Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 vs Samsung Exynos 850

Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765

► remove from comparison  Helio P35 MT6765

The Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 is a mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones that was introduced late 2018. It integrates eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters (big.LITTLE). The four performance cores clock up to 2.3 GHz, the four efficiency cores with up to 1.8 GHz. The integrated graphics card is PowerVR GE8320 and clocks with up to 680 MHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x with 1500 MHz or 933 MHz LPDDR3. Furthermore, a LTE radio with Cat-7 DL (300 Mbps download) and Cat-13 UL (150 Mbps upload) and a 802.11 a/b/g/n WiFi modem is integrated.

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

ModelMediatek Helio P35 MT6765Samsung Exynos 850
Series MediatekSamsung
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A55
Series: Cortex-A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 « 1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 850 « - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A55
Allwinner A523 compare0.48 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A55
UNISOC SC9863A compare1.2 - 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores512 KB L3 Cortex-A55
Clock1800 - 2300 MHz <=2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology16 nm8 nm
FeaturesPowerVR GE8320 680MHz, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X-3200LTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo
iGPUPowerVR GE8320 ( - 680 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP1
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P35 MT6765
0.3 pt (26%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
18816 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 150     avg: 166.7     median: 168.5 (7%)     max: 173 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 539     avg: 886     median: 934.5 (2%)     max: 1022 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 165     avg: 171.3     median: 173 (1%)     max: 176 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 915     avg: 983     median: 1002 (3%)     max: 1031 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 776     avg: 851     median: 855 (9%)     max: 921 Points
987 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3834     avg: 4013     median: 3973 (4%)     max: 4232 Points
4986 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
790 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3542 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
3904 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
841 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
888 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2700 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
6455 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
3586 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
4143 Points (11%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9756     avg: 10649     median: 10849 (13%)     max: 11323 ms
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4347     avg: 4747     median: 4643 (4%)     max: 5543 Points
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (5%)     max: 5904 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 29     avg: 32     median: 31.5 (7%)     max: 36 Points
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (8%)     max: 39 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
62996 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7343 Points (23%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
24869 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
12838 Points (4%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
40692 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
85742 Points (15%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 17134     avg: 23682     median: 24259.5 (20%)     max: 29075 Points
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 19601     avg: 26565     median: 26896 (22%)     max: 32868 Points
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 5938     avg: 10313     median: 10175.5 (2%)     max: 14962 Points
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 42692     avg: 45071     median: 45483 (16%)     max: 46624 Points
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 101535     avg: 105631     median: 105734 (10%)     max: 109518 Points
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117053 Points (7%)
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (8%)     max: 146815 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
37871 Points (10%)
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (11%)     max: 43937 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
0 Points (0%)
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
603 min (11%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
5059 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2238     avg: 3957     median: 3956.5 (21%)     max: 5675 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 1780     avg: 4353     median: 4353 (9%)     max: 6926 Points
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8331 Points (13%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.3 Watt (1%)
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.1 Watt (1%)
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 124% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 27. 02:41:02

#0 checking url part for id 11371 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.072s ... 0.074s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.074s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11371 +0.018s ... 0.091s

#7 got single benchmarks 11371 +0.059s ... 0.151s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.012s ... 0.162s

#9 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.022s ... 0.184s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.184s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.167s ... 0.351s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.39s

#13 return log +0.037s ... 0.427s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)