Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.45)
Average of 3 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S
Source: GSM Arena
We don't see any particular reason to consider this model over the other two. The cheaper Redmi Note 10 is better value for money overall and the Redmi Note 10 Pro offers better features and performance for slightly more money. In that sense, the Redmi Note 10S exists merely to create a decoy effect because there are very few reasons to consider it over the other two. It's a cool marketing trick but hopefully, consumers will be able to see through it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/17/2021
Source: The Indian Express
Redmi Note 10S strikes most boxes when it comes to making a good all-around performing phone. However, its biggest problem is its pricing. Starting at Rs 14,999, the Redmi Note 10S would have covered the gap between the Redmi Note 10 and Note 10 Pro well. However, with the recent price drop for the Redmi Note 10 Pro which now starts at Rs 15,999, the Note 10S almost looks like an unnecessary addition to the series.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets
Apart from the camera, the other big change in the Note 10S is the processor. This smartphone is powered by the MediaTek Helio G95 SoC. The Redmi Note 10 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SoC. It'll be interesting to see the kind of performance lead the Redmi Note 10S has over the Redmi Note 10. My review unit was the top-spec variant with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of storage.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/13/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S Review (full in-depth review) of the 6.4" AMOLED Helio G95 powered Note 10. With 6GB of RAM and 64GB of UFS 2.2 storage, 5000mah battery, 64MP main camera, and 33W charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/26/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S unboxing Vs Redmi Note 10 5G unboxing & comparison. Hands-On first look with a camera comparison.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/24/2021
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 83% display: 83% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→EN
Positive: Attractive price; nice display; large battery capacity. Negative: Average performance; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/06/2021
Source: FPT shop VN→EN
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; high performance; decent processor; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/20/2021
ARM Mali-G76 MP4: Integrated graphics card based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. Uses 4 of the 20 possible clusters and according to ARM offers twice the performance per cluster than the old Mali-G72.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
Helio G95: ARM based octa-core SoC with 2x big ARM Cortex-A76 cores and 6x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores. All clocked up to 2.05 GHz. Integrates a Cat-12 LTE Modem (4G) and a ARM Mali-G76 graphics card clocked at 900 MHz (+100 MHz versus the identical G90T).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
Xiaomi Tech was founded as a Chinese smartphone producer in 2010 and soon reached high market shares in its home market. Although Xiaomi is not one of the Top 5 smartphone manufacturers worldwide in 2016, it is nevertheless one of the big global players in this market segment.
Since 2015 there are many reviews. The ratings have been above average since 2016.
83.33%: This rating should be considered to be average. This is because the proportion of notebooks which have a higher rating is approximately equal to the proportion which have a lower rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.