Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14650HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX

Intel Core i7-14650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14650HX

The Intel Core i7-14650HX is a high-end CPU based on the new Raptor Lake architecture for large and heavy notebooks. The CPU was introduced at the beginning of 2024 and is similar to the older Core i7-13700HX except for slightly higher CPU clock rates (max 200 MHz).

The total of 24 threads are divided into P-cores and E-cores, which we already know from Alder-Lake. The 13700HX offers 8 performance cores (P-cores) with hyperthreading and 8 efficiency cores (E-cores) without hyperthreading. A total of 20 threads are therefore supported. The P-cores clock from 2.2 to 5.2 GHz (single core) or 4.5 GHz (all cores) and the E-cores from 1.6 to 3.7 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports a maximum of DDR5 with 4800 MHz (and not 5600 MHz like the i9 HX models).

Compared to Alder Lake, the new Raptor Lake architecture offers improved P-cores (Raptor Cove architecture with more cache), more E-cores (same Gracemont architecture) and higher clock rates thanks to the improved Intel 7 process. Furthermore, Intel now supports faster DDR5 main memory in the top models (up to 5600 MHz in the i9).

The performance should be slightly above the older Core i7-13700HX (with the same TDP settings and cooling). This makes the CPU ideal for demanding tasks and games.

The 14650HX continues to be manufactured using Intel's improved 10nm FinFET process (Intel 7 process) and is specified with 55 watts of base power and 157 watts of turbo power.

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

► remove from comparison Ryzen 9 7945HX Dragon Range CPU

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a flagship 16-core Dragon Range refresh lineup laptop processor that debuted in April 2025. The product offers 16 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (32 threads) running at 2.4 GHz to 5.3 GHz, along with a rather basic Radeon 610M RDNA 2 architecture iGPU. This Ryzen 9 8000 APU is essentially a Ryzen 9 7940HX with the Turbo clock speed increased by 100 MHz.

The 8940HX is composed of three dies made on two different nodes (5 nm for CPU cores; 6 nm for other componentry). It features a very healthy 28 PCIe 5 lanes for connecting graphics cards and SSDs as fast as 15.75 GB/s. The RAM controller is limited to DDR5-5200 or slower; there is no NPU and no Thunderbolt support, the product page on amd.com indicates, but the clock multiplier is unlocked for easy overclocking.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring the 8940HX as of April 2025, we do have some Cinebench benchmark scores for the 7940HX. Based on those, the newer Ryzen 9 should have no trouble beating the Core i9-13950HX, Core i9-13980HX and Core i9-14900HX.

That being said, with this many cores the APU will probably do a much better job serving content creators rather than gamers.

Power consumption

Much like the 7940HX, the 8940HX has a base TDP (long-term power limit) of 55 watts that can officially be jacked up to as high as 75 watts. To dissipate 50+ watts, at least one high-RPM fan is needed.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX

► remove from comparison Ryzen 9 7945HX Dragon Range CPU

The AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX is a higher-end 12-core Dragon Range refresh lineup processor that debuted in April 2025 and is primarily targeted at gaming laptops. The product offers 12 SMT-enabled Zen 4 cores (24 threads) running at 2.9 GHz to 5.1 GHz, along with a rather basic Radeon 610M RDNA 2 architecture iGPU. This Ryzen 7 8000 APU is essentially a Ryzen 9 7845HX with the base clock speed and Turbo clock speed cut by 100 MHz each.

The 8840HX is composed of three dies made on two different nodes (5 nm for CPU cores; 6 nm for other componentry). It features a very healthy 28 PCIe 5 lanes for connecting graphics cards and SSDs as fast as 15.75 GB/s. The RAM controller is limited to DDR5-5200 or slower; there is no NPU and no Thunderbolt support, the product page on amd.com indicates, but the clock multiplier is unlocked for easy overclocking.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system featuring the 8840HX as of April 2025, we can take the 7845HX's multi-thread Cinebench scores and lower them by a percent or two. If we do that, the 8840HX emerges as a Core i7-14650HX and Core i7-14700HX-beating CPU which is fast enough for any 2025 or 2026 game.

Power consumption

Much like the 7845HX, the 8840HX has a base TDP (long-term power limit) of 55 watts that can officially be jacked up to as high as 75 watts. In fact, Alienware allows the 7845HX to consume well over 100 watts in its 2023 Alienware m16 (the only 7845HX system Notebookcheck has tested). Either way, to dissipate 50+ watts, at least one high-RPM fan is needed.

ModelIntel Core i7-14650HXAMD Ryzen 9 8940HXAMD Ryzen 7 8840HX
CodenameRaptor Lake-HX RefreshDragon Range refresh (Zen 4)Dragon Range refresh (Zen 4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-HXAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X)
Series: Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X) Dragon Range refresh (Zen 4)
Intel Core i9-14900HX1.6 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700HX3.9 - 5.5 GHz20 / 28 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14650HX « 1.6 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500HX1.8 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14450HX1.8 - 4.8 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX « 2.4 - 5.3 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX3.6 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX2.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX2.4 - 5.3 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HX « 2.9 - 5.1 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX3.6 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
Clock1600 - 5200 MHz2400 - 5300 MHz2900 - 5100 MHz
L2 Cache24 MB16 MB12 MB
L3 Cache30 MB64 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 24
8 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 32
16 x 5.3 GHz AMD Zen 4
12 / 24
12 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP55 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2157 Watt
Technology10 nmCCD = 5nm, I/O = 6 nmCCD = 5nm, I/O = 6 nm
Die Size257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1964FL1FL1
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1600 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comamd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache1 MB768 KB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14650HX
42.4 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 116     avg: 116.5     median: 116.5 (65%)     max: 117 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 835     avg: 1035     median: 1035 (19%)     max: 1235 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 16453     avg: 20454     median: 20454 (19%)     max: 24455 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1963     avg: 1969     median: 1969 (83%)     max: 1975 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 754     avg: 758     median: 758 (83%)     max: 762 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6236     avg: 7793     median: 7792.5 (19%)     max: 9349 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3142     avg: 3471     median: 3470.5 (22%)     max: 3799 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 284     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (80%)     max: 287 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
43.9 Points (57%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (81%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
15819 Points (96%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
112749 Points (82%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
642 s (8%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
38336 Points (61%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 68711     avg: 81199     median: 81198.5 (47%)     max: 93686 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6364     avg: 6530     median: 6529.5 (77%)     max: 6695 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.6     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (34%)     max: 25.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (56%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.7 GB/s (64%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
19.8 GB/s (52%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 247     avg: 307     median: 307 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 141     avg: 173.5     median: 173.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4195     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4244 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.4 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
14.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
337.3 s (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20090     avg: 22127     median: 22126.5 (54%)     max: 24163 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17628 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 28404     avg: 30196     median: 30196 (54%)     max: 31988 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12741     avg: 14026     median: 14026 (59%)     max: 15311 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2744     avg: 2753     median: 2752.5 (69%)     max: 2761 Points
2767 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12892     avg: 14451     median: 14451 (56%)     max: 16010 Points
16188 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1933     avg: 1937     median: 1936.5 (76%)     max: 1940 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12584     avg: 14697     median: 14697 (26%)     max: 16810 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 483     avg: 484.5     median: 484.5 (1%)     max: 486 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
98007 Points (74%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 271     avg: 277     median: 277 (76%)     max: 283 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 289     avg: 300     median: 300 (54%)     max: 311 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1965     avg: 2029     median: 2028.5 (76%)     max: 2092 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 155.8     avg: 157.6     median: 157.6 (27%)     max: 159.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
197 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 23.6     median: 23.6 (16%)     max: 24.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 15     avg: 16.3     median: 16.3 (18%)     max: 17.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
19.3 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14650HX → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 01. 16:26:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17170 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19595 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 19596 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751379993s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Jul 2025 05:20:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17170 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 17170 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19595 +0.001s ... 0.019s

#11 got single benchmarks 19595 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 19596 +0s ... 0.022s

#13 got single benchmarks 19596 +0s ... 0.022s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.042s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)