Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-12600K vs Intel Core i7-12650HX

Intel Core i5-12600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-12600K

The Intel Core i5-12600K is a mid-range CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 16 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 4.9 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.6 GHz. All cores can use 20 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.45 GHz.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost. Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

Performance

The average 12600K in our database is way ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900 and the Core i9-10900K, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very fast CPU that should have no trouble running triple-A games for at least a couple of years.

Power consumption

This Core i5 series chip has a Base power consumption of 125 W, with its maximum Intel-recommended Turbo power consumption sitting at 150 W.

The i5-12600K is built with Intel's fourth generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 for lower-than-average, as of mid 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Core i7-12650HX

► remove from comparison Intel i7-12650HX

The Intel Core i7-12650HX is a high-end mobile CPU for laptops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was announced in mid 2022 and offers 6 of the 8 performance cores (P-cores, Golden Cove architecture) and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The P-cores support Hyper-Threading leading to 20 supported threads when combined with the E-cores. The clock rate ranges from 2.0 to 4.7 GHz on the performance cluster and 1.5 to 3.3 GHz on the efficiency cluster. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare with the Core i7-6920HQ). All cores can use up to 25 MB L3 cache. The CPU offers an open multiplicator and therefore the possibility to overclock the CPU cores. Compared to the similar i7-12850HX, the 12800HX does not offer vPro or ECC memory support.

Performance

Due to the similar specs, the performance of the 12650HX should be similar to the Core i7-12700H (14 cores, max 4,7 GHz, 45 W TDP). Thanks to the higher TDP, the sustained performance could be better (if the cooling of the laptop is sufficient). 

Features

The integrated memory controller supports various memory types up to DDR5-4800 and DDR4-3200. The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficient cores for the best performance. For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (via AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC, and AV1 decode in hardware. The CPU supports 48 PCIe lanes consisting of 16 Gen5 (x16 or 2x8), 20 Gen4 and 12 Gen3.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and offers 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.45 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 55 W base power (157 W PL2). The SoC is manufactured on a 10nm process at Intel, which is known as Intel 7.

ModelIntel Core i5-12600KIntel Core i7-12650HX
CodenameAlder LakeAlder Lake-HX
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-SIntel Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake-HX
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 compare2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K « 2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12950HX compare1.7 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900HX compare1.7 - 5 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12850HX compare1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 24 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12800HX compare1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 24 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12650HX « 1.5 - 4.7 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600HX compare1.8 - 4.6 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12450HX compare1.8 - 4.4 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4900 MHz1500 - 4700 MHz
L2 Cache9.5 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache20 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1614 / 20
TDP125 Watt55 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA1700BGA1964
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, vPro Enterp., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1450 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 ( - 1450 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$289 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache1.2 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-12600K
40 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17491 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1907 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
734 Points (80%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6692 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2555 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
275 Points (76%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (79%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9381 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
55462 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
89478 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15180 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
202.7 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6239 Points (10%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
64260 MIPS (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5944 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
148 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
333.5 fps (9%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.1 fps (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.2 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.8 GB/s (33%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
189.5 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15722 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
363.2 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
85458 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
25017 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
78037 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
79174 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77742 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20161 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
29671 Points (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13869 Points (58%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2629 Points (64%)
min: 2152     avg: 2401     median: 2400.5 (58%)     max: 2649 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12969 Points (50%)
min: 8389     avg: 9377     median: 9376.5 (36%)     max: 10364 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1904 Points (72%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
12797 Points (23%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1821 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12746 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8223 Points (82%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
46557 Points (46%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
293 Points (53%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1637 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
256.5 Watt (44%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
205.9 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
12.4 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-12600K → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-12650HX → 82% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 07. 17:13:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13886 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14409 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759849980s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13886 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 13886 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14409 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 14409 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.04s

#13 return log +0.008s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)