Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Celeron 807 vs Intel Celeron 847

Intel Celeron 887

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 807

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 807 is a ULV single core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 350-950 MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to other Celerons, the 807 should be faster than a Celeron B720, thanks to Hyper-Threading support.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 807 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 847

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 847 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost are deactivated. The Celeron 847 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000.

The performance of the Pentium 847 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.2 GHz Pentium U5400.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 847 is suited for small subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 807Intel Celeron 847
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B8401.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8301.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8201.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8151.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8001.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8771.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8671.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B7301.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
» Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7201.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B7101.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1500 MHz1500 MHz1100 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB1.5 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt17 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1023BGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$86 U.S.$70 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 807Intel Celeron 847

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
1.1 Points (2%)
57%
1 847 +
min: 0.57     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.72 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 887 +
0.6 Points (2%)
70%
1 847 +
min: 0.39     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.42 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 887 +
1877 Points (15%)
68%
1 847 +
min: 1094     avg: 1270     median: 1269.5 (10%)     max: 1445 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 887 +
3597 Points (4%)
67%
1 847 +
min: 2026     avg: 2408     median: 2407.5 (3%)     max: 2789 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
4497 Points (3%)
70%
1 847 +
min: 2865     avg: 3159     median: 3159 (2%)     max: 3453 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 887 +
2362 Points (13%)
71%
1 847 +
min: 1564     avg: 1679     median: 1678.5 (9%)     max: 1793 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 887 +
1626 s (19%)
84%
1 847 +
2716 s (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 887 +
48 s (10%)
93%
1 847 +
80.4 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 887 +
986 Points (6%)
84%
1 847 +
824 Points (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 887 +
0 GB/s (0%)
71%
1 847 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
69%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
75%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 887 +
1414 Points (3%)
70%
1 847 +
min: 826     avg: 993     median: 992.5 (2%)     max: 1159 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 887 +
28 s (6%)
98%
1 847 +
35.5 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 887 +
64 s (3%)
99%
1 847 +
78.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 887 +
1343 s (6%)
98%
1 847 +
1780 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 847 +
15000 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 847 +
7310 MFLOPS (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 887 +
5.1 Points (65%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 887 +
3383 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 847 +
3149 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 847 +
2541 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 847 +
1742 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 847 +
1663 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 847 +
2014 Points (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 847 +
552 ms (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 847 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 09. 03:22:48

#0 checking url part for id 3348 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3364 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2730 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 Dec 2022 16:40:39 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3348 +0.001s ... 0.022s

#8 got single benchmarks 3348 +0.007s ... 0.029s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3364 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#10 got single benchmarks 3364 +0s ... 0.031s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 2730 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#12 got single benchmarks 2730 +0.018s ... 0.05s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.09s ... 0.139s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.139s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)