Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-7130U vs AMD A10-9600P

Intel Core i3-7130U

► remove from comparison Intel i3-7130U

The Intel Core i3-7130U is a dual-core processor of the Kaby-Lake architecture. It offers two CPU cores clocked at 2.7 GHz (without Turbo Boost) and integrates HyperThreading to work with up to 4 threads at once. The architectural differences are rather small compared to the Skylake generation, therefore the performance per MHz should be very similar. The SoC includes a dual channel DDR4 memory controller and Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics adapter (clocked at 300 MHz to 1,000 MHz). It is manufactured on improved 14 nm Intel process with FinFETs.

Performance

The average 7130U in our database only just matches the Core i5-4310U, a dual-core CPU of similar energy efficiency that launched in 2014, in multi-thread performance. While not as horribly slow as most N-class Intel chips, this Core i3 is unlikely to make a power user happy.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your system is, and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 15 W. Laptop makers are allowed to significantly reduce that value (7.5 W being the lower limit) resulting in lower clock speeds and lower performance.

Last but not the least, the i3-7130U is manufactured on one of the old 14 nm Intel processes for subpar, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD A10-9600P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-9600P

The AMD A10-9600P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

ModelIntel Core i3-7130UAMD A10-9600P
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameKaby Lake-UBristol Ridge
Clock2700 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm28 nm
max. Temp.100 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1356
FeaturesDDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2133 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SGXDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 620 (300 - 1000 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comproducts.amd.com
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-9830P compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B compare3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P compare2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Transistors3100 Million
Die Size250 mm2

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
284 Points (2%)
min: 195     avg: 211     median: 216 (1%)     max: 217 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
111 Points (33%)
min: 70     avg: 74.8     median: 76 (23%)     max: 77 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.1 Points (4%)
min: 2.59     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (3%)     max: 2.6 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.3 Points (32%)
min: 0.87     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (22%)     max: 0.9 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4338 Points (26%)
min: 2340     avg: 2439     median: 2447 (15%)     max: 2520 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
9828 Points (7%)
min: 5913     avg: 6467     median: 6508 (5%)     max: 6939 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
568 s (7%)
534 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
18 s (4%)
15.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
2250 Points (4%)
1526 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
19 fps (7%)
16.3 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100.2 fps (23%)
85.4 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.3 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
1.7 GB/s (4%)
1.5 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3823 Points (8%)
min: 2969     avg: 3224     median: 3287 (7%)     max: 3352 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14.1 s (3%)
18.7 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
47.1 s (2%)
41.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
744 s (3%)
942 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 7115     avg: 7516     median: 7515.5 (7%)     max: 7916 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
3932 Points (11%)
min: 2246     avg: 2418     median: 2387 (6%)     max: 2634 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 21570     avg: 23140     median: 23093 (19%)     max: 24803 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 18940     avg: 21504     median: 21065.5 (17%)     max: 24944 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
36137 Points (30%)
min: 22601     avg: 25235     median: 26061 (22%)     max: 26217 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
3090 Points (8%)
min: 1722     avg: 2000     median: 2031.5 (5%)     max: 2214 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
4360 Points (8%)
min: 2455     avg: 2912     median: 2981 (5%)     max: 3229 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1045 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3497 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6792 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3473 Points (47%)
2047 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6782 Points (17%)
4711 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
6047 Points (11%)
min: 5252     avg: 5386     median: 5423 (10%)     max: 5445 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
2829 Points (55%)
min: 2000     avg: 2064     median: 2074 (41%)     max: 2109 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6279 Points (10%)
5702 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2972 Points (45%)
2237 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
8776 Points (71%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7335 Points (67%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
6043 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5967 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6548 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1682 ms (2%)
min: 2098     avg: 2251     median: 2328 (3%)     max: 2328 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
117.7 ms (1%)
min: 133.3     avg: 138.2     median: 133.3 (1%)     max: 148.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
21368 Points (19%)
min: 18921     avg: 19501     median: 19791 (18%)     max: 19791 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-7130U → 100% n=31

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-9600P → 84% n=31

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 21:01:37

#0 checking url part for id 9178 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8094 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9178 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#7 got single benchmarks 9178 +0.017s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8094 +0.003s ... 0.054s

#9 got single benchmarks 8094 +0.021s ... 0.075s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.235s ... 0.311s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.336s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)