Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 612 vs Qualcomm Adreno 613

Qualcomm Adreno 612

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 612 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SoCs and based on the Adreno 600 architecture (like the Adreno 630, which should be fully compatible in software).

The performance is similar to the old Adreno 512 graphics card and therefore only in the lower mid-range of modern smartphone SoCs.

The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 11 (FL 11_1).

Qualcomm Adreno 613

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 613

The Adreno 613 is an entry-level graphics card, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. It is intended for use in low-cost smartphones.

The performance is on a par with the ARM Mali-G52 MP2 (e.g. Helio G85) and is just ahead of the Adreno 612 in the Snapdragon 678. Although it is the successor to the Adreno 619 in the SD 4 Gen 1, the performance is significantly lower.

It works with a maximum clock frequency of 955 MHz and is manufactured in the 4 nm process at Samsung (in the SD 4 Gen 2). It supports common graphics APIs such as OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

Qualcomm Adreno 612Qualcomm Adreno 613
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680 compare
Adreno 644 compare
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 613 @ 0.96 GHz
Adreno 612
Adreno 610 compare
ArchitectureAdreno 600Adreno 600
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, VulkanDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan
technology14 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1)OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1
Date of Announcement15.12.2015 26.06.2023
Core Speed955 MHz
CPU in Adreno 612GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6788 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6758 x 1600 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 26320     avg: 28142     median: 26734 (3%)     max: 31129 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1621     avg: 1897     median: 1737 (8%)     max: 2344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1571     avg: 1784     median: 1614 (4%)     max: 2245 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 1057     avg: 1207     median: 1110 (5%)     max: 1499 Points
1817 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 851     avg: 1030     median: 955 (2%)     max: 1303 Points
1591 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 1606     avg: 1849     median: 1745 (16%)     max: 2285 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 1427     avg: 1715     median: 1594 (10%)     max: 2173 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 937     avg: 1108     median: 978 (5%)     max: 1480 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 823     avg: 952     median: 829 (3%)     max: 1286 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
482 Points (0%)
min: 665     avg: 667     median: 667 (0%)     max: 669 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
143 Points (0%)
min: 155     avg: 159     median: 159 (0%)     max: 163 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1.7 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 3     avg: 3.6     median: 3.3 (1%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.1 (1%)     max: 10 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 8     avg: 8.5     median: 8.2 (1%)     max: 9.2 fps
9.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 14     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (0%)     max: 18 fps
19 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 20     avg: 22     median: 21 (1%)     max: 25 fps
27 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 612
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 41     avg: 43     median: 41 (0%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 613
54 fps (0%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
43224 Points (4%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
49834 Points (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
14.3 fps (0%)
17.2 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
411 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
626 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 9815     avg: 16853     median: 16853 (6%)     max: 23891 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1491     avg: 8575     median: 8575 (14%)     max: 15659 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 132% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
Adreno 613:
87.3  fps
ultra
Adreno 613:
59.6  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 613:
38.9  fps
ultra
Adreno 613:
14.4  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 612:
40  fps
98%
Adreno 613:
39  fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
30  fps
100%
Adreno 613:
29.9  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 612:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 612:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
high
100%
Adreno 612:
16 30 ~ 23 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 612 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 613 → 99%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 98%

Qualcomm Adreno 613lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift87.359.6
Genshin Impact38.914.4
PUBG Mobile3929.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1



1


1
1







Qualcomm Adreno 612lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile4030
Shadow Fight 360
Dead Trigger 260
Asphalt 9: Legends2523
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
2
2









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 15. 08:00:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9876 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12697 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1736924445s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 Jan 2025 05:19:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9876 +0.01s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 9876 +0.008s ... 0.022s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12697 +0s ... 0.023s

#11 got single benchmarks 12697 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.04s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.04s

#15 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.043s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.043s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.044s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.047s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.047s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)