Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Intel Core 2 Duo T5750

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5300

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5750Intel Core 2 Duo T5300Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1730 MHz2000 MHz
FSB667533800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C85 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Steepstep, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5750Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T5750 +
1.1 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (16%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (4%)     max: 3835 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5750 +
41.3 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T5750 +
min: 1714     avg: 1732     median: 1738 (4%)     max: 1745 Points
94%
1 T5800 +
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5750 +
28 s (6%)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T5300 +
84 s (4%)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5750 +
1523 s (7%)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5750 +
min: 3375     avg: 3413     median: 3412.5 (3%)     max: 3450 Points
104%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.20
log 02. 06:18:42

#0 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 327 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:15:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#25 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0s ... 0.007s

#28 got single benchmarks 407 +0.015s ... 0.022s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 327 +0s ... 0.022s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#31 got single benchmarks 327 +0.008s ... 0.03s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#33 got single benchmarks 438 +0.018s ... 0.049s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#56 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.056s

#57 return log +0s ... 0.056s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)