Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N4500 vs Intel Celeron N5100

Intel Celeron N4500

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4500

The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The two Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading. The N4500 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured on the first-gen 10 nm Intel process.

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could is up two 30% better on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the dual-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 16 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 750 MHz and a dual-channel DDR4 / quad-channel LPDDR4(x) memory controller (up to 16 GB, up to 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

The average N4500 in our database shapes up to be a very slow processor, its multi-thread benchmark scores only just matching those of Intel Core i3-4010U. (The latter saw the light of day in 2013 as a lower mid-range, dual-core CPU designed for use in ultraportable laptops.) In other words, expect the Celeron to be painfully slow in all but the most basic activities such as writing work-related e-mails.

Power consumption

Just like nearly all other N-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 6 W. This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs.

This Intel CPU is built with Intel's first-generation 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N5100

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5100

The Intel Celeron N5100 is a quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake series that is primarily intended for inexpensive notebooks and was announced in early 2021. The four Tremont CPU cores clock between 1.1 and 2.8 GHz (single core Burst) and offer no HyperThreading (SMT). The N5100 uses 1.5 MB L2 and 4 MB L3 cache. The chip is manufactured in 10nm at Intel (most likely in the same process as Ice Lake).

Architecture

The processor architecture is called Tremont and a complete redesign compared to the old Golmont Plus cores in the predecessor. According to Intel, the single thread performance of a core could be improved by 30% on average (10 - 80% in all tests of SPECint and SPECfp).

Features

In addition to the quad-core CPU block, the SoC integrates a 24 EU Intel UHD Graphics GPU clocked from 350 - 800 MHz and a LPDDR4(x) dual channel memory controller (up to 16 GB and 2933 MHz). The chip now also partly integrates Wi-Fi 6 (Gig+), 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes, 14 USB 2.0/ 3.2 ports and two SATA 6.0 ports. The package got bigger and measures 35 x 24 mm (compared to 25 x 24 mm for the N5030 e.g.). The SoC is directly soldered to the mainboard (BGA) and can't be easily replaced.

Performance

Thanks to the new CPU architecture, the performance of the N5100 should be slightly faster compared to the old Pentium N5030. The Pentium N6000 however offers clearly higher clock speeds and also a faster gPU. However, it should still lag behind modern Core processors of the Tiger Lake generation. Therefore, the CPU is intended for basic tasks like office suits, web browsing with moderate multitasking.

Power Consumption

Just like most other N-class Intel processors, the Celeron has a 6 W default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is rather low; a small metal plate is all it takes to dissipate heat generated by such a CPU.

Intel Celeron N5100 is manufactured on Intel's first-generation 10 nm process for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron N4500Intel Celeron N5100
SeriesIntel Jasper LakeIntel Jasper Lake
CodenameJasper LakeJasper Lake
Series: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 « 1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock1100 - 2800 MHz1100 - 2800 MHz
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 4
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1338FCBGA1338
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics (16 EUs, 350 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 16 GB Quad-Channel LPDDR4x-2933Intel UHD Graphics (24 EUs, 350 - 800 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 16 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR4x-2933
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (350 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Jasper Lake Celeron N4500Intel Jasper Lake Celeron N5100

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4500
18.1 pt (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
709 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
452 Points (20%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
188 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
332 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
171 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
82 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6954 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
5266 Points (29%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1270 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
50.2 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1076 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
5394 MIPS (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2853 MIPS (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
12 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
60.6 fps (14%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
4249 Seconds (30%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
2.1 sec (46%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.8 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
51.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1132 s (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1507 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1521 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
2017 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
504 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 401     avg: 499.5     median: 499.5 (22%)     max: 598 Points
631 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 707     avg: 885     median: 885 (3%)     max: 1063 Points
1788 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3160 ms (4%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
48.2 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.7 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
9.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.5 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
18.7 Points per Watt (22%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4500 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N5100 → 164% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 28. 07:55:17

#0 checking url part for id 13079 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13077 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13079 +0.015s ... 0.037s

#7 got single benchmarks 13079 +0.019s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13077 +0.002s ... 0.058s

#9 got single benchmarks 13077 +0.015s ... 0.073s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.123s ... 0.196s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.222s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)