Intel Celeron 887 vs Intel Celeron 807

Intel Celeron 887

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 887 is an Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor for entry-level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture but many of the features like Turbo Boost, AES, VT-d or HyperThreading are deactivated. The Celeron 887 integrates a graphics card called Intel HD Graphics that is based on the HD Graphics 2000 and clocked at 350 to 1000 MHz.

The performance of the Celeron 887 is similar to an identical clocked Pentium CPU like the Pentium 987.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 877 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 807

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 807 is a ULV single core processor for entry level laptops. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture (2nd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2000 at 350-950 MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to other Celerons, the 807 should be faster than a Celeron B720, thanks to Hyper-Threading support.

The integrated dual channel DDR3-1066/1333 memory controller supports up to 16GB.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller and therefore the 807 is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 807
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Sandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Series: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1700 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8871500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1300 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1800 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8071500 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1700 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1600 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1400 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B840 compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1700 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B810 compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 8871500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1300 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1800 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1100 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 8071500 MHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1700 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1600 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 797 compare1400 MHz1 / 11.5 MB
1500 MHz1500 MHz
128 KB64 KB
512 KB256 KB
2 MB1.5 MB
2 / 21 / 2
17 17
32 32
100 °C100 °C
BGA1023BGA1023
HD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)
$86 U.S.$70 U.S.
Intel Celeron 887Intel Celeron 807

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
887 +
1.1 Points (3%)
100%
807 +
1.1 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
887 +
0.6 Points (23%)
100%
807 +
0.6 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
887 +
1877 (19%)
100%
807 +
1877 (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
887 +
3597 (6%)
100%
807 +
3597 (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
887 +
4497 Points (5%)
100%
807 +
4497 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
887 +
2362 Points (21%)
100%
807 +
2362 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
887 +
1626 s (19%)
100%
807 +
1626 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
887 +
48 s (10%)
100%
807 +
48 s (10%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
887 +
986 (10%)
100%
807 +
986 (10%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
887 +
0 GB/s (0%)
100%
807 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
100%
807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
887 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
100%
807 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
887 +
1414 Points (9%)
100%
807 +
1414 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
887 +
28 s (6%)
100%
807 +
28 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
887 +
64 s (3%)
100%
807 +
64 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
887 +
1343 s (6%)
100%
807 +
1343 s (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
887 +
5.1 Points (65%)
100%
807 +
5.1 Points (65%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
887 +
3383 Points (5%)
100%
807 +
3383 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 887 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 807 → 100% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)