Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB vs Kingston SA2000M8500G

Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB

► remove from comparison  860 Evo 512GB

The Samsung 860 EVO 512GB is a fast SATA based 2.5-inch SSD. It is positioned below the 860 PRO and uses 3-bit MLC 3D NAND (TLC 64-layer) chips. As a controller Samsung uses its own MJX SSD controller. For more information on the Samsung 860 Evo see our review of the slightly faster 1 TB version.

Kingston SA2000M8500G

► remove from comparison  SA2000M8500G

The Kingston A2000 (SA2000M8/500G) SSD is a mid range PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 SSD. It uses 3D-NAND TLC from Micron (96 Layer), the Silicon Motion SM2263ENG Controller and 1 GB DDR4L-1866 Cache.

Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GBKingston SA2000M8500G
TypeSSDSSD
Size2.5M.2 2280
Capacity512 GB500 GB
InterfaceSATA IIINVMe
Announced23.01.2018 14.10.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd - 860 Evo 512GB
10 pt (11%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.719 -93%
...
FPT310M4SSD256G
8.2 -18%
Netac NS512GSSD330
8.46 -15%
8.48 -15%
8.49 -15%
Faspeed P8-512G-SE
8.68 -13%
Teclast BD256GB
8.69 -13%
FPT330M8SSD512G
9.05 -9%
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
9.63 -4%
9.84 -2%
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
10
Crucial P2 1TB CT1000P2SSD8
10.3 3%
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
10.5 5%
10.7 7%
Foresee 512GB
11.3 13%
Apple SSD SM0512F
11.3 13%
Kingston OM8SEP4256Q-A0
11.4 14%
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
11.6 16%
Apple SSD AP0512
11.6 16%
11.8 18%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
88.1 781%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - DiskSpd - SA2000M8500G
23.4 pt (27%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.719 -97%
...
Lexar NM620 512GB
23.1 -1%
23.2 -1%
23.2 -1%
23.2 -1%
23.3 0%
Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB
23.3 0%
23.3 0%
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0
23.3 0%
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
23.4 0%
Kingston SA2000M8500G
23.4
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
23.6 1%
23.6 1%
23.6 1%
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
23.6 1%
23.6 1%
23.8 2%
SK hynix HFS512GEJ4X113N
23.9 2%
Lexar 1024GB LNM6A1X001T-HNNNG
23.9 2%
24 3%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
88.1 276%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
319.6 MB/s (5%)
1040 MB/s (17%)
AS SSD - Copy Program
283.8 MB/s (11%)
357 MB/s (13%)
AS SSD - Copy ISO
500 MB/s (2%)
1714 MB/s (6%)
AS SSD - Score Total
1198 Points (7%)
3013 Points (18%)
AS SSD - Score Write
472 Points (7%)
1486 Points (21%)
AS SSD - Score Read
471 Points (8%)
1001 Points (16%)
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
0 ms (0%)
0.1 ms (0%)
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
0.1 ms (0%)
0 ms (0%)
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
335.7 MB/s (6%)
1092 MB/s (18%)
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
380 MB/s (7%)
740 MB/s (15%)
AS SSD - 4K Write
87.3 MB/s (17%)
203.7 MB/s (40%)
AS SSD - 4K Read
38.9 MB/s (12%)
60.9 MB/s (19%)
AS SSD - Sequential Write
495 MB/s (4%)
1904 MB/s (17%)
AS SSD - Sequential Read
524 MB/s (4%)
2006 MB/s (16%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
89.6 MB/s (8%)
231.2 MB/s (21%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
40.9 MB/s (1%)
66.1 MB/s (2%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
518 MB/s (3%)
1942 MB/s (10%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
539 MB/s (6%)
1739 MB/s (21%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
304 MB/s (6%)
495.3 MB/s (10%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
329 MB/s (5%)
648 MB/s (9%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
529 MB/s (4%)
2055 MB/s (14%)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
561 MB/s (3%)
2235 MB/s (12%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
99.7 MB/s (23%)
223 MB/s (51%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
40.8 MB/s (12%)
66 MB/s (19%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
354.4 MB/s (6%)
1089 MB/s (17%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
397.7 MB/s (5%)
813 MB/s (10%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
505 MB/s (5%)
1810 MB/s (18%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
532 MB/s (7%)
1392 MB/s (18%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
526 MB/s (4%)
1873 MB/s (13%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
560 MB/s (3%)
1699 MB/s (11%)
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
558 MB/s (3%)
1656 MB/s (10%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks Kingston SA2000M8500G → 264% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 24. 15:30:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3534 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3771 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761312624s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 Oct 2025 20:01:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3534 +0.006s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 3534 +0.002s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3771 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 3771 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.102s ... 0.117s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.117s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > HDD/SSD Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)