Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J4105 vs Intel Core 3 N355 vs Intel Celeron N4000

Intel Celeron J4105

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron J4105

The Intel Celeron J4105 is a quad-core desktop SoC primarily for mini PCs and mini ITX mainboards. It runs at 1.5 - 2.5 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a new generation of monitor outputs (Gen 10) and a partly integrated WiFi chip. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the J4105 as of August 2023, we have tested a certain number of laptops featuring the Celeron N4120, a chip with very similar specs (4 cores, 4 threads, up to 2.6 GHz). Based on that, expect the J4105 to be very slow in all but the most basic activities.

Intel Core 3 N355

► remove from comparison Intel Core 3 N355

The Intel Core 3 N355 (sometimes referred to as the Intel Processor N355) is a mobile processor of the Twin Lake family which is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The chip is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs; it offers 8 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.9 GHz but no Performance cores.

The E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

The performance of the Core 3 CPU depends heavily on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Provided both are good enough, it will deliver multi-thread benchmark cores on par with older quad-core CPUs like the Ryzen 3 5300U and Core i7-1165G7, which should be enough to run most day-to-day tasks in 2025. Its single-core performance is much less impressive due to the lack of P-cores.

The Alder Lake-N Core i3-N305 (8 cores, up to 3.8 GHz) that was introduced in early 2023 should be just a few percentage points slower than the N355.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 32 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.35 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for older games and fairly low resolutions. GTA V is perfectly playable at 768p on Medium.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The Intel Core 3 N355 is supposed to consume 15 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. While no data on PL2 has been provided, we do know that Asus has given the Core 3 a power limit of 35 watts (PL2) in the NUC 14 Essential.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

Intel Celeron N4000

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N4000

The Intel Celeron N4000 is a dual-core SoC designed for affordable laptops and mini-PCs and was announced late 2017. It runs at 1.1 GHz to 2.6 GHz (Single Core Burst, Multi Core Burst maxes out at 2.5 GHz) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured on a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, all in a smaller package. Partial Wi-Fi 5 support is baked into the chip. Besides two CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture was slightly reworked and is now called Goldmont Plus. It features a larger L2 cache (4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not anywhere near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N4000 in our database only just matches the Core i5-4300Y, a fairly old dual-core processor of nearly the same energy efficiency, in multi-thread performance. In other words, the Celeron is a very slow processor that's good enough for the most basic of tasks only. Expect long load times no matter the app.

Graphics

The UHD Graphics 600 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Generation 9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 12 EUs and a clock of up to 650 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 500 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most other N-class Intel chips, the Celeron N4000 has a 6 W TDP (also known as the long-term power limit). This is not much at all, allowing laptop makers to build passively cooled laptops, tablets, mini-PCs around the chip. The SoC can briefly consume up to 15 W, though, depending on how a system is configured.

Last but not the least, this Celeron is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes leading to poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron J4105Intel Core 3 N355Intel Celeron N4000
CodenameGemini LakeTwin LakeGemini Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Gemini Lake
Series: Gemini Lake Gemini Lake
Intel Celeron J4105 « 1.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N40001.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 3 N355 « 3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Celeron J41051.5 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N50001.1 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J40052 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J41151.8 - 2.5 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N41001.1 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4000 « 1.1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1500 - 2500 MHz3000 - 3900 MHz1100 - 2600 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
2 / 2
TDP10 Watt15 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1090BGA1264BGA1090
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGX
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) ( - 1350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 600 (200 - 650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache768 KB
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core 3 N355
27.2 pt (45%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron N4000
14.7 pt (24%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
66 Points (37%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
334 Points (6%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
5262 Points (5%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1039 Points (44%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
393 Points (43%)
160 Points (17%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2015 Points (5%)
273 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
270 Points (2%)
822 Points (5%)
min: 121     avg: 132.7     median: 138 (1%)     max: 139 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
73 Points (20%)
168 Points (47%)
min: 65     avg: 70.3     median: 70.9 (20%)     max: 75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
11.2 Points (14%)
1.7 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.1 Points (49%)
0.9 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5770 Points (35%)
2152 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
26431 Points (19%)
4030 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
40876 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
9010 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
242.2 s (3%)
1007 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.3 s (2%)
31.9 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3463 Points (5%)
760 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
23225 MIPS (13%)
4114 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4044 MIPS (48%)
2298 MIPS (27%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
57.6 fps (19%)
9.5 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
209 fps (48%)
47.3 fps (11%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
5.9 fps (10%)
0.8 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (16%)
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.1 GB/s (19%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.9 GB/s (15%)
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1121 Seconds (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
574 Seconds (4%)
4736 Seconds (33%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
1.7 sec (36%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8507 Points (18%)
2259 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.1 s (4%)
25.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
35.5 s (2%)
57.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1295 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
28501 Points (22%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
9920 Points (24%)
min: 1638     avg: 1713     median: 1712.5 (4%)     max: 1787 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
57287 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
57560 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
62307 Points (52%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8433 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
11682 Points (21%)
1974 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3827 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1389 Points (16%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1319     avg: 1332     median: 1331.5 (33%)     max: 1344 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 4513     avg: 4801     median: 4800.5 (19%)     max: 5088 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1082 Points (42%)
min: 431     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (17%)     max: 436 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
4903 Points (9%)
min: 797     avg: 802     median: 801.5 (1%)     max: 806 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1073 Points (5%)
434 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4891 Points (15%)
791 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4824 Points (48%)
1862 Points (19%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
18845 Points (19%)
3219 Points (3%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
968 ms (1%)
min: 2306     avg: 2382     median: 2381.5 (3%)     max: 2457 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
446.5 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
15679 Points (12%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
149.3 Points (41%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
182.4 Points (33%)
min: 71.2     avg: 78.6     median: 78.6 (14%)     max: 86 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6152 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22786 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7604 Points (50%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10205 Points (51%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
907 Points (34%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
35.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
23.1 Points per Watt (17%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron J4105 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 3 N355 → 267% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N4000 → 74% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 25. 06:05:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9928 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18745 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 9426 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753416313s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:17:52 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9928 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 9928 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18745 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#11 got single benchmarks 18745 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 9426 +0.003s ... 0.023s

#13 got single benchmarks 9426 +0.013s ... 0.035s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.04s ... 0.076s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)