Oppo A5 2020
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Pricecompare
Average of 7 scores (from 24 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo A5 2020
Source: Recombu Archive.org version
Oppo A5 2020 is a great phone if you’re feeling at all apprehensive about sporting a device that uses cheaper materials – none of your mates will clock this is a sub-£200 device. A big battery and display make for strong experience, even if a low resolution is a bit of a letdown.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/08/2020
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Oppo A5 2020 when judged against its price comes out very well indeed: for not much money at all, you get a device that is competent in most areas and really good in a couple.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The Oppo A5 2020 is bread-and-butter proof that you don’t need to spend a fortune for some impressive bits of kit on a smartphone. With a 5000mAh battery, a large display and an aesthetically-pleasing design to boot. The camera isn’t as strong as what we’ve seen on other budget phones, but this is still a great buy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
If you're looking for an affordable phone there are plenty of good options, this Oppo A5 included among them. Its battery life is exceptional, with near two-day life, its screen is large, and its processor ample for tasks and games. However, the screen could be higher-res and less prone to smears, while the 'quad camera' system is a total oversell.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
The Oppo A5 2020 is great for the hardcore phone user who isn’t a hardcore tech snob. A big screen and battery let you stream a lot of music and video, and play games without having to worry about running out of charge.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
The Oppo A5 2020 is just the kind of phone I end up recommending most often to friends. Its cost is low enough to make a SIM-free buy perfectly reasonable, it looks good and should have the CPU power, RAM and battery capacity to make use headache-free.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2020
Source: Unbox Archive.org version
Being at least Php 5k more affordable than the A9 2020, the A5 2020 is arguably the better choice. You don’t really lose out much: save for lower RAM, a 12-megapixel main shooter, and 8-megapixel selfie camera, you still get the majority of the A9 2020’s key features: Snapdragon 665, 5000mAh battery with USB-C charging, and stereo speakers.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/20/2019
Source: Mobygyaan Archive.org version
The OPPO A5 2020 is a smartphone made for the casual users out there. It doesn’t have any major flaws but it doesn’t offer what you pay for. There are smartphones like Realme 5 Pro, Redmi Note 7 Pro, and Vivo Z1 Pro which offer much better specs at the same price range. If you are looking for a smartphone for playing PUBG or some other heavy games ignore this one. On the other hand, if you are looking for a smartphone that comes with good speakers so you can enjoy watching videos and multitask easily then you can go for the OPPO A5 2020.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/28/2019
Foreign Reviews
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; decent speakers; long battery life; great built quality; big screen; mini jack; nice performance. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/07/2020
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 100% performance: 70% mobility: 95%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 100% performance: 70% mobility: 95%
Source: Product Test RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 88% display: 80% mobility: 92%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; large battery capacity; great speakers; NFC chip; nice connectivity. Negative: Plastic case; wide frames; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/03/2020
Source: Zoom RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; good price; powerful processor; high autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/03/2020
Source: i2Hard RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; high performance; NFC chup; long battery life; great speakers. Negative: Easy getting fingerprints.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2019
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; powerful processor; nice speakers; excellent cameras; bright design. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; nice quad cameras; large battery capacity; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/14/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; beautiful design; nice cameras; high performance; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/19/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice quad cameras; long battery life; high performance; big screen; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/29/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice cameras; decent hardware; high gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Large battery capacity; nice quad cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/22/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; nice quad cameras; decent processor; large battery capacity.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/22/2019
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN Archive.org version
Negative: Thick frames; poor display; slow charging.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 10/10/2019
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price. Negative: Only microUSB port; poor display; thick frames; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2019
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 665: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in a 11 nm LPP process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.50":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.78.86%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.