Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

DxOMark: The Samsung Galaxy A50 fails to impress

Samsung Galaxy A50 fails to impress in DxOMark
Samsung Galaxy A50
The triple camera setup of the Galaxy A50 failed to impress on DxOMark, although its specs are impressive. According to DxOMark, the images produced by this Samsung phone lack detail, the autofocus often fails to work in low-light conditions, geometric shift and localized low detail artifacts are also visible quite frequently.
Codrut Nistor,
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

In theory, a 25 MP sensor with f/1.7 combined with an ultra-wide 8 MP sensor and a 5 MP one for depth-sensing tasks, both with f/2.2, should deliver excellent image quality for a mid-range device right now. Sadly, the Samsung Galaxy A50 fails to do so — at least according to DxOMark's review.

The overall score is 83, with 85 the result for the photo tests and only 79 for shooting videos. Although this does not do much for the Galaxy A50 when it has to face other mid-range handsets that go for about the same price, it is worth mentioning that some older flagships managed similar scores: 82 points for the Galaxy S6 Edge and 85 for the Apple iPhone 7.

For both the photo and video tests, the Galaxy A50 managed to achieve a good noise level and pleasant colors. Unfortunately, the drawbacks are also similar for both areas and they include a low level of detail, various artifacts, autofocus failures in low-light conditions (photo) and frequent refocusing and overshooting in all environments (video), and so on. In the end, the result is what usually applies to mid-range devices: if the lighting conditions are good, the Galaxy A50 can achieve good results, but cloudy and low-light conditions should be avoided.

What would you choose instead of the Galaxy A50 for about the same price? Feel free to drop your thoughts in the comments section below, as usual.

Source(s)

Read all 5 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Codrut Nistor
Codrut Nistor - Senior Tech Writer - 5436 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
In my early school days, I hated writing and having to make up stories. A decade later, I started to enjoy it. Since then, I published a few offline articles and then I moved to the online space, where I contributed to major websites that are still present online as of 2021 such as Softpedia, Brothersoft, Download3000, but I also wrote for multiple blogs that have disappeared over the years. I've been riding with the Notebookcheck crew since 2013 and I am not planning to leave it anytime soon. In love with good mechanical keyboards, vinyl and tape sound, but also smartphones, streaming services, and digital art.
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > News > News Archive > Newsarchive 2019 07 > DxOMark: The Samsung Galaxy A50 fails to impress
Codrut Nistor, 2019-07- 5 (Update: 2019-07- 5)