Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-450M vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

Intel Core i5-450M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-450M is a dual-core laptop CPU and clocks (due to Turbo Boost) with max. 2.4 - 2.66 GHz. Both cores are based on the Nehalem (Westmere) micro-architecture and due to Hyperthreading the processor is able to work with 4 threads simultaneously. The performance of the i5 is in the mid-range. The i5-450M is similar to the Core i5-520M, but the 450M does not offer AES functions.

A feature of the new Core i5-450M is the integrated graphics card called GMA HD and memory controller. Both are on a separate die that is still manufactured in 45nm whereas the CPU die is already manufactured in the new 32nm process.

The performance of the i5 450M is on average faster than a Core 2 Duo T9500 and due to the Turbo Boost, single threaded applications run even better. Therefore, the Core i5-520M is as fast as high clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs and should handle most gaming and multimedia tasks well.

The integrated Intel Graphics Media Accelerator HD (GMA HD) graphics card is known to be clocked up to 500-766 MHz and should be clearly faster than the old GMA 4500MHD. A GeForce 9400M (ION) should still be a faster (especially as Nvidia and ATI cards have a better driver support than Intel up to now). According to rumors, the GMA core will also use the Turbo Mode regulate the clock speed.

The power consumption of 35 Watt TDP (max.) counts for the whole package and therefore it is clearly better than the 35 Watt TDP of the Core 2 Duo T-series (CPU alone). Due to the Turbo Boost, the Core i5 more likely uses the TDP under load than the older Core 2 Duo CPUs. Without any load, the i5 uses noticable less power.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.

ModelIntel Core i5-450MIntel Core 2 Duo SP9300
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core 2 Duo
CodenameArrandalePenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i5-580M compare2.67 - 3.33 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560M compare2.67 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-480M compare2.67 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540M compare2.53 - 3.07 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-460M compare2.53 - 2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520M compare2.4 - 2.93 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-450M « 2.4 - 2.66 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430M compare2.26 - 2.53 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-560UM compare1.33 - 2.13 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-470UM compare1.33 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-540UM compare1.2 - 2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-520UM compare1.06 - 1.87 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-430UM compare1.2 - 1.73 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 « 2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2400 - 2660 MHz2260 MHz
FSB25001066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB6 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million410 Million
32 nm45 nm, 1.05-1.15V
Die Size81+114 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA988BGA956
FeaturesHD Graphics (500-766MHz), DDR3-800/1066 Memory Controller (max. 8 GB), Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Virtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, MMX, SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2)Virtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$284 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 450M +
min: 1.71     avg: 2.1     median: 2.2 (3%)     max: 2.19 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
450M +
min: 2512     avg: 2882     median: 2922.5 (18%)     max: 3020 Points
min: 2508     avg: 2522     median: 2517 (15%)     max: 2541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
450M +
min: 5580     avg: 6650     median: 6778.5 (5%)     max: 6945 Points
min: 4753     avg: 4759     median: 4757 (3%)     max: 4767 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 450M +
min: 7440     avg: 8070     median: 8094 (6%)     max: 8329 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 450M +
min: 3012     avg: 3549     median: 3628 (4%)     max: 3690 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
450M +
min: 589     avg: 901     median: 634 (7%)     max: 1933 s
min: 1146     avg: 1642     median: 1641.5 (19%)     max: 2137 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
450M +
min: 18.85     avg: 28.5     median: 20 (4%)     max: 59.2 s
min: 35.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (11%)     max: 69.4 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
450M +
min: 2571     avg: 2769     median: 2795 (6%)     max: 2840 Points
min: 1941     avg: 1996     median: 1974 (4%)     max: 2074 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
450M +
min: 16     avg: 16.6     median: 16.4 (4%)     max: 18 s
min: 20.03     avg: 21     median: 21 (5%)     max: 22 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
450M +
min: 38     avg: 39.6     median: 39.4 (2%)     max: 41.3 s
min: 47.24     avg: 47.6     median: 47.6 (2%)     max: 48 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
450M +
min: 877     avg: 917     median: 913.5 (4%)     max: 984 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
450M +
min: 30620     avg: 32730     median: 31630 (15%)     max: 37850 MIPS
19380 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
450M +
min: 27000     avg: 29144     median: 27680 (21%)     max: 35580 MFLOPS
16680 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
450M +
6346 Points (13%)
min: 4425     avg: 4480     median: 4480 (9%)     max: 4535 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
450M +
min: 6.5     avg: 6.8     median: 6.8 (87%)     max: 6.8 Points
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 450M +
min: 7076     avg: 7489     median: 7585 (7%)     max: 7637 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 450M +
2222 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-450M → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 82% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 02. 08:42:54

#0 checking url part for id 964 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:34:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 964 +0.003s ... 0.03s

#7 got single benchmarks 964 +0.086s ... 0.116s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0.003s ... 0.119s

#9 got single benchmarks 421 +0.016s ... 0.135s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.113s ... 0.248s

#12 return log +0.04s ... 0.288s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)