Notebookcheck Logo

Asus Zenfone 9 review - Light 5G smartphone almost without any alternative with its compact size

Small but without compromises? The Asus Zenfone 9 is particularly attractive with its compact design. At the same time, the Asus smartphone also offers very powerful hardware with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, 16 GB of RAM, and a gimbal main camera. Find out in our review whether a purchase of the lightweight smartphone is worthwhile.
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

For those who like compact smartphones, Asus also offers a suitable companion this year. As already in the Zenfone 8, the Taiwanese manufacturer continues to use a 5.9-inch AMOLED panel with a 1080-pixel resolution. However, the refresh rate of the Zenfone 9 display has increased to 120 Hz, and the screen-to-body ratio has also become slightly more efficient. 

With the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, the compact case of the high-end smartphone houses a flagship SoC, which is accompanied by up to 16 GB of LPDDR5-RAM and a maximum of 256 GB UFS 3.1 storage. The basic version of the Zenfone 9 starts at 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage at an MSRP of 799 Euros (~$801), and the top model with 16 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage costs 899 Euros (~$901). 

On the back, the two large camera lenses stand out. The main camera offers a 50-Megapixel sensor from Sony, which is stabilized with a gimbal OIS system on six axes.  

Asus Zenfone 9 (Zenfone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
5.90 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen , AMOLED , glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 218 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n28/​n38/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.1 x 146.5 x 68.1 ( = 0.36 x 5.77 x 2.68 in)
Battery
4300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.9, OIS) + 12 MP (f/​2.2, wide angle lens), camera2API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/​2.45)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo , Keyboard: onscreen, USB power adapter, USB cable, phone case, SIM tool, ZenUI, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
169 g ( = 5.96 oz / 0.37 pounds), Power Supply: 108 g ( = 3.81 oz / 0.24 pounds)
Price
899 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.6 %
09/2022
Asus Zenfone 9
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.90"2400x1080
87.7 %
03/2022
Xiaomi 12
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
179 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.28"2400x1080
89.3 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
87 %
08/2022
OnePlus 10T
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
203.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
85.6 %
07/2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
85.9 %
06/2021
Asus ZenFone 8
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.92"2400x1080

Case - Asus smartphone with a punch hole

Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

Weighing just 169 grams (~6 oz) and with a size of 146.5 x 68.1 x 9.1 mm (~5.76 x 2.68 x 0.36 in), the Zenfone 9 is a tad smaller than the Zenfone 8 in all dimensions. In contrast to most representatives of the top end such as the OnePlus 10T, the Asus smartphone is built very compact and conveniently small. 

For the back, Asus uses a newly developed structured surface material that is supposed to be extremely resilient, according to the manufacturer. The material, which is available in the four colors Moonlight White, Starry Blue, Sunset Red, and Midnight Black, feels a bit like suede and doesn't show many fingerprints. However, you can have different opinions about the qualitative impression and haptics compared to glass or ceramic materials, in our view. In addition, the surface is hard to clean. 

The front of the Asus smartphone is made of a scratchproof Gorilla Glass Victus display glass, which transitions evenly into the metal frame. The surface-to display ratio in front is a solid 84%. For our tastes, the display bezels could have turned out even smaller, though. Compared to the larger competitors, such as the Xiaomi 12 at more than 89%, the Zenfone 9 is clearly surpassed in this regard. 

Like its predecessor, the Zenfone 9 also offers an official IP-certification according to the IP68 standard, providing some protection against dust and water. Considering the high-quality workmanship, the overall impression of the high-end smartphone offers no reason for complaint.

Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

Size Comparison

163 mm / 6.42 inch 75.4 mm / 2.97 inch 8.75 mm / 0.3445 inch 203.5 g0.4486 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 193.5 g0.4266 lbs152.7 mm / 6.01 inch 69.9 mm / 2.75 inch 8.66 mm / 0.3409 inch 179 g0.3946 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 68.5 mm / 2.7 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 169 g0.3726 lbs146.5 mm / 5.77 inch 68.1 mm / 2.68 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 169 g0.3726 lbs146 mm / 5.75 inch 70.6 mm / 2.78 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 167 g0.3682 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment - Zenfone 9 with 3.5-mm audio port

In terms of equipment, the Zenfone 9 offers a dual-speaker system, Bluetooth 5.2, an NFC chip for contactless payment, and a 3.5-mm audio port. The top version with 256 GB of UFS storage that we tested offers 218 GB of available space to the user. In addition, there is dual-SIM functionality, but the card tray, as in its predecessor, doesn't accept microSD cards.

On the other hand, you can connect external peripheral devices such as storage media to the Asus smartphone via the USB-C port. But unfortunately, that still supports only the 2.0 standard. Not only is it significantly slower than that of a Galaxy S22 with USB 3.2, but it also doesn't support wired display output.

Left case side
Left case side
Right case side (on/off key and volume rocker)
Right case side (on/off key and volume rocker)
Bottom (speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot)
Bottom (speaker, USB port, microphone, SIM slot)
Top (3.5-mm audio port, microphone)
Top (3.5-mm audio port, microphone)

Software - Asus smartphone with Android 12

In addition to the compact size, Asus also focusses on optimal one-hand operation in terms of the software. The ZenUI-9 user interface based on Android 12 offers a configurable Edge Tool on the side, providing comfortable quick-access to apps. 

The security patches on our test unit are at the level of August 2022 at the time of our testing. There are only supposed to be updates for the first two years after the introduction of the smartphone, so until 2024. 

Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

Communication and GNSS - Asus Zenfone 9 with 5G

Within the WLAN at home, the Zenfone 9 offer the fast 802.11ax standard with Wi-Fi 6E, ensuring very high transfer rates in our measurements. However, the 6-GHz frequency band is not recognized in combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router. On the other hand, the Asus smartphone also reaches a fast 900 Mbit/s in the 5-GHz frequency range. In addition, the values are very stable.   

Besides the fast WLAN, the Zenfone 9 also uses the 5G standard, but without mmWave support. In addition, the compact high-end smartphone offers access to a total of 20 LTE bands, with all the LTE frequencies that are relevant for the German-speaking countries including band 28 being covered. 

Networking
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
919 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
938 (min: 470) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1715 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1602 (min: 797) MBit/s ∼91%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
854 (min: 763) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
757 (min: 380) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1407 (min: 872) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1751 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
763 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
823 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼88%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
934 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
933 (min: 865) MBit/s ∼99%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
946 (min: 926) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
598 (min: 517) MBit/s ∼34%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
1261 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
903 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
655 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
692 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1536 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1364 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 receive AX12
376 (min: 376) MBit/s ∼42%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1689 (801-1773)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1407 (872-1714)
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1574 (797-1629)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1722 (879-1776)
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø918 (892-936)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø854 (763-898)
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø922 (470-957)
Xiaomi 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø745 (380-826)
Locating indoors
Locating indoors
Locating outdoors
Locating outdoors

To determine its location, the Zenfone 9 uses the GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BeiDou (B1, B2), and Galileo (E1+E5) satellite systems. In order to evaluate the locating accuracy in practice, we take the Asus smartphone on a little ride, recording the route in parallel with a Garmin Venu 2 for comparison. 

The locating capabilities of the Zenfone 9 are mostly convincing. Despite some smaller inaccuracies in the recorded route, the Asus smartphone is very well suited for navigation tasks. We hardly notice any larger deviations from our selected route in the details of the GPS recording. 

Asus Zenfone 9 vs. Garmin Venu 2
Asus Zenfone 9 vs. Garmin Venu 2

Telephone Functions and Voice Quality - Asus smartphone with dual-SIM

Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

The Zenfone 9 supports two nano SIM cards as well as the VoLTE standard and WLAN calls, but there is no eSIM. The voice quality is inconspicuous. Voices are reproduced clearly, and our conversation partner also describes them as very clear. With two built-in microphones, the Asus smartphone is also able to score in a video conference - testet via Skype - and with the dual speaker system.

Cameras - Zenfone 9 with dual-camera system

Selfie taken with the Zenfone 9
Selfie taken with the Zenfone 9

In front, Asus uses a Sony IMX663 with a 12-MP resolution. The selfie camera with autofocus delivers a comfortable sharpness, colors that are rich in contrast, and a good illumination during daylight. The camera, which is hidden underneath a punch hole, records videos in UHD quality at most, which produces great Vlogging results in combination with the phase detection autofocus.  

The main camera in the Zenfone 9 is based on the IMX766, a sensor that we already know since it is used in numerous smartphones, such as the OnePlus 10T or Nothing Phone 1. Under good light conditions, the recordings impress with a good sharpness, but the edges are slightly over-sharpened. Overall, the dynamic in the pictures could turn out slightly better. Under low-light conditions, the Asus smartphone quickly hits its limits. Despite a large aperture of f/1.9, the recordings turn out very dark, so that only few details remain. However, thanks to the 6-axis hybrid gimbal technology, the sharpness is satisfactory. 

The ultrawide angle lens with a relatively wide viewing angle of 113 degrees offers a decent image quality including a macro function. Although the photos show slightly pale colors, they offer a good basic sharpness and medium level of detail. Since the Zenfone 9 doesn't offer sufficient space for a tele lens, enlargements are solely created digitally. The results are correspondingly weak. 

On the other hand, there are hardly any compromises in terms of the video performance. The stabilization of the 50-MP camera is very good for this price class, and in daylight, most movements are compensated by the gimbal technology. In addition, the Pro video mode allows you to adjust many parameters manually. However, you can still see some micro stutters of the Zenfone 9 at night. In addition to UHD recordings (3,840 × 2,160) at 30 frames per second, the main camera also offers an 8K option. While you can switch between the lenses while recording, this is not possible in the Hyper Steady mode.  

Ultrawide angle
Wide angle
2x zoom
8x zoom (max)
50-MP mode
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelLow LightUltraweitwinkelZoom 5x
click to load images

We analyze the color reproduction of the 50-MP lens under controlled light conditions compared to the actual reference colors. Besides the brightening that is typical for smartphones, the Zenfone 9 shows relatively low deviations in the ColorChecker passport. The Asus smartphone doesn't show any high outliers in the color accuracy (>15) at all. On the other hand, the white balance could turn out better. 

ColorChecker
6.5 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenfone 9: 5.23 ∆E min: 1.69 - max: 11.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.8 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
34.4 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
25 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
23 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
22 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenfone 9: 22.06 ∆E min: 10.88 - max: 34.35 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Asus Zenfone 9 with charger

The charger is included with the Zenfone 9
The charger is included with the Zenfone 9

A modular 30-Watt charger, data/charging cable (USB-C to USB-C), protective cover, SIM tool, and quick start manual together with warranty instructions are included with the Zenfone 9. 

Optionally, the manufacturer also offers a special modular Connex case system (MSRP: 50 Euros, ~$50), which in addition to its protective function also offers a connection system for backpacks and a Connex Card holder to keep your ID or credit cards.

Asus offers a 24-month warranty to its smartphone in Germany.

Input Devices and Operation - Asus smartphone with FaceUnlock

Inputs on the 5.9-inch OLED display are recognized accurately up to the corners of the touchscreen. With its scan rate of 240 Hz, the Zenfone 9 panel is checked for touch inputs up to 240 times per second, for example when gaming, ensuring low latencies of touch inputs. 

In addition to the compact size, the one-handed operation of the Asus smartphone also benefits from the ZenTouch multi-function key and gesture control on the back. The latter can be triggered by double tapping on the back to start the flashlight function, for example. The central key element on the right case side not only recognizes fingerprints to unlock the display but also offers gesture control, for example to open the notification bar or control the media player.

The integrated, optical fingerprint sensor in the power button unlocks the Zenfone 9 very reliably and also quickly. A fairly insecure 2D face recognition, which is based on a FaceUnlock function via the front camera, is also available. 

Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

Display - Asus smartphone with OLED

Subpixel grid display
Subpixel grid display

The Zenfone has a 5.9-inch AMOLED display with a 2,400 x 1,080-pixel resolution that supports a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. Those who want to save a little power can also configure the display to use 90 Hz or 60 Hz. The Asus smartphone also offers an automatic mode. However, in our test only refresh rates of 60 and 90 Hz are used, but not 120 Hz. 

In our brightness measurements, the OLED panel reaches 800 cd/m² with a completely white display, which is satisfactory for this price class. In the APL18 measurement, which is more realistic for everyday operation, it reaches 1,070 cd/m² in the center of the display. This is also a good value, but the Galaxy S22 can still get slightly brighter at 1,296 cd/m². 

Due to the OLED panel technology, the Zenfone 9 uses PWM with its display flickering to control the brightness. Below a display brightness of 75%, the PWM frequency varies between 119 and 478 Hz. Up to the maximum brightness, the amplitude becomes more even and constant at 120 Hz. There is also a DC Dimming mode (60 Hz) in the settings. In our temporal dithering test, the behavior of the Zenfone 9 doesn't stand out.  

804
cd/m²
796
cd/m²
786
cd/m²
806
cd/m²
793
cd/m²
787
cd/m²
808
cd/m²
791
cd/m²
794
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 808 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 796.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.92 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 793 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Asus Zenfone 9
AMOLED , 2400x1080, 5.90
Xiaomi 12
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
OnePlus 10T
Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Asus ZenFone 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.92
Screen
4%
6%
-9%
9%
-12%
Brightness middle
793
867
9%
853
8%
861
9%
620
-22%
758
-4%
Brightness
796
867
9%
858
8%
856
8%
625
-21%
759
-5%
Brightness Distribution
97
98
1%
96
-1%
97
0%
98
1%
98
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
1.7
11%
1.9
-0%
2.27
-19%
1.24
35%
3.5
-84%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.4
4.4
-29%
3.2
6%
4.17
-23%
2.31
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
1.8
22%
1.9
17%
2.9
-26%
1.7
26%
1.6
30%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
2.07 106%
2.303 96%
2.318 95%
2.23 99%
CCT
6860 95%
6762 96%
6460 101%
6141 106%
6325 103%
6527 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 478 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 478 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 478 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
maximum manual display brightness
100%

Measurement series at a fixed zoom level with various brightness settings

The high-end smartphone offers 4 color profiles and an "Adjusted" mode where you can adjust the color temperature and intensity. We evaluate the color calibration of the AMOLED panels with the CalMAN analysis software. 

In the default settings (profile: Natural), the larger P3 color space is targeted and also covered to a large extent. The DeltaE values that we measure show very low deviations in the colors (<2). We can see some minimal differences in the green and turquoise colors. The reproduction of the Grayscale also shows fairly low deviations that remain within the target range (<3).

Color accuracy (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)
Color accuracy (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)
Color space (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)
Color space (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)
Grayscale (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)
Grayscale (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)
Saturation (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)
Saturation (color target space: P3; profile: Natural, max. Warm)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8655 ms rise
↘ 0.78 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.828 ms rise
↘ 0.8225 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

The high-end smartphone shows itself to be very well-equipped for outdoor use in everyday operation. Due to the high brightness and powerful contrasts, the contents always remain sufficiently readable even in direct sunlight. However, you should be aware that the maximum brightness without the brightness sensor is only 446 cd/m² and that reflections on the glass surface should basically be avoided.

Due to OLED technology, the viewing angle stability is very good, and we only notice a loss in brightness from very steep viewing angles. There are hardly any noticeable changes in the colors.

Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review


Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

Performance - Zenfone 9 with Qualcomm SoC

Despite the compact dimensions of the Zenfone, Asus uses the powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 together with 16 GB of LPDDR5-RAM. In our benchmark package, the Qualcomm SoC delivers a very powerful performance, leaving the competitors mostly far behind. Particularly the multi-core result of the Zenfone 9 turns out very high in Geekbench. Even under longer load, the Asus smartphone doesn't report any overheating protection, and all of the benchmarks complete without interruptions. 

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1322 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=23)
1280 Points -3%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1277 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1237 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points -13%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1124 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=217, last 2 years)
918 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points -38%
Multi-Core
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
4436 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=23)
4173 Points -6%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
3987 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3581 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points -22%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3385 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=217, last 2 years)
3009 Points -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points -32%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1081005 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=21)
997518 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
982789 Points -9%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
846323 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points -25%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
795730 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
16528 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16428 Points -1%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
15944 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=22)
14796 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14508 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=213, last 2 years)
11798 Points -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -29%
CrossMark - Overall
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1163 Points
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1109 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=21)
1033 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -28%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
806 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points -35%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8320 Points +1%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8273 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=21)
7507 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points -15%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6860 Points -17%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6043 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=165, last 2 years)
5745 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points -42%
System
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
12637 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
12230 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=21)
11842 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10334 Points -18%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9973 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=165, last 2 years)
9678 Points -23%
Memory
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8822 Points +7%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8263 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=21)
7549 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6535 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points -22%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6300 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=165, last 2 years)
6250 Points -24%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points -42%
Graphics
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
24037 Points +5%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
22938 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16742 - 26660, n=21)
21295 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
18370 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=165, last 2 years)
14101 Points -39%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
13167 Points -43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points -64%
Web
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1982 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points -3%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1833 Points -8%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1785 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=21)
1713 Points -14%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1612 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=165, last 2 years)
1494 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -36%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)
21146 Points +193%
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
7208 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
6955 Points -4%
Xiaomi 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6766 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6487 Points -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1043 - 7865, n=11)
6385 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5823 Points -19%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Asus Zenfone 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
82462 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=19)
47040 Points -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points -74%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points -75%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
11648 Points -86%

In the graphics tests, the Zenfone 9 also delivers a powerful performance with the Adreno 730, but the differences to the OnePlus 10T are lower here, and some of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 competitors even end up ahead of the Asus smartphone. This could be connected to the pronounced throttling of the Asus smartphone.   

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2876 Points +7%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2698 Points
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2418 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1855 Points -31%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1512 Points -44%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -75%
Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2824 Points +3%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2586 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1946 Points -29%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1528 Points -45%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -75%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11087 Points
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10989 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9782 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7458 Points -33%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5821 Points -47%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2576 Points -77%
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9713 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7064 Points
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5767 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2570 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +1%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -6%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
435 fps +14%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
428 fps +12%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -21%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
238 fps -38%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +3%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -36%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -48%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
221 fps +26%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
213 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps +10%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
176 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
152 fps -14%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -53%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +28%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93 fps +6%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -34%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps +50%
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
164 fps +44%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +8%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps -8%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -44%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +5%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -22%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -22%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -57%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +29%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -20%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -27%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -56%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps -20%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -41%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -52%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -74%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps 0%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -34%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -41%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -66%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
93 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -33%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -39%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -42%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +10%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -40%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -64%

In everyday operation and while browsing, the Asus smartphone leaves an excellent impression. The performance and the benchmark results are first-class. Particularly the short system animations of the ZenUI make the high-end smartphone appear very responsive.   

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
147.648 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)
121.1 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
113.8 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
96.4 Points -35%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
81.383 Points -45%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points -50%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)
111.4 runs/min +9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
111 runs/min +9%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min +5%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
107 runs/min +5%
Asus Zenfone 9
102 runs/min
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
93.4 runs/min -8%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -47%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
168 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points -5%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
149 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
149 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
148 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -21%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
106 Points -37%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points -39%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
54646 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)
41373 Points -24%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
39982 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
38992 Points -29%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
37926 Points -31%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
37279 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=211, last 2 years)
33640 Points -38%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -55%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -134%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
1627.3 ms * -112%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -108%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
1566 ms * -104%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
1397 ms * -82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)
1047 ms * -36%
Xiaomi 12 (Chrome 99.0.4844.58)
930 ms * -21%
Asus Zenfone 9 (Chrome 104)
768.66 ms *

* ... smaller is better

The 256-GB UFS storage in the Zenfone 9 delivers high read and write rates. At almost 1,800 Mbit/s the write speed is really powerful.

Asus Zenfone 9Xiaomi 12Samsung Galaxy S22OnePlus 10TNothing Phone (1)Asus ZenFone 8Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
-28%
-41%
-26%
-25%
-19%
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
1986.97
1851
-7%
1486
-25%
1568.37
-21%
1638
-18%
1781
-10%
1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
1776.21
1417
-20%
993
-44%
847.69
-52%
1351.9
-24%
767
-57%
1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87)
-36%
Random Read 4KB
298.46
325.2
9%
273
-9%
173.45
-42%
240.6
-19%
292.3
-2%
Random Write 4KB
398.39
437.5
10%
257.6
-35%
211.24
-47%
228.2
-43%
272.9
-31%

Games - Asus Zenfone 9 reaches 120 fps

We evaluate the gaming capabilities of the compact high-end smartphones using the application of our partner GameBench, also recording the exact frame rates per second. 

PUBG Mobile runs nice and smooth. Up to the HD setting, 60 fps are possible, and the Zenfone 9 reaches stable 40 fps with the UHD option. The frame rates in Armajet turn out similarly attractive. The Asus reaches 110 frames per second here, which is significantly more than the Xiaomi 12 or Galaxy S22.   

Armajet
Armajet
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 9; Armajet: Ø93.5 (67-120)
Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.3 (50-61)
Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.9 (59-61)
Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (57-61)
Asus Zenfone 9; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.8 (35-41)

Emissions - Asus smartphone only warms up to a limited extent

Temperatures

GFXBench benchmark
GFXBench benchmark

The surface temperatures of the case are relatively low for a smartphone with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1, even under load. Particularly considering the compact build, the Zenfone 9 produces relatively low heat, but this also goes to the detriment of the performance.

The high-end smartphone completes the battery tests of GFXBench without any interruptions, even the demanding Manhattan Test (OpenGL ES 3.1), although we are unable to evaluate that. The Wild Life stress tests of 3DMark also complete without any problems, but the Qualcomm SoC is throttled noticeably here. At about 50%, the Zenfone 9 is significantly less constant than the predecessor. On the other hand, other smartphones with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1, such as the Xiaomi 12S Pro, have similar thermal problems, also reducing their performance correspondingly. 

Max. Load
 35.1 °C
95 F
35 °C
95 F
34.2 °C
94 F
 
 35.1 °C
95 F
34.7 °C
94 F
34.1 °C
93 F
 
 33.9 °C
93 F
34.8 °C
95 F
33.5 °C
92 F
 
Maximum: 35.1 °C = 95 F
Average: 34.5 °C = 94 F
32.2 °C
90 F
33.2 °C
92 F
34.7 °C
94 F
31.5 °C
89 F
33.6 °C
92 F
34.6 °C
94 F
30.2 °C
86 F
32.8 °C
91 F
35 °C
95 F
Maximum: 35 °C = 95 F
Average: 33.1 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  25.4 °C = 78 F | Room Temperature 21.8 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +87%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92.7 % +75%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92.3 % +74%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56.4 % +6%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.1 %
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46.3 % -13%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +88%
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85.5 % +62%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 % +6%
Asus Zenfone 9
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52.8 %
Xiaomi 12
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.3 (8.84-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø7.78 (6.63-11.8)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14)
Asus Zenfone 9 Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.8 (33.4-62.9)
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø35.6 (27.5-59.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø27.2 (23.6-41.9)
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (59-63.6)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review
Asus Zenfone 9 smartphone review

Speakers

In terms of audio, the Zenfone 9 stands out with good stereo speakers, a wide selection of supported Bluetooth codecs including LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, and a 3.5-mm audio port including Qualcomm's Aqstic WCD9380 DAC. The latter shows a very low noise level in our test (SNR: 98.6 dBFS). 

The two speakers produce a high maximum volume of 88 dB and a full sound. On the other hand, both the mids and highs could have turned out slightly more linear. The superhigh frequencies also drop significantly in the Zenfone 9. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204338.22530.437.23123.225.24023.3265036.437.86324.125.18020.331.110017.634.912515.741.416013.846.720016.250.125015.152.731512.659.440013.159.450013.162.463012.766.380014.766.9100013.468.9125012.873.5160012.877200012.879.5250013.278.3315013.778.6400013.978.4500013.177630013.975.6800013.373.3100001467.41250014.264.71600013.658.7SPL25.688N0.769median 13.6median 67.4Delta0.99.637.439.52830.932.628.127.7303435.82730.123.630.322.328.317.733.916.148.712.846.813.152.71258.2959.91165.310.768.310.373.510.976.312.178.111.878.61278.811.880.511.980.712.979.113.37713.47113.575.913.669.814.869.614.166.324.689.50.677median 12.8median 711.210hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenfone 9Samsung Galaxy S22
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zenfone 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Zenfone 9 with Quick Charge 4.0

Power Consumption

The battery of the Asus smartphone offers a capacity of 4,300 mAh and can be recharged at a rated performance of 30 watts with Quick Charge technology in about 85 minutes. Fortunately, the corresponding charger is included with the Zenfone 9. Wireless charging, on the other hand, is missing.

Compared to the consumption of the OnePlus 10T and considering the significantly smaller OLED panel, the power consumption is slightly high. Particularly in Geekbench at an adjusted brightness of 150 cd/m², the Asus smartphone consumes a relatively high amount of power. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.37 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.01 / 1.1 / 1.17 Watt
Load midlight 3.3 / 7.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Zenfone 9
4300 mAh
Xiaomi 12
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
OnePlus 10T
4800 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Asus ZenFone 8
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-27%
-21%
4%
-11%
1%
-45%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
0.87
14%
0.69
32%
0.8
21%
1
1%
0.82
19%
1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.7
-55%
1.19
-8%
1.2
-9%
1.2
-9%
1.1
-0%
1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19)
-70%
Idle Maximum *
1.17
1.82
-56%
1.26
-8%
1.3
-11%
1.5
-28%
1.16
1%
2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19)
-73%
Load Average *
3.3
4.68
-42%
6.97
-111%
3.5
-6%
4.2
-27%
4.24
-28%
5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19)
-72%
Load Maximum *
7.89
7.41
6%
8.85
-12%
5.9
25%
7.4
6%
6.83
13%
8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19)
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Poser Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø5.49 (1.232-9.94)
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1: Ø3.88 (0.779-7.97)

Poser Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.63 (8.51-8.94)
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.67 (7.25-10.7)
Asus Zenfone 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.973 (0.905-1.632)
OnePlus 10T Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.865 (0.73-1.198)

Battery Life

In our realistic battery tests that are run at an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m² and are therefore easily comparable, the 4,300-mAh battery achieves good runtimes at a fixed refresh rate of 120 Hz. In our WLAN test, the Zenfone lasts for almost 14 hours, and in the constant video loop with the WLAN module deactivated, even 10 hours more are possible.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 05min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 104)
13h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 21min
Load (maximum brightness)
7h 42min
Asus Zenfone 9
4300 mAh
Xiaomi 12
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh
OnePlus 10T
4800 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Asus ZenFone 8
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-14%
0%
-12%
-46%
Reader / Idle
1685
2558
52%
2182
29%
1795
7%
1813
8%
H.264
1401
890
-36%
887
-37%
1646
17%
1059
-24%
WiFi v1.3
825
760
-8%
675
-18%
856
4%
926
12%
442
-46%
Load
462
385
-17%
324
-30%
332
-28%
259
-44%

Pros

+ very compact
+ bright OLED panel
+ good battery life
+ good 3.5-mm audio port
+ powerful SoC
+ very good video stabilization

Cons

- massive throttling
- only USB 2.0
- lowlight performance
- fairly thick bezels
- only 2 years of updates

Verdict on the Asus Zenfone 9

Testing the Asus Zenfone 9. Test unit provided by Asus Germany
Testing the Asus Zenfone 9. Test unit provided by Asus Germany

With its compact dimensions, the Zenfone 9 is one of the most interesting smartphones also in this year for those who like small phones. Fortunately, the 2022 model has remedied the largest problem of its predecessor, which was its bad battery life. 

Despite its compactness, there are hardly any compromises compared to the noticeably larger high-end competitors. Particularly the gimbal technology makes the Asus smartphone special, also since the Taiwanese manufacturer combines this technology with the main camera, offering a real additional value in everyday operation. Video recordings are very well stabilized by the Zenfone 9, particularly in daylight. The compact smartphone is slightly weaker in dark light conditions, also in the area of photography. 

The Zenfone 9 is a powerful upgrade compared to the predecessor. It is unfortunate that Asus will probably only deliver two large Android updates to its compact smartphone. 

Despite its small size, the Zenfone 9 doesn't have to forego a flagship SoC, even though without the corresponding throttling, it would create too much heat, similar to the Xiaomi 12S Pro. Those who want to be able to constantly use the full power of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 can take a look at the ROG Phone 6 (Pro) sibling model with active cooling. 

Besides the Samsung Galaxy S22 and Xiaomi 12 from the Android segments, another alternative would be the Apple iPhone 13 Mini.     

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Price and Availability

The Asus Zenfone 9 is available unlocked from Amazon starting from $705, for example. 

Asus Zenfone 9 - 09/12/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
53 / 70 → 76%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
60 / 64 → 94%
Application Performance
94 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
76%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 10 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Asus Zenfone 9 review - Light 5G smartphone almost without any alternative with its compact size
Marcus Herbrich, 2022-09-14 (Update: 2022-09-14)