Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs AMD Ryzen 9 270

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted quietly in July 2024. The APU comes equipped with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.1 GHz along with the 16 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 55 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former.

This Ryzen AI 9 series APU shares most of the specifications with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more power-efficient version of the full Zen 5 core. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 APUs deliver a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4-powered APUs thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 375 supports LPDDR5x-7500 and DDR5-5600 RAM, and is also natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU is a lot more complex than the original XDNA was for up to 55 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Given the striking similarity in specs, we fully expect the HX 375 to perform about as well as the HX 370 for very decent but certainly not ground-breaking multi-thread performance that's mostly on par with the Core i5-13500HX and the Ryzen 7 7745HX.

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful AMD iGPU, as of mid 2024. It features 16 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 2,900 MHz. Performance-wise, the graphics adapter can be as slow as the Arc 8 or as fast as the RTX 2050 Laptop depending on the benchmark or game. On average, the 890M finds itself very close to the GTX 1650 Laptop making it possible to play 2024 AAA games at 1080p with most settings set to Low.

Naturally, the AMD iGPU is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors and it can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 375 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W if needed. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The TSMC N4P process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, power efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 270

► remove from comparison AMD R9 270

The Ryzen 9 270 is a rebadged Ryzen 9 8945HS, making it a fast mobile laptop processor. This is an APU of the Hawk Point family that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was introduced at CES 2025 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 9 270 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Its CPU performance is slated to be identical to the old Ryzen 9 8945HS and R9 7940HS.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,800 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The R9 270 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for a reasonably good, as of early 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375AMD Ryzen 9 270
CodenameStrix Point-HX (Zen 5)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 « 2 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 compare2 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock2000 - 5100 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache12 MB8 MB
L3 Cache24 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 24
4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP54 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 890M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB
Die Size178 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
95.6 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1162 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
21812 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1988 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
776 Points (85%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
8541 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3334 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
301 Points (83%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
77867 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5856 MIPS (69%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
25.1 fps (44%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
241 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
159 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
20306 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19569 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
30229 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10891 Points (46%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2867 Points (72%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
15220 Points (59%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2121 Points (83%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14728 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
431 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
277 Points (76%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
348 Points (62%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1720 Points (64%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.1 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
67.8 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
2.9 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3.6 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
49.2 Points per Watt (37%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 03:17:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17992 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19154 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1752369429s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 10 Jul 2025 05:20:26 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17992 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 17992 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19154 +0s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 19154 +0s ... 0.015s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.015s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.027s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)