Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i3-10100F vs Intel Core i9-12900

Intel Core i3-10100F

► remove from comparison Intel i3-10100F

The Intel Core i3-10100F is an entry level quad-core processor for desktop PCs based on the Comet Lake-S architecture. It offers four cores clocked at 3.6 - 4.3 GHz with HyperThreading / SMT support (8 threads). The CPU is still manufactured on 14nm++ and does not feature an integrated graphics card. Compared to the older Coffee Lake Core i3-9100F, the i3-10100F offers a 100 MHz higher Boost speed, HyperThreading and support for faster DDR4 memory (2666 MHz).

Performance

While we have not tested a single system powered by the 10100F as of August 2023, it's reasonable to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i5-10200H.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor won't need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases.

Intel Core i9-12900

► remove from comparison  i9-12900

The Intel Core i9-12900 is a high end CPU for desktops based on the Alder Lake architecture. It was first announced in November 2021 and offers 8 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores. The performance cores (P-cores) support HyperThreading, leading to 24 Threads that can be processed at once. The performance cores can clock with up to 5.1 GHz, the efficiency cores can clock with up to 3.8 GHz. All cores can use 30 MB Smart Cache. The integrated memory controller supports up to 128 GB DDR5 with 4800 MT/s (dual channel).

The Thread Director (in hardware) can support the operating system to decide which thread to use on the performance or efficiency cores for the best performance.

For AI tasks, the CPU also integrates GNA 3.0 and DL Boost (most likely only using AVX2). Quick Sync in version 8 is the same as in the Rocket Lake CPUs and supports MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 decode, JPEG, VP8 decode, VP9, HEVC and AV1 decode in hardware.

The integrated graphics card is based on the Xe-architecture and called Intel UHD Graphics 770. It clocks between 300 and 1.55 GHz.

The CPU is rated at 65 W base power and 202 Watt maximum Turbo power. It is manufactured in 10nm, called Intel 7, process at Intel.

ModelIntel Core i3-10100FIntel Core i9-12900
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake
SeriesIntel Comet Lake Alder Lake-S
Series: Alder Lake-S Alder Lake
Intel Core i9-10900K compare3.7 - 5.3 GHz10 / 20 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700K compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10700 compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10600K compare4.1 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400F compare2.9 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i3-10100F « 3.6 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900K compare3.2 - 5.2 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i9-12900 « 2.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 24 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700K compare2.7 - 5 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i7-12700 compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz12 / 20 cores25 MB L3
Intel Core i5-12600K compare2.8 - 4.9 GHz10 / 16 cores20 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4300 MHz2400 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB1.4 MB
L2 Cache1 MB14 MB
L3 Cache6 MB20 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 816 / 24
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
Die Size126 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketLGA1200LGA 1700
FeaturesDDR4-2666 RAM, PCIe 3, 8 GT/s bus, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3Intel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
Architecturex86x86
$122 U.S.$489 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900
39.8 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18628 Points (17%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1825 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
703 Points (77%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7179 Points (18%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3299 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
262 Points (73%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
39 Points (50%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (75%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8949 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
68729 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
107565 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14610 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
211.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10739 Points (17%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
50152 MIPS (29%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5979 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
147.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
310 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.4 fps (25%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.9 GB/s (56%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3.4 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.2 GB/s (45%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
262.7 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17464 Points (37%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
78877 Points (61%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
24314 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74061 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
73871 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19775 Points (50%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
35153 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
15095 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1495 Points (36%)
2500 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
5069 Points (20%)
13100 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1072 Points (41%)
1656 Points (63%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
3650 Points (7%)
8924 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1638 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8845 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6991 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36310 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
602 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
269 Points (48%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1785 Points (67%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
151 Watt (26%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
206 Watt (38%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.7 Watt (39%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
16 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-10100F → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900 → 206% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 01. 20:50:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12774 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14150 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759344647s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 Oct 2025 05:17:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12774 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 12774 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14150 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 14150 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.039s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)