Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G review - Improved foldable smartphone shatters dreams of foldables

Samsung's foldable lacks courage and competitors. With more robustness, Galaxy Z Fold in its fourth generation aims to be more suitable for everyday operation. While the Fold 4 is a solid upgrade with its brighter dynamic AMOLED panel, the camera of the Galaxy S22+, and the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1, it remains behind expectations.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review

On paper, the fourth generation of the Galaxy Z Fold is a gentle update of the Galaxy Z Fold3, and there were no changes in the basic concept of the foldable series. In addition to the new 50-MP main camera from the Galaxy S22 Plus, perhaps the largest change is inside the foldable smartphone. Now this contains the relatively efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which is supposed to also improve the battery life of the Z Fold4, since the battery capacity remains unchanged at 4,400 mAh.

In terms of the display, there are also only small adjustments in the large foldable smartphone. The main screen continues to measure 7.6 inch, but it now has a 21.6:18 format, making the case slightly wider in unfolded state. The reason for this is the 6.2-inch front display, which now offers a slightly more user-friendly format at 23.1:9, appearing less tall than the Fold3 before it. 

This review will clarify how the Galaxy Z Fold4 fares in everyday operation and whether an upgrade from the predecessor is worthwhile.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Galaxy Z Fold Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
7.60 inch 12:10, 2176 x 1812 pixel 373 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, dynamic AMOLED, Cover display: 6.2 inch; 2316x904; 23.1:9; Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, hall sensor, OTG, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.3 x 155.1 x 130.1 ( = 0.25 x 6.11 x 5.12 in)
Battery
4400 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, 23mm, 1.0µm) + 10 MP (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, OIS, 66mm, 1.0µm) + 12MP (f/2.2, 12mm, 1.12µm, wide angle lens), camera2API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2) + 4 MP (f/1.8, 26mm, 2.0µm, UDC)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB cable, info material, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR value: 1.301W/​kg head, 1.506W/​kg body, fanless, waterproof
Weight
263 g ( = 9.28 oz / 0.58 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
1799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.8 %
10/2022
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
263 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2176x1812
88.9 %
09/2021
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
271 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.60"2208x1768
84.3 %
02/2022
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
284 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.30"2688x1892
86.9 %
08/2022
Vivo X Fold
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
311 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.03"2160x1916
89.4 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
88.8 %
09/2022
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
225 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
84.1 %
09/2022
Huawei Mate Xs 2
SD 888 4G, Adreno 660
255 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash7.80"2480x2220

Case - Samsung smartphone with UDC

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is available in three color options: Gray Green, Beige, and Phantom Black
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is available in three color options: Gray Green, Beige, and Phantom Black
There is also a red Burgundy version available exclusively in the Samsung online shop.
There is also a red Burgundy version available exclusively in the Samsung online shop.
UD camera of the Galaxy Z Fold4
UD camera of the Galaxy Z Fold4

At first glance, the Z Fold4 looks hardly any different than its predecessor. However, the newly designed hinge of the foldable smartphone reduces the weight minimally to 263 grams (~9.28 oz), and it also allows Samsung to keep the IPX8-certified case slightly slimmer. But at almost 16 mm (~0.63 in), the Fold4 is still significantly thicker than a Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 at 11 mm (~0.43 in). There is also still no integrated S Pen slot as in the Galaxy S22 Ultra

The workmanship and haptics of the Fold4 are at a very high level. Compared to the Fold3, the slightly edgy transition between the hinge and glass elements was improved, but it is still noticeable in the current generation of the foldable. Unfolding the Fold4 is very easy and feels very high-quality. In the Flex mode, you can adjust it to any variable angle between 75 and 115 degrees. 

While users still shouldn't mistreat the inner display of the foldable with pointy objects such as keys, with the fourth generation of the Fold series, Samsung promises more robustness. While it still has the Armor aluminum frame known from the predecessor and the Gorilla Glas Victus+ in the front and back, the flexible dynamic AMOLED panel is now also covered by a newly developed ultra-thin glass layer, which according to the manufacturer is supposed to be up to 45% more robust. With its new mosaic pattern, the under-display camera (UDC) of the Fold4 looks less annoying than that of the predecessor, but it is still visible. Looking at the center of the screen, it is well integrated into the image display, but when you look at it closely, the area with the thinner subpixels is easily noticeable, particularly with a white background. While this solution is more discrete compared to a punch hole, an even thicker pixel grid above the camera would have been better for the OLED panel. 

Compared to the Fold3, the bezels around the display have become slightly slimmer. The display-to-surface ratio of the large 7.6-inch panel is a very efficient 90.9%. The Z Fold3 "only" reached 88.9% here, which was still very good.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review

Size Comparison

184.5 mm / 7.26 inch 145.2 mm / 5.72 inch 5.5 mm / 0.2165 inch 284 g0.626 lbs162 mm / 6.38 inch 142 mm / 5.59 inch 14.6 mm / 0.575 inch 311 g0.686 lbs163.2 mm / 6.43 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 225 g0.496 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 77.9 mm / 3.07 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 228 g0.503 lbs158.2 mm / 6.23 inch 128.1 mm / 5.04 inch 6.4 mm / 0.252 inch 271 g0.597 lbs155.1 mm / 6.11 inch 130.1 mm / 5.12 inch 6.3 mm / 0.248 inch 263 g0.58 lbs210 mm / 8.27 inch 148 mm / 5.83 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Equipment - Galaxy Z Fold4 with UWB

You can purchase the Galaxy Z Fold4 with either 256 GB or 512 GB of UFS 3.1 storage and 12 GB of DDR5-RAM. You can also get a 1-TB version exclusively from Samsung's online shop. The equipment of the foldable smartphone is very extensive, but you can also expect this for an MSRP of 1,799 Euros (~$1765). 

Included are an always-on function, Miracast, the Ultra-Wideband Technology (UWB), NFC, and with USB 3.2 (Gen1), also a fast standard with a high data transfer rates and the option for wired display output (UHD at 60 fps via DisplayPort) to HDMI and DisplayPort-capable devices. USB-OTG for a quick connection of external accessories is also supported by the Fold4. 

Unfortunately, the Samsung foldable lacks classic equipment features such as a status LED, the option to expand the storage via microSD cards, or a 3.5-mm audio port. 

Left case side (hinge)
Left case side (hinge)
Right case side (volume rocker, on/off key, SIM slot)
Right case side (volume rocker, on/off key, SIM slot)
Bottom of the case (microphone, USB port, speaker)
Bottom of the case (microphone, USB port, speaker)
Top of the case (speaker, microphone)
Top of the case (speaker, microphone)

Software - Samsung Smartphone with Android 12L

With Android 12L, the Galaxy Z Fold4 uses a version of the Linux Kernel based operating system that is optimized for large displays. In the best case, the 2022 foldable smartphone from Samsung will still get Android 16, since the Galaxy Z family will get up to four generations of OS upgrades and security updates for five years. At the level of July 2022, the latter are not very current anymore at the time of this test. Samsung also protects its foldable with the Knox Vault platform, consisting of a secure processor unit that isolates sensible data such as passwords and biometric information from the main operating system.

As customary, Samsung combines the Android operating system with its in-house OneUI user interface version 4.1.1, which now offers a task bar known from Windows 11. In addition, there are new swipe gestures to split the display into two windows or change full-screen apps into adjustable popups. But despite the new task bar, Samsung DeX with the desktop-like user interface continues to be available. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review

Communication and GNSS - Galaxy phone with 5G

Although the foldable smartphone from Samsung supports the Wi-Fi 6E WLAN standard, it is only able to communicate with the 2.4 and 5.0 GHz bands of our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router. On the other hand, the transfer rates of about 900 Mbit/s are very stable. Yet much higher speeds should (theoretically) be possible in the 6-GHz frequency band. 

For mobile connections, the Samsung smartphone supports all the current mobile communication standards, including 5G. Like its predecessor before, the Galaxy Z Fold4 doesn't support the mmWave in Germany, which should allow data rates of up to 70 Gbit/s in theory. However, the slightly slower 5G-Sub6 is still significantly faster at up to 5 Gbit/s than using the 4G frequencies. The foldable also supports a wide selection here, and all the necessary LTE bands in the German-language countries are supported.   

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1032 (449min - 1423max) MBit/s +17%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
948 (929min - 953max) MBit/s +7%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
923 (715min - 949max) MBit/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
882 (836min - 927max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (539min - 791max) MBit/s -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=209, last 2 years)
655 MBit/s -26%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
653 (585min - 686max) MBit/s -26%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1176 (380min - 1712max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
941 (880min - 952max) MBit/s +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
913 (455min - 948max) MBit/s
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
887 (845min - 940max) MBit/s -3%
Huawei Mate Xs 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 4G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844 (415min - 880max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=210, last 2 years)
692 MBit/s -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
521 (311min - 704max) MBit/s -43%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1368 (671min - 1409max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
893 (428min - 917max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (852-1767)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1642-1735)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (836-927)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (539-791)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (455-948)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø510 (311-704)
Locating indoors
Locating indoors
Locating outdoors
Locating outdoors

The wide range of GNSS support of the foldable smartphone allows the satfix to succeed very quickly even indoors. The location is determined via GPS (L1, L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1, B2), and Galileo (E1, E5), as well as SBAS. In order to evaluate the locating capabilities in practice, we record a route for comparison with the Garmin Venu 2. 

The deviations in our recorded route are small. The detailed route of the GPS recording shows only smaller inaccuracies of the Fold4, but those shouldn't stand in the way of even exact navigation tasks.   

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 vs. Garmin Venu 2
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 vs. Garmin Venu 2

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - Galaxy Z Fold4 with dual-SIM support

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review

Thanks to its dual-SIM functionality, the Galaxy Z Fold4 supports two Nano SIM cards, as well as VoLTE and WLAN calling. Instead of the SIM cards, you can also use one or two eSIMs simultaneously.

In quiet surroundings, the voice quality is very attractive, and the speaker mode also allows clearly understandable communication with your conversation partner during video calls. Even though the voices of the conversation partners sound fairly natural using the speaker, the Fold4 is very quiet in loud surroundings. 

Cameras - Samsung smartphone with triple cam system

Selfie with the 4-MP cam
Selfie with the 4-MP cam
Selfie with the 10-MP cam
Selfie with the 10-MP cam

Friends of selfies can even have three times the fun with the Galaxy Z Fold4 – at least in theory. Underneath the main display, Samsung has hidden an under-display camera with 4 MP, which allows taking solid pictures, but the results still aren't very good. The results are better with the 10-MP punch-hole lens of the exterior display. In good light conditions, it succeeds in taking contrast-rich selfies with a decent illumination. However, those who want to get the best results will want to use the main camera in the unfolded state, looking at the front panel as the view finder. 

The new 50-MP main camera is based on the ISOCELL GN5 sensor from the Samsung Galaxy S22 (Plus). The 1/1.57-inch Samsung sensor impresses with attractive colors and a solid sharpness in daylight conditions. However, particularly the dynamic and richness in details don't range at the flagship level. We also aren't very impressed by the sensor sensitivity under bad light conditions. In this regard, there has to be a larger improvement with the next smartphone generation.    

In addition, the triple camera system includes a new 10-MP camera with OIS and lossless 3x zoom and a 12-MP lens for ultrawide angle recordings. The latter should be identical to that in the Fold3, which is unfortunate, since we would have liked a better ultrawide angle sensor here as well, considering the price level. The tele lens with its nominally low resolution takes decent pictures, but the edges appear blurry, offering only few details already at a 5x hybrid zoom. 

You can record videos in 8K resolution at 24 fps or in 4K at 60 fps. You can also switch between the lenses while recording a video. The color temperatures of the main, wide angle, and tele camera are well-adjusted to each other.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 smartphone review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleLow lightUltrawide angle5x zoom
Ultrawide angle
Wide angle
3x zoom
10x zoom
30x zoom (max)
50-MP mode

Samsung doesn't cooperate with a traditional camera manufacturer for camera calibration, unlike other smartphone manufacturers. However, the colors are still reproduced well, without objects looking too pale. The color accuracy we measure under controlled light conditions only shows two outliers (>15). The analysis with the ColorChecker Passport compared to the actual reference colors shows some room for improvement particularly in green and brown color tones, as well as the grayscale. 

ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G: 9.33 ∆E min: 3.1 - max: 21.4 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.2 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G: 14.5 ∆E min: 6.21 - max: 23.42 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Samsung smartphone without a charger

Optional accessories of the Galaxy Z Fold4
Optional accessories of the Galaxy Z Fold4

The box of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 doesn't include a charger, but there is a data or charging cable (USB-C to USB-C) and a SIM tool. Optionally, Samsung also offers the S Pen Fold Edition and a standing cover together with the S Pen, as well as the S Pen Pro.

Samsung offers a warranty of 24 months for its smartphone. When you purchase the foldable, Samsung Care+ is again included for a year, so it is limited to damages occurring within this period. Some specific accidental damage such as broken displays and damage from liquids is covered. According to the warranty conditions, there is a deductible of 130 Euros (~$128) in the case of accidental damage. 

Input Devices and Operation - Galaxy smartphone with FaceUnlock

The S Pen is not included with the Galaxy Fold4
The S Pen is not included with the Galaxy Fold4

The exterior display, which is protected by Corning Gorilla Glas Victus+, is very responsive and relatively safe from scratches. The new format ratio makes typing slightly more comfortable but is still no game changer in terms of operation or when typing longer texts. One advantage of the Fold series from the Korean manufacturer compared to the competitors is the Flex mode, which is again very stable and functional. The Flex mode allows you for example to record video calls or take pictures with a long exposure without having to use a tripod, by placing one side of the Fold4 on a flat surface, while recording with the camera in the other side. 

The main display inside the Fold4 is covered by an ultrathin, foldable glass layer, which is covered by a permanent protective foil. Even though this doesn't feel as hard as glass, it still doesn't appear cheap and should also last for a longer time of usage without showing any signs of wearing out. For more than 12 months, a Galaxy Z Fold3 has been running through an endurance test in our lab without the foil becoming loose or discolored. Despite S Pen usage, there are also no deep scratches. 

Thanks to the refresh rate of 120 Hz, changing images or scrolling websites are displayed very smoothly. However, before purchasing a Fold4, any potential buyer should be aware that the 7.6-inch display with its unusual side ratio is less suited for social media apps. Also, mobile pages in the browser often appear with a strange sizing. Productive work in split screen mode also takes some time of getting used to, since the almost square screen area will be split into two very tall work areas. 

The fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button unlocks the Samsung smartphone very reliably and quickly. The FaceUnlock function via the front camera, which is based on very simple 2D face recognition, is similarly reliable in everyday operation, although it is not as safe. The UDC can also be used for this kind of unlocking.

The Fold4 supports two devices for pen input: the S Pen Pro and the S Pen Fold Edition. Unfortunately, the support continues to be limited to only the main display, so that practical functions such as writing a quick note in stand-by operation with the Galaxy S22 Ultra are not supported here. Except for the gestures and remote control functions, all the usual features are available, and the S Pen ensures an accurate input on the responsive OLED display. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
 

Display - Galaxy Z Fold4 with AMOLED

Subpixel grid of the outside panel
Subpixel grid of the outside panel
Display seam of the Galaxy Z Fold4
Display seam of the Galaxy Z Fold4

The main reason to decide for purchasing a Galaxy Z Fold4 would probably be the large, 7.6-inch dynamic AMOLED display with a dynamic refresh rate of 1 to 120 Hz. However, the main display uses a minimum refresh rate of 24 Hz during our testing period. The "DRM Info" app reports a range between 10 and 120 Hz. The resolution of 2,176 x 1,812 pixels results in a fairly square 21.6:18 format. Compared to the predecessor, the maximum brightness has again slightly increased. 

With a full white image display, we measure a maximum brightness of 950 cd/m². In the APL18 measurement with light and dark image areas, it is 1,226 cd/m² in the center of the screen. This makes the HDR10+ panel very well suited for the reproduction of contents with a large dynamic range. Although a Galaxy S22 Ultra can reach an even higher brightness of almost 1,800 cd/m², the Fold4 still performs at the flagship level of other manufacturers here.  

The seam in the folding area is still easily noticeable, but only if you look at the panel from a side angle. We do not notice any visible advantage compared to the predecessor in this regard. 

Outside Display

The front panel measures 6.2 inches in the diagonal. With a refresh rate of 48 to 120 Hz, it is slightly less dynamic than the main display. The 2,316 x 904 pixels result in a tall, stretched 23.1:9 format and a slightly higher sharpness level at 402 ppi. In terms of brightness, the two dynamic AMOLED displays perform at a similar level. At 1,430 cd/m², the small exterior panel gets slightly brighter in the APL18 measurement, but we measure an almost identical maximum brightness of 944 cd/m² with a full white display. 

Pulse-width Modulation

Due to the OLED technology, both panels of the foldable are not free of display flickering. We measure a low PWM frequency of 120 Hz at minimum brightness. When the brightness of both displays is increased, the flickering levels out at a constant 240 Hz. For sensitive users, such low frequencies can become problematic, even though the constant flickering works similarly as DC Dimming. In our Temporal Dithering test, the Fold4 doesn't show any conspicuous behavior. In this test, we look at the display with a microscope playing a 240-fps slow motion video at full brightness with a gray background. 

1) 7.6" (X-Rite i1Pro 3) 2) 6.2" (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
950
cd/m²
934
cd/m²
932
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
930
cd/m²
927
cd/m²
944
cd/m²
934
cd/m²
929
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with 7.6" (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Maximum: 950 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 936.2 cd/m² Minimum: 0.97 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 930 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.08
928
cd/m²
917
cd/m²
944
cd/m²
926
cd/m²
913
cd/m²
947
cd/m²
923
cd/m²
925
cd/m²
942
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with 6.2" (X-Rite i1Pro 3)
Maximum: 947 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 929.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 913 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2176x1812, 7.60
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 2208x1768, 7.60
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
AMOLED, 2688x1892, 8.30
Vivo X Fold
AMOLED, 2160x1916, 8.03
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Huawei Mate Xs 2
OLED, 2480x2220, 7.80
Screen
-30%
-48%
-5%
21%
1%
-58%
Brightness middle
913
808
-12%
663
-27%
730
-20%
1077
18%
831
-9%
763
-16%
Brightness
929
820
-12%
661
-29%
724
-22%
1093
18%
807
-13%
769
-17%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
98
2%
95
-1%
97
1%
91
-5%
95
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.7
2.9
-71%
3.5
-106%
1.66
2%
1.2
29%
1.03
39%
2.8
-65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.6
4.2
-17%
5.3
-47%
2.92
19%
2
44%
3.06
15%
5.9
-64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
2.5
-67%
2.7
-80%
1.6
-7%
1.3
13%
1.8
-20%
4.3
-187%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.01 109%
1.93 114%
2.28 96%
2.37 93%
2.233 99%
2.24 98%
CCT
6515 100%
6359 102%
6503 100%
6395 102%
6526 100%
6396 102%
6457 101%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
maximum manual display brightness (without Boost)
100%

Series of measurements at fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The OneUI interface still doesn't offer a lot of adjustment options in terms of the color reproduction. The Fold4 offers two different profiles, but you can only adjust the color temperature in the "Vivid" profile. You cannot adjust separate display parameters such as the saturation according to your own preference.  

In our tests with the CalMAN software and a spectral photometer, the 7.6-inch AMOLED panel shows itself as very well calibrated with very low color deviations (in the "Natural" color profile), even if you can still see minimal deviations. The Galaxy foldable still ends up within the target range of <3. Due to the OLED technology where single pixels can be turned off completely, the contrast is very good.

The smaller exterior panel also targets the smaller sRGB color space but is slightly better calibrated with DeltaE deviations <2. However, these differences aren't really noticeable in everyday operation. 

7.6-inch screen color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
7.6-inch screen color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
7.6-inch screen color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
7.6-inch screen color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
7.6-inch screen grayscale (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
7.6-inch screen grayscale (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
7.6-inch screen saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
7.6-inch screen saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen color accuracy (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen color space (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen grayscale (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen grayscale (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)
6.2-inch screen saturation (target color space: sRGB; profile: Natural)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.76 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.94 ms rise
↘ 0.817 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5265 ms rise
↘ 0.53 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

With its high brightness, the foldable smartphone from Samsung is very well suited for everyday usage outdoors. However, those who don't use the automatic brightness sensor will only get a brightness of about 420 cd/m² (~720 cd/m² with the "Additional brightness" option) from the panels. In direct sunlight with the corresponding reflections on the surface, the image contents are still readable due to the high contrasts, even if buyers of the Fold4 cannot expect a brightness reserve such as that of a Galaxy S22 Ultra. The protective foil on the main display is slightly more reflective than the Gorilla Glass Victus+ of the exterior panel. 

The viewing angle stability of the two AMOLED panels is very good, and you only notice a slight loss in brightness from very steep viewing angles. The colors will still look vibrant and hardly distorted. 

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 smartphone review

Performance - Samsung smartphone with Qualcomm SoC

Graphic tests (GFX Bench) slightly higher with the exterior panel
Graphic tests (GFX Bench) slightly higher with the exterior panel

In contrast to the Galaxy S22 Ultra, buyers of the foldable also get a Qualcomm chipset in Europe. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 is supported by 12 GB of LPDDR5 working memory and also contains an Adreno 730

In our CPU benchmarks, the Galaxy foldable strikes a good figure but still remains slightly behind the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 competitors. Particularly in the multi-core score of Geekbench, it turns out worse than the Xiaomi 12S Ultra or Asus Zenfone 9.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1334 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1325 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=23)
1280 Points -4%
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1232 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1198 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1135 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points -31%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4399 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=23)
4173 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4065 Points
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3600 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3542 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3485 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points -26%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057309 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=21)
997518 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
973843 Points
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
772608 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
714178 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points -28%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=22)
14796 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13983 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13983 Points
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13452 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12103 Points -13%
Vivo X Fold
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12100 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11798 Points -16%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1178 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1165 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=21)
1033 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
997 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -29%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7858 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=21)
7507 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7068 Points -10%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6342 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6252 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points -27%
System
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12839 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=21)
11842 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10837 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10047 Points -22%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9786 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points -25%
Memory
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7911 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7782 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=21)
7549 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6933 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6352 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points -20%
Graphics
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21947 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16742 - 26660, n=21)
21295 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19283 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13750 Points -29%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13654 Points -29%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1982 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1783 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=21)
1713 Points -14%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1545 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1479 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
84787 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81854 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=19)
47040 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -74%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points -87%
AImark - Score v2.x
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
254430 Points +3649%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
248961 Points +3569%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points +212%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7448 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6786 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1043 - 7865, n=11)
6385 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points -8%

In the graphics-heavy tests, the Fold4 ends up slightly ahead of the Galaxy S22 Ultra, but the foldable smartphone is still unable to reach the high values of our comparison devices with 1440p resolution and the Adreno 730

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2899 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2766 Points
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2496 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -31%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1564 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
997 Points -64%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2873 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2778 Points
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1602 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1503 Points -46%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11098 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11073 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -34%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5238 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4418 Points -60%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -7%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -25%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
445 fps +49%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
298 fps
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
243 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
173 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -8%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -8%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -38%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
247 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +28%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps -10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -44%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
189 fps +64%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -35%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -66%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -12%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -43%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -21%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -50%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -65%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -25%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -45%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -38%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -67%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +28%
Vivo X Fold
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps +10%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -24%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -40%

In the browser benchmarks, the Fold4 impresses with attractive results and a smooth performance when surfing using the Chrome browser. Aside from Internet activities, the Samsung smartphone also offers a high system performance with smooth animations and without any major stutters.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
152.211 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)
121.1 Points -20%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
108.34 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
85.6 Points -44%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
116 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)
111.4 runs/min -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min -7%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -8%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
80.8 runs/min -30%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
62.5 runs/min -46%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
131 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)
111 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
102 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -24%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
174 Points
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 (Chrome 97)
161 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
156 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
142 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
52642 Points
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
47543 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)
41373 Points -21%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
36742 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33640 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
33404 Points -37%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -99%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -57%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
1102.2 ms * -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)
1047 ms * -31%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G (Chrome 92)
959 ms * -20%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 (Chrome 97)
891 ms * -11%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G (Chrome 105)
799.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

The nominally fast UFS 3.1 storage used in the Galaxy smartphone confirms its high performance capabilities also in the AndroBench benchmark. With write rates above 1,250 Mbit/s, the Fold4 performs significantly better than the predecessor. In our experience, the higher-priced versions with 512 GB and 1 TB should even be slightly faster.     

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GMicrosoft Surface Duo 2Vivo X FoldSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GXiaomi 12S UltraAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-23%
-8%
10%
-6%
26%
-3%
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB
1854.98
1934
4%
1818
-2%
1850.6
0%
1653
-11%
1963.45
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
1251.57
790
-37%
754
-40%
1405
12%
1074
-14%
1475.43
18%
Random Read 4KB
321.87
215.5
-33%
287.1
-11%
293.4
-9%
322.3
0%
309.21
-4%
Random Write 4KB
265.9
195.7
-26%
324.7
22%
358.1
35%
273.1
3%
489.58
84%

Games - Galaxy Z Fold4 reaches 120 fps

We take a closer look at the gaming performance with the GameBench app. Both of our test games use the full area of the 7.6-inch display. PUBG Mobile can be played at low detail settings at a frame rate of almost 60 fps, and at the highest detail level until now (UHD), the average frame rate is 40 fps. As expected, the Armajet arena shooter, which supports 144 fps in theory, turns out even smoother. At 118 fps, the Fold4 performance is above average here. We don't see a real drop in the frame rate here - unlike in other smartphones with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1.  

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G; Armajet: Ø117.5 (105-121)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø57.6 (52-60)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø57.5 (48-60)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø55.1 (41-61)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (26-42)

Emissions - Samsung smartphone stays fairly cool

Temperatures

Even though the Samsung foldable gets warm in our load scenario, it doesn't get uncomfortably hot. It will be interesting to see, whether the low heat development still has a negative effect on the performance capabilities of the Qualcom SoC, as in the Asus Zenfone 9 or Xiaomi 12S Ultra

We evaluate the behavior of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 under constant load with the GFXBench battery test. Even though the test is completed successfully, we are unable to display the results without the app closing. We have better success with the 3DMark stress tests, where we get values between 54 and 62%, attesting the Fold4 with relatively inconsistent performance capabilities. However, when we look at the competitors that are not foldable, we see similar problems with the throttling, even though the Samsung foldable already reduces its performance very early in the test.  

Max. Load
 28.1 °C
83 F
33 °C
91 F
32.8 °C
91 F
 
 28.6 °C
83 F
28.8 °C
84 F
34 °C
93 F
 
 27.2 °C
81 F
30 °C
86 F
31.1 °C
88 F
 
Maximum: 34 °C = 93 F
Average: 30.4 °C = 87 F
31.6 °C
89 F
33.4 °C
92 F
28.2 °C
83 F
31.2 °C
88 F
33.4 °C
92 F
28.1 °C
83 F
30.4 °C
87 F
30.2 °C
86 F
28 °C
82 F
Maximum: 33.4 °C = 92 F
Average: 30.5 °C = 87 F
Room Temperature 21.8 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.3 % +27%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % +9%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.6 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.1 % +25%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.8 % +22%
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71.3 % +14%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.3 %
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % -1%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø12 (10.4-16.6)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø5.17 (5.07-6.49)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø7.24 (6.58-9.23)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø14.3 (12.6-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø42.2 (33.4-62.3)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø20.4 (19.2-31)
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.3 (23.8-34.8)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø51.6 (33.9-63)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø32.3 (26.8-43.4)

Speakers

The dual-speaker system of the Fold4 is probably the same as in the Fold3, but this isn't a bad thing, since the sound qualities are very impressive, considering the slim case of the foldable. The sound reproduction is linear and even offers a fair amount of bass. We really like the sound experience, despite the super high tones having slightly less presence. 

You can connect wired headphones or external speakers using the USB-C connection. Those who prefer Bluetooth for wireless sound output can use the SBC, AAC, aptX, and LDAC audio codecs. However, Qualcomm's aptX HD and aptX Adaptive are not supported. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043382530.431.93123.226.24023.322.45036.436.36324.125.38020.32610017.63212515.742.316013.853.520016.255.425015.156.331512.65940013.159.550013.165.863012.766.280014.768.4100013.470.3125012.870.9160012.875.8200012.875250013.275.1315013.774.8400013.978.8500013.177.9630013.978.6800013.378.2100001470.81250014.265.81600013.659.4SPL25.687.4N0.770.4median 13.6median 70.3Delta0.9835.831.532.237.125.123.6212434.435.22426.228.924.222.829.817.640.219.254.415.856.215.55915.762.31363.912.469.614.468.314.771.712.876.914.676.413.573.813.176.613.574.613.477.913.381.413.379.413.475.213.774.313.27613.270.312.265.125.988.70.776.7median 13.5median 73.80.97.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5GSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Galaxy Z Fold4 with a low consumption

Power Consumption

We measure the power consumption of the Fold4 with the large main display. During idle operation as well as under load, the foldable has a similar power consumption as the Xiaomi 12S Ultra, which also uses the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1. During the GFXBench benchmark, the power consumption drops considerably, which is (probably) due to the throttling.

The Galaxy Foldable uses a "Super Fast Charging" technology, which is limited to 25 watts for wired charging and 15 watts for wireless charging, similar to the predecessor. Wireless PowerShare at 5 watts is also included. Using the corresponding Samsung charger (25 watts), it takes almost 2 hours to completely recharge the smartphone.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.89 / 0.96 / 1.13 Watt
Load midlight 4.32 / 6.56 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
4400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
4400 mAh
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
4449 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-18%
-88%
-16%
1%
-50%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
1.02
-15%
1.55
-74%
0.58
35%
0.9
-1%
1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19)
-14%
Idle Average *
0.96
1.18
-23%
2.43
-153%
0.71
26%
1
-4%
1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19)
-95%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.27
-12%
2.52
-123%
1.16
-3%
1.2
-6%
2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19)
-79%
Load Average *
4.32
5.25
-22%
6.7
-55%
7.07
-64%
3.5
19%
5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19)
-32%
Load Maximum *
6.56
7.74
-18%
8.74
-33%
11.32
-73%
6.9
-5%
8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.41 (1.113-10.7)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø4.8 (0.957-9.02)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.73 (3.87-12.7)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.7 (8.53-8.86)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.92 (0.845-1.504)
Xiaomi 12S Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.992 (0.918-1.223)

Battery Life

The battery of the Galaxy Z Fold4 offers a capacity of 4,400 mAh, so nothing has changed compared to the predecessor here. At an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m², the battery life is at a slightly better level. Our comparison devices are best compared at the same brightness. With 11 hours in our WLAN test and 19 hours in the video test, the foldable places just ahead of the Fold3.

If we use the smaller exterior display, we end up at 711 minutes in the WLAN test, which is only about an hour longer than with the significantly larger main display. Together with the fairly low idle runtime, this points at a relatively power-hungry WLAN module in the Fold4.  

Note: The battery life values were measured for a decrease of the battery level from 100 to 4%. At that point, the Fold4 enters into a power-saving mode, and all the apps are automatically closed.  

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
21h 16min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 105)
11h 03min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 13min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 58min
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G
4400 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G
4400 mAh
Microsoft Surface Duo 2
4449 mAh
Vivo X Fold
4600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
-34%
5%
37%
29%
Reader / Idle
1276
1257
-1%
1973
55%
1766
38%
H.264
1153
1004
-13%
1078
-7%
1112
-4%
WiFi v1.3
663
610
-8%
438
-34%
698
5%
844
27%
951
43%
Load
238
330
39%
410
72%
327
37%

Pros

+ bright OLED display
+ compact mini tablet
+ long software support
+ robust chassis including IPX8 certification
+ powerful SoC

Cons

- UDC still not optimal
- no storage expansion
- slow 25W charging
- display seam stands out
- thick and heavy case

Verdict on the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

Testing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4. Test unit provided by Samsung Germany.
Testing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4. Test unit provided by Samsung Germany.

With the newest version of the Galaxy Z Fold series, the Korean manufacturer again succeeded in creating a powerful foldable smartphone. Compared to the Fold3, the Fold4 offers several improvements, but Samsung remains behind our expectations with its foldable series this year. The Samsung smartphone looks just like the predecessor and also feels very similar. So with the 2022 Fold model the latest, we get the impression of a stagnation for the foldables from the Korean manufacturer, since the following complaints about the predecessor weren't really addressed: 

The very visible UD camera of Fold3 is again used almost unchanged, although some other manufacturers such as Xiaomi with the Mix 4 or ZTE with the Axon 40 Ultra have already shown that it can be done better. The display seam of the Fold4 also still looks very present, even though Vivo, for example, hardly shows any seam in the folding area of its X Fold. Even though Samsung has reduced the case thickness and weight of Fold4 slightly, Xiaomi already shows impressively this year with the Mi Fold 2 where this development should go. The advertised "Super Fast Charging" technology at 25 watts also looks almost quaint in a 1,800-Euro smartphone in 2022.  

Long software support and robust hardware. Those who are looking for a foldable smartphone can safely choose a Fold4 without any concerns. 

However, aside from our complaints, the Fold4 is still a very interesting choice for those who love foldable smartphones, also because there is a lack of any real competition. The real value of the Samsung foldable depends on the value the individual user places on the unusual format ratio of the main display in everyday operation.   

The only real alternatives to the Galaxy smartphone can be found in imported foldables from China. Here, we could mention the Oppo Find N, the Xiaomi Mi Fold 2, and the Vivo X Fold. Even though you can also get a Huawei Mate Xs 2 in Germany, due to its well-known software restrictions and the high price considering the overall package it is not a good option. 

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Price and Availability

The Galaxy Z Fold4 is currently available from Amazon starting from $1499 (with both the 256GB and 512GB version costing the same at the time of the test).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G - 09/27/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
67 / 70 → 96%
Weight
87%
Battery
90%
Display
93%
Games Performance
62 / 64 → 98%
Application Performance
92 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 87%
Camera
79%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 5G review - Improved foldable smartphone shatters dreams of foldables
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-10- 4 (Update: 2022-10-18)