Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 990 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990

Samsung Exynos 990

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 990

The Samsung Exynos 990 is a mobile high-end SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung S20 line in early 2020. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M5 (Mongoose 5) cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A76 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.5 GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 2 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20/18 (2000 Mbps download, 210 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G77MP11 with 11 cores.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. In Geekbench it offers a very good single thread performance on par with the Snapdragon 865 and older Apple A11. The multi-threaded-performance is a bit below the fastest current smartphone SoCs. In Geekbench 5 it slots in below the Kirin 990 and above the older Snapdragon 855 Plus.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process.

HiSilicon Kirin 990

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 990

The HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the Huawei Mate 30 Pro in late 2019. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. The performance cluster contains two Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.86 GHz, the balanced cluster contains also two Cortex-A76 cores but with only up to 2.09 GHz and finally the power saving cluster contains four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.86 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a neural processor (1 + 1 cores) for AI tasks and a ARM Mali-G76 MP16 GPU clcoked at up to 600 MHz. Compared to the 5G version, the 4G Kirin 990 integrates a fast 4G modem and is slightly lower clocked (2 of the 3 clusters and the GPU).

The Kirin 990 is produced in the modern 7nm process at TSMC.

ModelSamsung Exynos 990HiSilicon Kirin 990
SeriesSamsung ExynosHiSilicon
CodenameExynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock2000 - 2730 MHz <=2860 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G77MP11 GPU, 2x Samsung Mongoose 5 Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A76, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR5-5500 Memory ControllerARM Mali-G76MP16 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz) + 2x Cortex-A76 (2.36) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.95 GHz, big.LITTLE), 4G Modem
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 « - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Transistors8000 Million
iGPUARM Mali-G76 MP16 ( - 600 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 990
1 pt (77%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 990
min: 1.067     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (82%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27431     avg: 37265     median: 39747.5 (33%)     max: 42135 Points
min: 19565     avg: 31512     median: 31512 (27%)     max: 43459 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4063     avg: 4284     median: 4273 (17%)     max: 4495 Points
min: 4756     avg: 5166     median: 5166 (20%)     max: 5576 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3935     avg: 4240     median: 4247 (49%)     max: 4455 Points
min: 4702     avg: 4918     median: 4917.5 (56%)     max: 5133 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 903     avg: 929     median: 940 (40%)     max: 944 Points
min: 759     avg: 770     median: 770 (32%)     max: 781 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2731     avg: 2800     median: 2787 (5%)     max: 2899 Points
min: 2893     avg: 2978     median: 2977.5 (5%)     max: 3062 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
783 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3059 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4791     avg: 4878     median: 4878 (49%)     max: 4965 Points
min: 3865     avg: 3882     median: 3881.5 (39%)     max: 3898 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12557     avg: 12559     median: 12559 (14%)     max: 12561 Points
min: 11885     avg: 12083     median: 12082.5 (13%)     max: 12280 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4761 Points (65%)
3910 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12169 Points (30%)
11615 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
9220 Points (14%)
10281 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2746 Points (41%)
3272 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3463 Points (28%)
3891 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7366 Points (67%)
5595 Points (51%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
16423 Points (32%)
19729 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8407 Points (17%)
9053 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
10510 Points (27%)
11581 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2294     avg: 2387     median: 2345 (3%)     max: 2511 ms
min: 1963     avg: 2154     median: 2154 (3%)     max: 2345 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
478.8 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18094     avg: 19019     median: 19122 (17%)     max: 20022 Points
min: 19885     avg: 21727     median: 21726.5 (20%)     max: 23568 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 86     avg: 94.4     median: 97 (20%)     max: 102 Points
min: 97     avg: 108     median: 108 (23%)     max: 119 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 14541     avg: 61956     median: 72814 (61%)     max: 79291 Points
min: 70955     avg: 85363     median: 85363 (71%)     max: 99771 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 70388     avg: 81327     median: 80945 (65%)     max: 91469 Points
min: 62954     avg: 81672     median: 81672 (66%)     max: 100390 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 77884     avg: 180239     median: 207238 (38%)     max: 214615 Points
min: 110095     avg: 135414     median: 135414 (25%)     max: 160733 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 123376     avg: 146474     median: 150214 (54%)     max: 157764 Points
min: 136219     avg: 143683     median: 143682 (52%)     max: 151146 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 296746     avg: 469996     median: 504192 (49%)     max: 527820 Points
min: 409039     avg: 446132     median: 446132 (43%)     max: 483224 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
653269 Points (40%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
173967 Points (48%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
261357 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 6116     avg: 6221     median: 6178 (33%)     max: 6370 Points
min: 5756     avg: 7469     median: 7469 (39%)     max: 9182 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 16279     avg: 16886     median: 16672 (36%)     max: 17707 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 10008     avg: 10612     median: 10431 (68%)     max: 11784 Points
min: 8636     avg: 9479     median: 9479 (62%)     max: 10322 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 13627     avg: 14391     median: 14551 (73%)     max: 14760 Points
min: 10918     avg: 12433     median: 12432.5 (62%)     max: 13947 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
507 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 990 → 100% n=28

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 990 → 103% n=28

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 14. 11:46:57

#0 checking url part for id 11939 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11510 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.097s ... 0.099s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.099s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11939 +0.019s ... 0.118s

#7 got single benchmarks 11939 +0.024s ... 0.142s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11510 +0.013s ... 0.156s

#9 got single benchmarks 11510 +0.017s ... 0.173s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.173s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.229s ... 0.402s

#12 return log +0.039s ... 0.441s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)