Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 680

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (SD680, SM6225) is a mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 265 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.4 GHz (Kryo 265 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 265 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together. Compared to the older Snapdragon 665, the clock speeds are higher.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X11 LTE modem with up to 390 Mbps download).

The SoC is produced in 6nm (compared to the older 11nm LPP process of the similar Snapdragon 665).

ModelSamsung Exynos 850Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
CodenameCortex-A55Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Clock <=2000 MHz1800 - 2400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology8 nm6 nm
FeaturesLTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, GalileoAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Spectra 346 ISP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G compare1.9 - 2.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G « 1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
18816 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2042     avg: 2108     median: 2109 (20%)     max: 2168 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2015     avg: 2091     median: 2079 (24%)     max: 2190 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 412     avg: 420.2     median: 415 (10%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 865     avg: 1253     median: 1420 (6%)     max: 1450 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 119     avg: 167.3     median: 178 (7%)     max: 183 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 519     avg: 900     median: 1042 (2%)     max: 1087 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
987 Points (10%)
min: 1634     avg: 1779     median: 1818.5 (18%)     max: 1844 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4986 Points (5%)
min: 4238     avg: 5563     median: 5636 (6%)     max: 6741 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
min: 2459.4     avg: 2958     median: 3028.6 (4%)     max: 3460.5 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (4%)     max: 5904 Points
min: 6358     avg: 12138     median: 12402 (9%)     max: 16498 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
min: 41     avg: 53.8     median: 52.5 (14%)     max: 68 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (7%)     max: 39 Points
min: 58     avg: 71.6     median: 67 (12%)     max: 94 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (6%)     max: 146815 Points
min: 201810     avg: 229317     median: 223076 (11%)     max: 274001 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (10%)     max: 43937 Points
min: 57249     avg: 74107     median: 77473 (19%)     max: 83512 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 287727     avg: 311635     median: 317448 (10%)     max: 329731 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 102827     avg: 104526     median: 105323 (11%)     max: 105428 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8331 Points (4%)
min: 14191     avg: 18823     median: 18857 (8%)     max: 23921 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4894     avg: 5492     median: 5739 (21%)     max: 6065 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 24.93     avg: 35.6     median: 35.7 (24%)     max: 45.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 233.04     avg: 452.2     median: 424.4 (12%)     max: 727 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 21.73     avg: 25.9     median: 23.6 (11%)     max: 34.5 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 680 +
min: 276.09     avg: 520     median: 557 (14%)     max: 690.35 MB/s
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G → 179% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 20. 07:52:10

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14151 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760939530s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:20:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14151 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 14151 +0.016s ... 0.029s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.049s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)