, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core i3-4010U vs Intel Core i3-4005U

Intel Core i3-4010U

► remove from comparison Intel 4010U

The Intel Core i3-4010U is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor for ultrabooks launched in Q2 2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and is manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyper-Treading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel, leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 1.7 GHz and includes no Turbo Boost support.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving the performance per clock by almost 10 percent. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

The performance of the Core i3-4010U is slightly above the old and slightly higher clocked Core i3-3217U. However, when using new instruction sets such as AVX2 the performance can be significantly better. Thus, the CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as most applications.

The integrated HD Graphics 4400 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 1000 MHz with Turbo Boost, making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics 4000 at similar clock speeds. However, the HD 4400 is a bit slower than the HD 5000 found on a number of other ULV models.

The Core i3-4010U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including the graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset. Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

Intel Core i3-4005U

► remove from comparison Intel 4005U

The Intel Core i3-4005U is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core processor for ultrabooks which has been presented in Q3/2013. It is based on the Haswell architecture and manufactured in 22nm. Due to Hyperthreading, the two cores can handle up to four threads in parallel, leading to better utilization of the CPU. Each core offers a base speed of 1.7 GHz (no Turbo Boost support). Compared to the Core i3-4010U, the 4005U offers a slightly lower GPU clock, less I/O-ports and lacks support for VT-d.

Haswell is the successor to the Ivy Bridge architecture with improvements on both GPU and CPU performance. The CPUs are produced in 22nm and offer an optimized branch prediction as well as additional execution ports, improving the performance per clock by almost 10 percent. Furthermore, new features like AVX2 and FMA should increase the performance in future applications.

The performance of the Core i3-4005U is slightly above the old and slightly higher clocked Core i3-3217U. However, when using new instructions such as AVX2 the performance can be significantly better. Thus, the CPU has sufficient power for office and multimedia purposes as well as most applications.

The integrated HD Graphics 4400 offers 20 Execution Units (EUs) clocked at 200 - 950 MHz (with Turbo Boost), making it somewhat faster than the former HD Graphics 4000 (at similar clocks). However, the HD 4400 is significantly slower than the HD 5000 of other ULV models.

The Core i3-4005U is rated at a TDP of 15 W including graphics card, memory controller, VRMs and the integrated chipset.  Therefore, the CPU is suited for small ultrabooks 11-inches or greater.

Intel Core i3-4010UIntel Core i3-4005U
Intel Core i3Intel Core i3
HaswellHaswell
Series: Core i3 Haswell
Intel Core i3-4110M compare2.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4000M compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-4010U1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4005U1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4020Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4110M compare2.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100M compare2.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4000M compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100E compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4158U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4120U compare2 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4025U compare1.9 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4100U compare1.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010U1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Core i3-4005U1.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4102E compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4030Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4020Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4012Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-4010Y compare1.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
1700 MHz1700 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
3 MB3 MB
2 / 42 / 4
15 15
22 22
100 °C100 °C
FCBGA1168
HD Graphics 4400 (200 - 1000 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIHD Graphics 4400 (200 - 950 MHz), DDR3(L)-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4400 (200 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 4400 (200 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$281 U.S.
Intel Core i3 4010UIntel Core i3 4005U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 170     median: 170.5 (2%)     max: 173 Points
min: 171     avg: 172     median: 172 (2%)     max: 172 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 59     avg: 65.5     median: 67 (25%)     max: 68 Points
min: 39     avg: 58.7     median: 68 (25%)     max: 69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.76     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (3%)     max: 1.87 Points
min: 1.84     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (3%)     max: 1.87 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.69     avg: 0.7     median: 0.8 (24%)     max: 0.77 Points
min: 0.75     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (24%)     max: 0.76 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2345     avg: 2461     median: 2469 (22%)     max: 2548
min: 2513     avg: 2518     median: 2514 (22%)     max: 2528
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5194     avg: 5536     median: 5584 (9%)     max: 5786
min: 5685     avg: 5707     median: 5706 (9%)     max: 5730
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 5629     avg: 6930     median: 7328 (7%)     max: 7434 Points
min: 7392     avg: 7435     median: 7445 (7%)     max: 7469 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 2529     avg: 3137     median: 3328 (24%)     max: 3361 Points
min: 3295     avg: 3311     median: 3310 (23%)     max: 3327 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1000 s (12%)
min: 889.452     avg: 922     median: 921.8 (11%)     max: 954.225 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
32.6 s (7%)
min: 27.954     avg: 29.2     median: 29.2 (6%)     max: 30.437 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 4005U +
1853 (12%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 4005U +
min: 10.88     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (5%)     max: 11 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 4005U +
min: 57.27     avg: 57.6     median: 57.6 (17%)     max: 58 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 4005U +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 4005U +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 4005U +
1 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2266     avg: 2280     median: 2279.5 (13%)     max: 2293 Points
2211 Points (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22 s (5%)
min: 21.856     avg: 21.9     median: 21.9 (5%)     max: 21.887 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
48.7 s (2%)
min: 48.64     avg: 49.2     median: 49.2 (2%)     max: 49.748 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1081 s (5%)
min: 1085     avg: 1087     median: 1086.9 (5%)     max: 1088.74 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 4010U +
26370 MIPS (13%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 4010U +
18150 MFLOPS (14%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6012     avg: 6082     median: 6081.5 (7%)     max: 6151 Points
6042 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2129     avg: 2371     median: 2340 (9%)     max: 2569 Points
min: 1944     avg: 2327     median: 2507 (9%)     max: 2530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 16754     avg: 19782     median: 20042.5 (13%)     max: 21204 Points
min: 19183     avg: 19503     median: 19209 (12%)     max: 20117 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 4005U +
18619 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 4005U +
21641 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1647     avg: 1758     median: 1773 (4%)     max: 1804 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1691     median: 1672 (4%)     max: 1766 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2175     avg: 2411     median: 2448 (6%)     max: 2484 Points
min: 2291     avg: 2362     median: 2362 (6%)     max: 2433 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3421     avg: 3534     median: 3534 (6%)     max: 3647
3441 (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1693     avg: 1730     median: 1730 (36%)     max: 1767
1673 (34%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4061     avg: 4113     median: 4112.7 (7%)     max: 4164.3 ms
3960 ms (7%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 192.8     avg: 198     median: 198.2 (2%)     max: 203.6 ms
min: 182.1     avg: 191     median: 190.6 (2%)     max: 199 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 7213     avg: 7443     median: 7442.5 (11%)     max: 7672 Points
8010 Points (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-4010U → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-4005U → 100% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 28. 09:00:37

#0 checking url part for id 4222 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4570 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4222 +0s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 4222 +0.017s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4570 +0s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 4570 +0.013s ... 0.042s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.063s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.066s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)