Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB vs Kingston SA2000M8500G
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
► remove from comparison
The Samsung 860 EVO 512GB is a fast SATA based 2.5-inch SSD. It is positioned below the 860 PRO and uses 3-bit MLC 3D NAND (TLC 64-layer) chips. As a controller Samsung uses its own MJX SSD controller. For more information on the Samsung 860 Evo see our review of the slightly faster 1 TB version.
Kingston SA2000M8500G
► remove from comparison
The Kingston A2000 (SA2000M8/500G) SSD is a mid range PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 SSD. It uses 3D-NAND TLC from Micron (96 Layer), the Silicon Motion SM2263ENG Controller and 1 GB DDR4L-1866 Cache.
| Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB | Kingston SA2000M8500G | |
| Type | SSD | SSD |
| Size | 2.5 | M.2 2280 |
| Capacity | 512 GB | 500 GB |
| Interface | SATA III | NVMe |
| Announced | 23.01.2018 | 14.10.2019 |
Benchmarks
Performance Rating - DiskSpd - 860 Evo 512GB
10 pt (11%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
...
FPT310M4SSD256G
Netac NS512GSSD330
Faspeed P8-512G-SE
Teclast BD256GB
FPT330M8SSD512G
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
Crucial P2 1TB CT1000P2SSD8
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
Foresee 512GB
Apple SSD SM0512F
Kingston OM8SEP4256Q-A0
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
Apple SSD AP0512
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
0%
100%
Performance Rating - DiskSpd - SA2000M8500G
23.4 pt (27%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
...
Lexar NM620 512GB
Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Kingston SA2000M8500G
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X113N
Lexar 1024GB LNM6A1X001T-HNNNG
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
0%
100%
325%
SA2000M8500G +1040 MB/s (17%)
126%
SA2000M8500G +357 MB/s (13%)
343%
SA2000M8500G +1714 MB/s (6%)
252%
SA2000M8500G +3013 Points (18%)
315%
SA2000M8500G +1486 Points (21%)
213%
SA2000M8500G +1001 Points (16%)
47%
SA2000M8500G +0.1 ms (0%)
155%
SA2000M8500G +0 ms (0%)
325%
SA2000M8500G +1092 MB/s (18%)
195%
SA2000M8500G +740 MB/s (15%)
233%
SA2000M8500G +203.7 MB/s (40%)
156%
SA2000M8500G +60.9 MB/s (19%)
385%
SA2000M8500G +1904 MB/s (17%)
383%
SA2000M8500G +2006 MB/s (16%)
258%
SA2000M8500G +231.2 MB/s (21%)
162%
SA2000M8500G +66.1 MB/s (2%)
375%
SA2000M8500G +1942 MB/s (10%)
323%
SA2000M8500G +1739 MB/s (21%)
163%
SA2000M8500G +495.3 MB/s (10%)
197%
SA2000M8500G +648 MB/s (9%)
388%
SA2000M8500G +2055 MB/s (14%)
398%
SA2000M8500G +2235 MB/s (12%)
224%
SA2000M8500G +223 MB/s (51%)
162%
SA2000M8500G +66 MB/s (19%)
307%
SA2000M8500G +1089 MB/s (17%)
204%
SA2000M8500G +813 MB/s (10%)
358%
SA2000M8500G +1810 MB/s (18%)
262%
SA2000M8500G +1392 MB/s (18%)
356%
SA2000M8500G +1873 MB/s (13%)
303%
SA2000M8500G +1699 MB/s (11%)
297%
SA2000M8500G +1656 MB/s (10%)
Average Benchmarks Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB → 100% n=31
Average Benchmarks Kingston SA2000M8500G → 264% n=31
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.34