Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 630 vs Samsung Xclipse 940

Qualcomm Adreno 630

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 630 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SoC for smartphones. It was introduced in early 2018 and can be found in high-end Android smartphones. 

According to Qualcomm 30% faster than the old Adreno 540 in the Snapdragon 835 with 30% less power consumption.

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 630Samsung Xclipse 940
Xclipse 900 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 compare @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology10 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement12.02.2018 09.10.2023
CPU in Adreno 630GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8508 x 2750 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8458 x 2800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 36810     avg: 78986     median: 81385.5 (8%)     max: 85487 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
27848 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
3108 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
6347 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
770 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
821 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
30971 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4034     avg: 5761     median: 6083 (26%)     max: 6568 Points
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5228     avg: 7671     median: 8245 (18%)     max: 8451 Points
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 3512     avg: 4589     median: 4765 (20%)     max: 5200 Points
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4133     avg: 5424     median: 5673 (14%)     max: 8206 Points
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4363     avg: 5811     median: 6118 (54%)     max: 6454 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 5637     avg: 7763     median: 8179 (49%)     max: 8312 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 3197     avg: 4388     median: 4617 (23%)     max: 4734 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 3488     avg: 4919     median: 5158 (17%)     max: 5246 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
2636 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
3037 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 630
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
257 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 15.6     median: 14 (3%)     max: 31 fps
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 29     avg: 35.2     median: 37 (3%)     max: 38 fps
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 25     avg: 33.4     median: 35 (3%)     max: 35 fps
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 20.63     avg: 52.5     median: 58 (1%)     max: 61 fps
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 54     avg: 73.1     median: 75 (3%)     max: 83 fps
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 630
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 88.2     avg: 140.2     median: 150 (1%)     max: 152 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 10791     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (4%)     max: 13082 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 4195     avg: 4225     median: 4225 (7%)     max: 4255 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 384% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
Hearthstone

Hearthstone

2020
low 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 630:
29.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 630:
27.8  fps
League of Legends

League of Legends

2019
low 1280x720
Adreno 630:
0 (!)  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
145%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 630:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
high
100%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 30 35 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 36 fps
164%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Adreno 630:
31 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 57 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 630:
44 58 59 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 61 ~ 59 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Adreno 630:
60 60 109 ~ 76 fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Adreno 630:
6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 630:
5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Adreno 630:
5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 630:
3  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
190%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 630:
29  fps
high
100%
Adreno 630:
30  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 630:
29 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Adreno 630:
30 30 30 30 30 30 61 ~ 34 fps
BioShock Infinite

BioShock Infinite

2013
low 1280x720
100%
Adreno 630:
20  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Adreno 630:
14  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Adreno 630:
13  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Adreno 630:
4  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 630:
101  fps
Diablo III

Diablo III

2012
low 1024x768
100%
Adreno 630:
10.3  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 630:
60  fps
Minecraft - Pocket Edition

Minecraft - Pocket Edition

2011
ultra
100%
Adreno 630:
60  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 630 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 166%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 164%

Qualcomm Adreno 630Samsung Xclipse 940
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact5955
PUBG Mobile604036875940
Dead Trigger 260114
Qualcomm Adreno 630Samsung Xclipse 940
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1

1


1
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 20. 06:43:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8780 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752986595s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 19 Jul 2025 13:29:00 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8780 +0.014s ... 0.018s

#9 got single benchmarks 8780 +0.018s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0s ... 0.037s

#11 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.005s ... 0.041s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.058s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.058s

#15 Got 109 rows for game benchmarks. +0.011s ... 0.069s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.069s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.07s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.076s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.076s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.077s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)