Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC Tangula T700 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison  Tangula T700

The Unisoc Tangula T700 (former Spreadtrum) is an entry level octa core SoC with two fast ARM Cortex A75 cores at up to 1.8 GHz and six power efficient ARM Cortex A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. The SoC furthermore includes a LTE modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM), an ARM Mali G52MP2 GPU and a tri core ISP. Furthermore, the T700 supports 90 Hz displays.

The chip is manufactured at TSMC in 12nm FinFET.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

ModelUNISOC Tangula T700Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Series Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1800 - 1800 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm11 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPAdreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISP
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2Qualcomm Adreno 610
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
0.5 pt (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 17865     avg: 20749     median: 20024 (17%)     max: 24652 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (11%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (15%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (2%)     max: 1421 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (1%)     max: 315 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1536 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (6%)     max: 5663 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 665 +
2272 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 665 +
2767 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 665 +
10733 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 665 +
4516 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
6117 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
min: 4434     avg: 4783     median: 4562 (5%)     max: 6719 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (9%)
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (8%)     max: 9671 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (14%)
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (11%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
108166 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 665 +
10308 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 665 +
35460 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
31064 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
63801 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
140633 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
186885 Points (18%)
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
2078 Points (0%)
8324%
SD 665 +
172978 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (16%)
7618 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (40%)     max: 8746 Points
6505 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (23%)     max: 11549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
13.4 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
151 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
11.3 MB/s (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
256 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 7437     avg: 8163     median: 8085 (40%)     max: 9051 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt
100%
1 SD 665 +
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 665 +
1.2 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 543% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 21. 23:29:03

#0 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.063s ... 0.064s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.064s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.015s ... 0.079s

#7 got single benchmarks 13247 +0.012s ... 0.09s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.012s ... 0.102s

#9 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.041s ... 0.143s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.143s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.164s ... 0.307s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.332s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)