Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

► remove Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

The Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 (also known as GMA 900) is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on the Mobile Intel 915GM chipset for Intel processors. It does not support hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) calculations (which is required for some games).

It supports DirectX 9.0 with Shader Model 2.0 (Vertex Shader are calculated in Software - by the CPU) and OpenGL 1.4. Furthermore, the chip is able to accelerate the decoding of MPEG2 videos and supports Motion Compensation.

The GMA 900 can not be described as a graphics card that is sufficient for gamers. Still Intel published a list  of games that will run (not needingly beautiful) on the notebook. Some old 3D games and especially 2D games should run without problems. The advantage of integrated graphics cards, is that they have a low power consumtion and therefore save battery life. Furthermore, the laptop may stay cooler and more silent than laptops with dedicated graphics cards. For office programs and surfing the performance is more than sufficient.

Currently there are no drivers that support Aero Glass for Windows Vista.

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

► remove

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM (with 500 MHz core speed) and 960GM (400 MHz) chipset (for Merom = Core 2 architecture). It is the successor of GMA 950. Most interesting is the integration of a fully programmable pipeline. Due to the integration of DirectX9 and DirectX 10 features (with drivers later than 15.9.0.1472), HDR and Hardware Transform & Lighning (T&L) - predecessor only had Software T&L - should be ready for Windows Vista Premium (support Aero Glass fully). Respective the data, the peformance should be clearly better than GMA 950.

The 13.5 Watt current consumption is relatively low, because it includes all chipset functions (therefore, this value is not compareable to dedicated graphics cards).

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
ManufacturerIntelIntel
GMA Series
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD (compare) 10 @ 640 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD (compare) 10 @ 533 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M (compare) 10 @ 400 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 8 @ 500 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 (compare) 4/0 cores @ 250 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 4/0 cores @ 400 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 (compare) 4 @ 400 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 (compare) 4 @ 200 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD (compare) 10 @ 640 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD (compare) 10 @ 533 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M (compare) 10 @ 400 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 8 @ 500 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 (compare) 4/0 cores @ 250 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 4/0 cores @ 400 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 (compare) 4 @ 400 MHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 (compare) 4 @ 200 MHz
CodenameGMA 900Crestline
4 / 0 8 -
Core400 MHz500 MHz
Memorymit Hauptspeicher geteilt (shared)mit Hauptspeicher geteilt (shared), max 384 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 9c, 2.0DirectX 10, 3.0
Technology130 nm90 nm
FeaturesNo Hardware Transform and Lightning Support (T&L), MPEG2 acceleration, Motion CompensationTransform and Lighting Hardware Support, 32 Bit Floating Point Precision, 16xAF, Occlusion Query, Hardware Clipping, DX10, DirectX9, OpenGl 2.0, Hardware MPEG2 und WMV9 acceleration, 300 MHz RAMDAC, 2 25-112 MHz LVDS Transmitter, 2 DVO Encoder, TV Encoder
Introduced01.03.2005 09.05.2007
Manufacturerhttp://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/g...http://www.intel.com/cd/products/service...

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 1726     avg: 3330     median: 4000 (4%)     max: 4264 Points
min: 2012     avg: 4319.1     median: 4117 (4%)     max: 6839 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 289     avg: 736     median: 877 (0%)     max: 900 Points
min: 751     avg: 1520     median: 1600 (1%)     max: 2916 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 200     avg: 234     median: 223 (0%)     max: 279 Points
min: 446     avg: 805.5     median: 848 (2%)     max: 997 Points
3DMark 06 + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
+ Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU Games
3.4 Points (57%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - GPU
3.3 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Shading 32Bit + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100

Average Benchmarks Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 → 307%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
-1  fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
6  fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
48.6  fps
high 1024x768
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
2  fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
1.6  fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
43 44 47 47 48 50 50 51 56 56 70 75 ~ 53 fps
med. 800x600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
8 8 8 8 10 10 10 11 11 13 14 14 ~ 10 fps
high 1024x768
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 ~ 3 fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
low 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
14  fps
med. 800x600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
12  fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
19  fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
low 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
30  fps
high 1024x768
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
4  fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900:
2.8  fps
357%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
5.2 8 8 8.4 8.7 9.6 9.7 12.6 12.6 13.4 15 ~ 10 fps
med. 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
8.5 9.9 13.3 ~ 11 fps
high 800x600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
8.4 9.8 12.2 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1024x768
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
7 8.2 9.5 ~ 8 fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900:
»
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900:
32.1  fps
227%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
43.6 52 53.9 58 62.6 65.3 67.1 68.5 70 73 77.7 81 82.1 82.6 83.4 101.7 120.9 ~ 73 fps
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900:
»
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100:
»

Average Gaming Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 → 100%

Average Gaming Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 → 292%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)