Notebookcheck Logo

MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs HiSilicon Kirin 960s

MediaTek Dimensity 800U

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 800U

The Mediatek Dimensity 800U is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.4 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 3 core ARM Mali-G57 MC3 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller, a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

Compared to the Dimensity 820, the 800U offers lower clocked A76 cores and a slower GPU.

The Dimensity 800U is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 960s

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 960S is an ARM based mid-range octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the 2018 10.5-inch Huawei MediaPad M5. Compared to the normal Kirin 960, the 960S offers an additional NPU for AI calculations from the Kirin 970. Looks like to be slower clocked than the older Kirin 960.

Besides 8 CPU cores (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53), the SoC is also equipped with a modern Mali-G71 MP8 graphics adapter, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller as well as an LTE Cat. 12/13 modem. It is one of the fastest ARM SoCs in the end of 2016. The Kirin 960 is manufactured in a modern 16-nm process at TSMC.

ModelMediaTek Dimensity 800UHiSilicon Kirin 960s
SeriesMediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Cortex-A73/-A53
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U « 2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T820 compare2.1 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T765 compare2.1 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T750 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2000 - 2400 MHz2100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm16 nm
Features2x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.4 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x SupportARM Mali-G71 MP8 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP3ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ( - 900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 800U
0.6 pt (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
22364 Points (19%)
14698 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3205     avg: 3320     median: 3259 (38%)     max: 3497 Points
2323 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3095     avg: 3281     median: 3236 (37%)     max: 3512 Points
2101 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 596     avg: 600     median: 599 (25%)     max: 606 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1776     avg: 1785     median: 1779.5 (3%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
1634 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
5809 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5609 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5734 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1756 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4054 Points (33%)
2165 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4655 Points (42%)
3780 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12938 Points (25%)
10498 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6203 Points (12%)
5303 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
8035 Points (21%)
6502 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3013     avg: 3669     median: 3298 (4%)     max: 4695 ms
5947 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9999     avg: 14917     median: 16629 (15%)     max: 18123 Points
6802 Points (6%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 45     avg: 50     median: 47 (10%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
147305 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
8364 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
28103 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
33870 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
43350 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
113687 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
64343 Points (54%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
72545 Points (58%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
89035 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
105171 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
331094 Points (32%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
366649 Points (22%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
103228 Points (28%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 3336     avg: 12939     median: 12938.5 (2%)     max: 22541 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
17258 Points (27%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7087     avg: 7337     median: 7337 (34%)     max: 7587 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3228 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
19054 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8738     avg: 9893     median: 9892.5 (65%)     max: 11047 Points
5114 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 10527     avg: 13283     median: 13283 (66%)     max: 16039 Points
5040 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 800U → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960s → 68% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 23:50:01

#0 checking url part for id 12955 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 May 2024 05:37:27 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.089s ... 0.09s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.09s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12955 +0.015s ... 0.104s

#7 got single benchmarks 12955 +0.02s ... 0.124s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.003s ... 0.127s

#9 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.006s ... 0.133s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.133s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.043s ... 0.176s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.182s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.09s ... 0.272s

#14 return log +0.022s ... 0.294s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)