Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 vs Intel Core i5-14500T

AMD Ryzen 7 H 260

► remove from comparison AMD AMD R7 H 260

The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 is a high-end notebook processor from the Hawk Point series with 8 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 16 threads simultaneously. At release, the CPU is only available in China and is technically practically identical to the older AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS or Ryzen 7 7840HS (slower AI engine).

The performance of the second-fastest model in the Hawk Point series should only be slightly behind the Ryzen 9 7940HS (+100 - 200 MHz clock, e.g. only 2% slower Turbo). As a result, the performance at 54W TDP should also be comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (also 8 Zen 4 cores, max 5.1 GHz, 55W, 32 MB L3) and thus clearly ahead of the old top model AMD Ryzen 9 6980HX resp. 6980HS (with lower TDP).

The chip integrates a modern RDNA 3-based graphics card (iGPU) called Radeon 780M with 12 CUs and up to 2.7GHz including AV1 video engine. Furthermore, a Xilinx FPGA-based XDNA AI accelerator is also integrated, which is now clocked higher. Hawk Point offers 2x USB 4 (40 Gbps), 20 PCIe 4.0 lanes and a dual-channel DDR5-5600 / LPDDR5x-7500 memory controller (with ECC support).

The Hawk Point series is a single chip (unlike the Dragon Range 7045HX series) and is manufactured at TSMC using the modern 4nm FinFET process.

Intel Core i5-14500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500T is a power-efficient desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 1.7 GHz and reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture, which was introduced with Alder Lake, also benefits the Raptor Lake processors. The suffix T stands for a particularly economical CPU model and with a TDP of just 35 watts (PL1 = 35 watts), these processors are ideally suited to small, compact systems.

Performance

The low power consumption ultimately results in slightly lower performance compared to the Intel Core i5-14500. Depending on how the PL2 (92 watts) is defined, there may be noticeable differences in multi-core performance. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-14500T is superior due to the higher number of physical computing units. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500T, there is no noticeable increase in performance due to the same number of computing units.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-13500T, the Intel Core i5-14500T offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770. The iGPU of the Intel Core i5-14500T also clocks 100 MHz higher, but this does not make a noticeable difference in everyday use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-14500T is 35 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 92 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500T, nothing has changed in terms of power consumption.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 H 260Intel Core i5-14500T
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Raptor Lake
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)Intel Raptor Lake-R
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
AMD Ryzen 9 H 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T « 1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz1700 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
14 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP45 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm10 nm
Die Size178 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.intel.de
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt
$232 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-14500T
37.9 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
630 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11790 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1838 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
706 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4319 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2022 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
252 Points (70%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.6 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9014 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
39798 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
63443 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14402 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
221.3 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6846 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
45820 MIPS (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5980 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
108.1 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
264.5 fps (61%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.7 fps (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
9.8 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
513 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
288 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12986 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
408.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
54226 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15309 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
73013 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
72147 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79337 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
14441 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
20354 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8496 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2546 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
9225 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2409 Points (76%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
8952 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1838 Points (72%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9122 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1782 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8987 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7611 Points (76%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
33122 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
554 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
244 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
262 Points (47%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1493 Points (56%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.1 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
79.8 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-14500T → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 20. 15:20:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19849 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18026 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755696006s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:19:27 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19849 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 19849 +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18026 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 18026 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)