Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 807 vs Intel Celeron 847

Intel Celeron 807

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 807 is a ULV single core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 350-950 MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to other Celerons, the 807 should be faster than a Celeron B720, thanks to Hyper-Threading support.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 807 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 847

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 847 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost are deactivated. The Celeron 847 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000.

The performance of the Pentium 847 should be faster than a similar clocked Arrandale Pentium CPU and therefore on a level of the 1.2 GHz Pentium U5400.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 847 is suited for small subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 807Intel Celeron 847
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8471.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 807 « 1.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B810 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 847 « 1.1 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 8071.5 GHz1 / 2 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Intel Celeron 797 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores1.5 MB L3
Clock1500 MHz1100 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB
L3 Cache1.5 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$70 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 807Intel Celeron 847

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 847 +
min: 0.57     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.72 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 847 +
min: 0.39     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.42 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 1094     avg: 1270     median: 1269.5 (10%)     max: 1445 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 2026     avg: 2408     median: 2407.5 (3%)     max: 2789 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 2865     avg: 3159     median: 3159 (2%)     max: 3453 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 847 +
min: 1564     avg: 1679     median: 1678.5 (9%)     max: 1793 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 847 +
2716 s (32%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 847 +
80.4 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 847 +
824 Points (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 847 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 847 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 847 +
min: 826     avg: 993     median: 992.5 (2%)     max: 1159 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 847 +
35.5 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 847 +
78.3 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 847 +
1780 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 847 +
15000 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 847 +
7310 MFLOPS (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 847 +
3149 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 847 +
2541 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 847 +
1742 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 847 +
1663 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 847 +
2014 Points (5%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 847 +
552 ms (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 847 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 27. 08:40:51

#0 checking url part for id 3364 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2730 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:57:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.015s ... 0.016s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.016s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3364 +0.002s ... 0.018s

#7 got single benchmarks 3364 +0s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2730 +0.002s ... 0.02s

#9 got single benchmarks 2730 +0.019s ... 0.039s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.054s ... 0.093s

#12 return log +0.022s ... 0.115s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)