Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium B980 vs Intel Core i5-480M vs Intel Core i5-460M

Intel Pentium B980

► remove from comparison Intel B980

The Intel Pentium B980 is a dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost for the CPU part, HyperThreading, AES, Virtualization (VT-x and VT-d), Trusted Execution or Intel Quick Sync are deactivated. The Pentium B980 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the desktop HD Graphics 2000 clocked at 650 / 1150 (with Turbo Boost).

The performance of the Pentium B980 should be clearly faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU. Due to the high clock speed, the missing HyperThreading and smaller last level cache should be equalized and therefore, the performance should be similar to a Intel Core i3-2310M with 2.1 GHz.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and DDR3-1333 memory controller.

Intel Core i5-480M

► remove from comparison Intel 480M

The Intel Core i5-480M is a mid-range dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.66 to 2.9 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 480M does most likely not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.9 versus 3.06 GHz). However, the base clock rate is slightly higher.

A feature of the new Core i5-480M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-480M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-480M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

Intel Core i5-460M

► remove from comparison Intel 460M

The Intel Core i5-460M is a high end dual core CPU for laptops and clocks (due to the Turbo Mode) from 2.53 to 2.8 GHz. Each core is based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture. Hyperthreading enables the Dual Core CPU to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the Core i5-540M, the 460M does not support AES, VT-d and Trusted Execution functions and features a slower Turbo Boost (2.8 versus 3.06 GHz).

A feature of the new Core i5-460M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the Core i5-460M is on average faster than a 2.8 GHz Core 2 Duo T9800 and in some benchmarks even faster than the fastest Core 2 Duo T9900 (e.g. 3DMark 06 CPU Score). Therefore, the Core i5-460M is a high end dual core cpu which should handle all daily work and gaming tasks. Only the quad core i7 CPUs can be noticeably faster at tasks that require four or more threads (e.g. rendering).

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 is likely to use the whole TDP of 35 Watt under load and therefore can use more power than a similar specified Core 2 Duo. In Idle mode, the i5 uses clearly less power than the Core 2 Duo CPUs.

ModelIntel Pentium B980Intel Core i5-480MIntel Core i5-460M
CodenameSandy BridgeArrandaleArrandale
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Core i5Intel Core i5
Series: Core i5 Arrandale
Intel Pentium B980 « 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9602.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium B9402 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9971.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9871.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9771.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9671.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium 9571.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M « 2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-580M2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M « 2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Clock2400 MHz2666 - 2933 MHz2530 - 2800 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 42 / 4
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors624 Million382+177 Million382+177 Million
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
Die Size149 mm281+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketrPGA988BBGA1288, PGA988BGA1288, PGA988
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controllerintegrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics (500-766MHz), MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-xintegrated DDR3 memory controller, GMA HD Graphics, MMX, SSE (1,2,3,3S, 4.1, 3.2), EM64T, VT-x
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$125 U.S.
Announced
FSB24002400
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
B980 +
min: 1.79     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (2%)     max: 1.85 Points
126%
480M +
min: 2.18     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.37 Points
125%
460M +
min: 1.7     avg: 2.2     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 B980 +
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.95 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
B980 +
min: 3054     avg: 3098     median: 3109 (19%)     max: 3118 Points
103%
480M +
min: 3130     avg: 3192     median: 3191 (19%)     max: 3248 Points
min: 2971     avg: 3106     median: 3080 (19%)     max: 3491 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
B980 +
min: 5027     avg: 5715     median: 5878.5 (4%)     max: 6075 Points
120%
480M +
min: 6939     avg: 7187     median: 7080 (5%)     max: 7553 Points
121%
460M +
min: 6634     avg: 7073     median: 7085 (5%)     max: 7898 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
B980 +
min: 7167     avg: 7278     median: 7304 (5%)     max: 7337 Points
117%
480M +
min: 8159     avg: 8558     median: 8556 (5%)     max: 8969 Points
116%
460M +
min: 8060     avg: 8437     median: 8468 (5%)     max: 9160 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
B980 +
min: 3802     avg: 3835     median: 3825.5 (5%)     max: 3885 Points
102%
480M +
min: 3831     avg: 3928     median: 3912 (5%)     max: 4030 Points
100%
460M +
min: 3569     avg: 3807     median: 3818.5 (5%)     max: 4034 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
B980 +
min: 1028     avg: 1044     median: 1037 (12%)     max: 1072 s
186%
480M +
min: 539     avg: 564     median: 557 (7%)     max: 600 s
180%
460M +
min: 515     avg: 596     median: 575 (7%)     max: 837 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
B980 +
min: 32.43     avg: 33     median: 32.9 (7%)     max: 33.67 s
183%
480M +
min: 17     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 19.19 s
177%
460M +
min: 16.7     avg: 19.4     median: 18.6 (4%)     max: 27 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 B980 +
1435 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 B980 +
10 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 B980 +
55 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 B980 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 B980 +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 B980 +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
B980 +
min: 2424     avg: 2453     median: 2462.5 (5%)     max: 2464 Points
120%
480M +
min: 2579     avg: 2880     median: 2954 (6%)     max: 3093 Points
120%
460M +
min: 2770     avg: 2938     median: 2945 (6%)     max: 3142 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
B980 +
min: 16.64     avg: 16.9     median: 16.9 (4%)     max: 17.26 s
113%
480M +
min: 15     avg: 15     median: 15 (3%)     max: 15.2 s
106%
460M +
min: 14.09     avg: 16     median: 16 (3%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
B980 +
min: 37.02     avg: 38     median: 38 (2%)     max: 38.97 s
106%
480M +
min: 35     avg: 36.1     median: 36 (2%)     max: 37 s
103%
460M +
min: 33.03     avg: 37.3     median: 37 (2%)     max: 42.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
B980 +
min: 853     avg: 867     median: 863 (4%)     max: 886 s
101%
480M +
min: 842     avg: 852     median: 851 (4%)     max: 866 s
min: 782     avg: 918     median: 880 (4%)     max: 1521 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
B980 +
min: 26000     avg: 30567     median: 29400 (14%)     max: 36300 MIPS
130%
480M +
min: 33210     avg: 38100     median: 38100 (18%)     max: 42990 MIPS
131%
460M +
38480 MIPS (18%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
B980 +
min: 17290     avg: 17370     median: 17390 (13%)     max: 17430 MFLOPS
171%
480M +
min: 29000     avg: 29750     median: 29750 (23%)     max: 30500 MFLOPS
162%
460M +
28160 MFLOPS (22%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 480M +
7718 Points (16%)
89%
1 460M +
min: 5942     avg: 6910     median: 6880 (14%)     max: 7682 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
B980 +
6.1 Points (78%)
113%
480M +
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
113%
460M +
min: 6.8     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (88%)     max: 6.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
B980 +
min: 5597     avg: 5678     median: 5699.5 (4%)     max: 5717 Points
138%
480M +
min: 7113     avg: 7765     median: 7845 (6%)     max: 8255 Points
137%
460M +
min: 6382     avg: 7659     median: 7826 (6%)     max: 7985 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
B980 +
min: 2196     avg: 2204     median: 2203.5 (5%)     max: 2211 Points
124%
480M +
min: 2640     avg: 2744     median: 2741 (7%)     max: 2854 Points
117%
460M +
min: 2402     avg: 2583     median: 2587 (6%)     max: 2756 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 B980 +
3855 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 B980 +
3745 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 B980 +
3798 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 B980 +
3624 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 B980 +
3732 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium B980 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-480M → 128% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-460M → 125% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 16. 00:19:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3332 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1519 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 1214 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752617972s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 13 Jul 2025 05:20:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3332 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 3332 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1519 +0s ... 0.005s

#11 got single benchmarks 1519 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1214 +0s ... 0.008s

#13 got single benchmarks 1214 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.03s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.03s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)