Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T760 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810

UNISOC Tangula T760

► remove from comparison  Tangula T760

The Unisoc T760 Tanggula (former Spreadtrum) is a mid range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates an octa-core CPU with two clusters. Four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2 GHz and four small ARM-Cortex-A55 cores at again up to 2 GHz for efficiency. The faster T770 SoC offers higher clocked A76 cores in comparison (up to 2.5 GHz for a single core).

One fast ARM Cortex-A76 clocked at up to 2.5 GHz, three more A76 performance cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster of four ARM-Cortex-A55 cores with up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4/4X with up to 2133 MHz (2x 16 Bit). The integrated ISP supports two main cameras and two subsidiary cameras (up to 108 MPix). The integrated graphics card is an ARM Mali-G57 MC4 (4 cores) at up to 780 MHz. Unisoc also specifies that the T770 offers hardware AI acceleration.

The chip is manufactured in the modern 6nm process.

MediaTek Dimensity 810

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 810

The Mediatek Dimensity 810 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2.4 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 2 core ARM Mali-G57 MC2 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller(up to 16 GB with 2133 MHz), a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

The integrated 5G modem supports dual-5G (Sub6) with up to 2.77 GBit/s download. 

The Dimensity 800 is manufactured in the modern 6nm process at TSMC and should be very power efficient.

ModelUNISOC Tangula T760MediaTek Dimensity 810
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 8102 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
» MediaTek Dimensity 8102 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7602 - 2 GHz8 / 83 MB Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock2000 - 2000 MHz2000 - 2400 MHz
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm6 nm
FeaturesISP (2 main + 2 subsidiary, 108M 4-in-1, 64M ZSL)2x ARM Cortex-A76 (2.4 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G57 MP2, Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, LPDDR4x Support; 
SA & NSA modes; SA Option2, NSA Option3 / 3a / 3x, NR TDD Band, NR FDD Band, DSS, NR DL 2CC, 120 MHz bandwidth, 256QAM NR UL 2CC,
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP4 ( - 650 MHz)ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ( - 1068 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMediatek Dimensity 810

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 810
37 pt (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
3804 Points (48%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
3801 Points (55%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
541 Points (26%)
598 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2155 Points (7%)
1809 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
605 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1788 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2846 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7135 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2411 Points (37%)
2785 Points (43%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7951 Points (19%)
6800 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6462 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2474 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4090 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
4643 Points (42%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12871 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
6041 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7956 Points (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2410 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
619 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19010 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
62 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
59948 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
71022 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
72423 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
97103 Points (35%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
300496 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
21052 Points (57%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
9402 Points (51%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8824 Points (58%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
2.9 Watt (13%)
012345Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
1.2 Watt (4%)
00.10.20.30.30.40.50.60.70.80.9111.11.21.31.41.51.61.7Tooltip

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 810 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 06. 22:02:54

#0 checking url part for id 14027 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14124 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.037s ... 0.043s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.045s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.045s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 14027 +0s ... 0.045s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#19 got single benchmarks 14027 +0.005s ... 0.051s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.052s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 14124 +0s ... 0.054s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#26 got single benchmarks 14124 +0.008s ... 0.062s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.063s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.064s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.066s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.066s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.01s ... 0.082s

#66 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.088s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#68 return log +0.004s ... 0.092s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)