69%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 82% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 79% features: 81%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 82% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 79% features: 81%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 78% display: 79% mobility: 88% workmanship: 83%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 78% display: 79% mobility: 88% workmanship: 83%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 75% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive triple cameras; big screen; nice display; decent hardware; good autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: Panorama IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive triple cameras; big screen; nice display; decent hardware; good autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/15/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; stylish design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; big screen; decent hardware; nice cameras; stylish design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/01/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/03/2019
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablets Magazine NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Portablegear NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; attractive design; nice dual cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/28/2019
Source: Portablegear NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; attractive design; nice dual cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/28/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; decent hardware. Negative: Short battery life; weak face ID.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; nice cameras; decent hardware. Negative: Short battery life; weak face ID.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2019
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Fredzone FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 80% display: 75% mobility: 95% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Hitek FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: Hitek FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Clubic FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Clubic FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/28/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2019
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2019
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: 90 Sekund PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; good price; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: 90 Sekund PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; good price; beautiful design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; powerful processor; great display; excellent cameras; long battery life; nice connectivity. Negative: Plastic case; slippery; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/04/2019
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; powerful processor; great display; excellent cameras; long battery life; nice connectivity. Negative: Plastic case; slippery; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/04/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; big screen; bright display; nice cameras; decent hardware; support NFC. Negative: Plastic case; only microUSB port.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; big screen; great display; good autonomy; fast charging; support NFC; attractive price. Negative: Only microUSB port; plastic case; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; big screen; bright display; nice cameras; decent hardware; support NFC. Negative: Plastic case; only microUSB port.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; big screen; great display; good autonomy; fast charging; support NFC; attractive price. Negative: Only microUSB port; plastic case; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; powerful processor; nice display; good connectivity; attractive price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; powerful processor; nice display; good connectivity; attractive price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/17/2019
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; compact size; high performance; great display; nice main camera. Negative: Poor selfie camera; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; compact size; high performance; great display; nice main camera. Negative: Poor selfie camera; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/25/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful processor; nice dual cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; powerful processor; nice dual cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Source: Mobility.bg BU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice design; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: Mobility.bg BU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice design; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/25/2019
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 61% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 61% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 60%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro →EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; modern design; nice cameras; good price. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2019
Source: Computerblog.ro →EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; modern design; nice cameras; good price. Negative: Short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/07/2019
Huawei P Smart Plus 2019
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P Smart Plus 2019Processor: HiSilicon Kirin 710
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Display: 6.21 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.16kg
Price: 259 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
You'd almost have to look with a magnifying glass to find the differences between the Huawei P Smart 2019 and the P Smart Plus 2019. Find out in our test whether the Plus model is worth the small additional price.
Foreign Reviews
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% features: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Hartware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 100% performance: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Hartware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 100% performance: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2019
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/03/2019
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice main camera; beautiful display; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Only 3GB RAM; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2019
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice main camera; beautiful display; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Only 3GB RAM; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/03/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 84% features: 70% display: 76% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 84% features: 70% display: 76% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Huawei P Smart Z 2019
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P Smart Z 2019Processor: HiSilicon Kirin 710
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Display: 6.59 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.197kg
Price: 300 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The pop-up camera has arrived in the mid-range. The P Smart Z from Huawei combines premium features such as the pop-up camera with a price in the mid-range segment. However, the implementation of the Huawei smartphones is not always successful and still leaves room for improvements.
Foreign Reviews
Source: A1 Blog DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2019
Source: A1 Blog DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/18/2019
Source: Connect - 8/19
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 64% mobility: 95% ergonomy: 57%
Source: Connect - 8/19
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 07/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 64% mobility: 95% ergonomy: 57%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% features: 83% display: 88% mobility: 98%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% features: 83% display: 88% mobility: 98%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% features: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Netzwelt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68% features: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2019
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/25/2019
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 60%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 78% display: 83% mobility: 9.% workmanship: 85%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 78% display: 83% mobility: 9.% workmanship: 85%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice performance; elegant display; long battery life; attractive price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice performance; elegant display; long battery life; attractive price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2019
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% features: 80% display: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 85% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 72% display: 69% mobility: 85% workmanship: 72%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 72% display: 69% mobility: 85% workmanship: 72%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 68% features: 92%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 68% features: 92%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent display; powerful hardware; impressive cameras; stylish design; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; excellent display; powerful hardware; impressive cameras; stylish design; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/09/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; excellent display; good price; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/26/2019
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive cameras; excellent display; good price; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/26/2019
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% mobility: 90%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 80% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice display; frameless design; great cameras; excellent autonomy; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice display; frameless design; great cameras; excellent autonomy; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/10/2019
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display; decent processor; long battery life; NFC.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display; decent processor; long battery life; NFC.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/03/2019
Source: Yamobi RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Solid workmanship; big screen; nice display; good selfie camera; long battery life; fast chaging. Negative: Heavy and bulky; marked case; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2019
Source: Yamobi RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Solid workmanship; big screen; nice display; good selfie camera; long battery life; fast chaging. Negative: Heavy and bulky; marked case; combined slot.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2019
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; beautiful display; great main cameras; high performance; fast system; long battery life. Negative: Relatively heavy and bulky; inflexible fingerprint sensor; photo quality in low light.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/29/2019
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; beautiful display; great main cameras; high performance; fast system; long battery life. Negative: Relatively heavy and bulky; inflexible fingerprint sensor; photo quality in low light.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/29/2019
Source: Alt om Data DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 100% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Alt om Data DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 100% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/23/2019
Rating: Total score: 72%
Huawei P smart Pro
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P smart ProProcessor: HiSilicon Kirin 710
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Display: 6.59 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.206kg
Price: 279 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The Huawei P smart Pro is the spitting image of a Huawei smartphone from last year. But not only that - Honor also introduced already another model to the market that strongly resembles the P smart Pro. Find out in our review of the P smart Pro how well the mid-range smartphone with a pop-up camera fares in our test and whether it is still worth buying.
Foreign Reviews
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: XGN NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Negative: High price; poor display; weak hardware; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2020
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Negative: High price; poor display; weak hardware; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/17/2020
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Chip Online TR TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2020
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2020
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Teknolojioku TR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; frameless display; powerful hardware; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: Teknolojioku TR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Stylish design; frameless display; powerful hardware; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/05/2020
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 86% features: 68% mobility: 82% workmanship: 81%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 86% features: 68% mobility: 82% workmanship: 81%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 86% features: 68% mobility: 82% workmanship: 81%
Source: Smartmania.cz CZ→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 86% features: 68% mobility: 82% workmanship: 81%
Source: Alt om Data DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Alt om Data DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/27/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil DK DA→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 66% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/30/2019
Rating: Total score: 68%
Huawei P Smart 2020
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P Smart 2020Processor: HiSilicon Kirin 710
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Display: 6.21 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.163kg
Price: 199 euro
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
The Huawei P Smart 2020 comes with Google Services and looks very similar to its predecessor. While it received some new colors and slightly more storage, are the few small changes sufficient enough to keep the affordable smartphone current?
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2020
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/21/2020
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2020
Source: Curved DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2020
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Inside Handy DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/31/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Computerbild DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware. Negative: Easy to scratch; unsupported waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2020
Source: Computerbild DE→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; decent hardware. Negative: Easy to scratch; unsupported waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2020
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 90%
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 90%
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice main camera; great display; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; weak GPU.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/20/2020
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice main camera; great display; powerful processor; high performance. Negative: Only 4GB RAM; weak GPU.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/20/2020
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; decent hardware; support Google services. Negative: Poor cameras; only microUSB port.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Source: Mais Tecnologia PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; decent hardware; support Google services. Negative: Poor cameras; only microUSB port.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/18/2020
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; nice performance; decent performance; NFC chip; mini jack port; microSD card slot; LED notification; great cameras; long battery life; attractive price. Negative: No USB-C; weak connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/08/2020
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; beautiful display; nice performance; decent performance; NFC chip; mini jack port; microSD card slot; LED notification; great cameras; long battery life; attractive price. Negative: No USB-C; weak connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/08/2020
Huawei P Smart S
Specifications
Notebook: Huawei P Smart SProcessor: HiSilicon Kirin 710
Graphics Adapter: ARM Mali-G51 MP4
Display: 6.30 inch, 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.163kg
Links: Huawei homepage
Price comparison
Average Score:
Foreign Reviews
Source: Log.com.tr TR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/13/2020
Rating: Total score: 83%
Comment
Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. is a Chinese telecommunications company and hardware manufacturer founded in 1987 and headquartered in Shenzhen. Huawei is a global leader in information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. Huawei provides end-to-end solutions for telecommunications networks, devices, and smartphones, as well as storage, servers, networking, and cloud computing enterprise solutions and products.
In 2014, Huawei established the Honor subsidiary brand under which certain smartphone lines are sold. The Huawei name is usually not listed for these products.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
ARM Mali-T830 MP2: Integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets with two clusters (MP2) supporting OpenGL ES 3.2.
ARM Mali-G51 MP4: Integrated mid range graphics card with 4 clusters. Beware the results in the Mate 20 Lite, that detects benchmarks and boosts the performance.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
HiSilicon :
Kirin 659: ARM-based octa-core SoC (4x Cortex-A53 max. 2.36 GHz, 4x Cortex-A53 max 1.7 GHz) with an integrated LTE modem (Cat. 13) and a ARM Mali-T830 MP2. In our benchmarks around 4% faster as the older Kirin 658.
Kirin 710: ARM based octa-core SoC containing four Cortex-A73 cores for performance tasks (up to 2.2 GHz) and four Cortex-A53 cores (up to 1.7 GHz) to save power. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an LTE radio (600 MBps down) and a ARM Mali-G51MP4 GPU. The SoC is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
76.26%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.