Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 365

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra X7 358H

The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is a high-end 16-core SoC from the Panther Lake family for notebooks and the second-fastest model with the fast 12-core iGPU.

The 358H integrates a compute tile that is manufactured by Intel in the new 18A process. This includes 4 large Cougar Cove P-Cores with up to 1.9 - 4.8 GHz, 8 Darkmont E-Cores with 1.5 - 3.7 GHz and another 4 small Darkmont LP (Low Power) E-Cores with 1.5 - 3.3 GHz. Furthermore, the new NPU 5 with 50 TOPS INT 8 and an IPU 7.5 image processor are installed. The integrated memory controller supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5-9600.

The GPU tile contains a fast iGPU with 12 Xe3 cores and ray tracing support and is manufactured by TSMC using the N3E process.

The third chiplet integrates the platform controller with 12 PCIe lanes, 4x Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 7 (R2) and Bluetooth Core 6.0. The platform controller is also manufactured by TSMC.

The power consumption is specified from 15 W (minimum assured power) over 25 Watt (processor base power PL1) up to 80 W (maximum Turbo power).

Intel Core Ultra 7 365

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 365

The Intel Core Ultra 5 365 is a mid-range 8-core (4+4) SoC from the Panther Lake family for notebooks. Furthermore the chip offers support for vPro management features (vPro eligibility).

It integrates a compute tile manufactured by Intel in the new 18A process with 4 large Cougar Cove P cores and up to 2.4 - 4.8 GHz and 4 Darkmont LP (Low Power) E cores with 1.8 - 3.6. Furthermore, the new NPU 5 with 50 TOPS INT 8 and an IPU 7.5 image processor are installed. The integrated memory controller supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5X-7467 or 128 GB DDR5-6400.

The GPU tile contains a fast iGPU with 4 Xe3 cores and ray tracing support and is manufactured by Intel in the Intel 3 process.

The third chiplet integrates the platform controller with 12 PCIe lanes, 4x Thunderbolt 4, Wi-Fi 7 (R2) and Bluetooth Core 6.0. The platform controller is also manufactured at TSMC.

The power consumption is specified from 15 W (minimum assured power) over 25 Watt (processor base power PL1) up to 55 W (maximum Turbo power).

show full text
ModelIntel Core Ultra X7 358HIntel Core Ultra 7 365
CodenamePanther LakePanther Lake
SeriesIntel Panther LakeIntel Panther Lake
Series: Panther Lake Panther Lake
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H compare1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H compare1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H compare1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H « 1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 355 compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 3651.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 335 compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 325 compare1.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 322 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Intel Core Ultra 5 332 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H compare1.6 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 368H compare1.6 - 5 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H compare1.6 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H1.5 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 338H compare1.5 - 4.7 GHz12 / 12 cores
Intel Core Ultra 7 366H compare1.6 - 4.8 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 355 compare1.7 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 336H compare1.5 - 4.6 GHz12 / 12 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 365 « 1.8 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 335 compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 325 compare1.6 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 322 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Intel Core Ultra 5 332 compare1.9 - 4.4 GHz6 / 6 cores
Clock1500 - 4800 MHz1800 - 4800 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core
4 x 3.3 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core		8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt55 Watt
Technology2 nm1.8 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA2540FCBGA2540
iGPUIntel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ( - 2500 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.com
L1 Cache2.3 MB
L2 Cache16 MB
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT8

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra X7 358H
42.8 pt (71%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core i9-12900HX
42 -2%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42 -2%
Intel Core 7 250H
42.2 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
42.2 -1%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
42.3 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H
42.6 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 356H
42.7 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
42.8 0%
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
42.8
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.2 1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 1%
Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
43.9 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 3%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
44.2 3%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 4%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
45 5%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 5%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
49.7 16%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 40%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.4     avg: 124.4     median: 124.2 (62%)     max: 125.5 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 974     avg: 1032     median: 996 (19%)     max: 1125 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17457     avg: 18743     median: 18932 (18%)     max: 19841 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2079     avg: 2083     median: 2085 (85%)     max: 2086 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 786     avg: 789     median: 788 (86%)     max: 792 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6848     avg: 7340     median: 7437 (18%)     max: 7736 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3039     avg: 3088     median: 3090 (20%)     max: 3135 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 292     avg: 304.3     median: 309 (86%)     max: 312 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 58746     avg: 63845     median: 64255 (37%)     max: 68533 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6170     avg: 6340     median: 6323 (75%)     max: 6526 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.5     avg: 21.1     median: 20.7 (36%)     max: 23.1 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 288     avg: 337.3     median: 335 (4%)     max: 389 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 175     avg: 196.3     median: 196 (1%)     max: 218 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4127     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4279 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 19594     avg: 21244     median: 21977 (54%)     max: 22161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 18226     avg: 18839     median: 18839 (48%)     max: 19452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 25143     avg: 26918     median: 27796 (50%)     max: 27815 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 12525     avg: 13268     median: 12693 (54%)     max: 14585 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2836     avg: 2889     median: 2895.5 (67%)     max: 2927 Points
2737 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 16519     avg: 16826     median: 16831.5 (57%)     max: 17121 Points
10960 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2116     avg: 2125     median: 2117 (71%)     max: 2142 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16836     avg: 16931     median: 16929 (30%)     max: 17028 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 445     avg: 447     median: 447 (1%)     max: 449 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
116743 Points (76%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 279     avg: 295.3     median: 302 (75%)     max: 305 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 304     avg: 321     median: 321 (54%)     max: 338 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1884     avg: 1974     median: 1955 (68%)     max: 2082 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 56.8     avg: 60.1     median: 60.1 (10%)     max: 63.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 62.8     avg: 73.5     median: 63.9 (12%)     max: 93.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.43     avg: 4.3     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 5.89 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.26     avg: 3.6     median: 3.7 (3%)     max: 3.81 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 33.4     avg: 43.4     median: 48.4 (36%)     max: 48.4 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H → 100% n=2

Intel Core Ultra 7 365 → 80% n=2

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 12. 13:20:12

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 20438 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 20450 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1773318012s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 10:47:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 20438 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 20438 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 20450 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 20450 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.033s

#13 return log +0.131s ... 0.164s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)