Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Celeron 847

Intel Celeron 887

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 847

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 847 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost are deactivated. The Celeron 847 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000.

The performance of the Pentium 847 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.2 GHz Pentium U5400.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 847 is suited for small subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 847
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
» Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1500 MHz1100 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 847

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
887 +
1.1 Points (2%)
57%
847 +
min: 0.57     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.72 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
887 +
0.6 Points (2%)
70%
847 +
min: 0.39     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.42 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
887 +
1877 Points (17%)
68%
847 +
min: 1094     avg: 1270     median: 1269.5 (11%)     max: 1445 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
887 +
3597 Points (5%)
67%
847 +
min: 2026     avg: 2408     median: 2407.5 (3%)     max: 2789 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
887 +
4497 Points (4%)
70%
847 +
min: 2865     avg: 3159     median: 3159 (3%)     max: 3453 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
887 +
2362 Points (14%)
71%
847 +
min: 1564     avg: 1679     median: 1678.5 (10%)     max: 1793 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
887 +
1626 s (19%)
84%
847 +
2716 s (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
887 +
48 s (10%)
93%
847 +
80.4 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
887 +
986 Points (6%)
84%
847 +
824 Points (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
887 +
0 GB/s (0%)
71%
847 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
69%
847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
75%
847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
887 +
1414 Points (3%)
70%
847 +
min: 826     avg: 993     median: 992.5 (2%)     max: 1159 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
887 +
28 s (6%)
98%
847 +
35.5 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
887 +
64 s (3%)
99%
847 +
78.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
887 +
1343 s (6%)
98%
847 +
1780 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 847 +
15000 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 847 +
7310 MFLOPS (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 887 +
5.1 Points (65%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 887 +
3383 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 847 +
3149 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 847 +
2541 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 847 +
1742 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 847 +
1663 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 847 +
2014 Points (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 847 +
552 ms (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 847 → 78% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 02:01:02

#0 checking url part for id 3348 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2730 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 3348 +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 got single benchmarks 3348 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 2730 +0s ... 0.017s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#30 got single benchmarks 2730 +0.013s ... 0.03s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#77 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.046s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.071s

#79 return log +0.003s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)