The Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. Compared to the C2D T5670, the T5600 features Virtualization functions VT-x, but lacks Idle Stats (according to the Intel HP).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 is a mobile dual core processor based on the Merom core. In 2006, the T7400 was a mid-range to high-end laptop processor. In 2010, the performance is only in the entry level segment. Later announced Penryn based Core 2 Duo processors are manufactured in 40nm and feature a higher speed per clock rate. Therefore, the Core 2 Duo P7450 is a bit faster and also more power efficient.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 128%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 → 108%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 26. 06:54:54
#0 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 164 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.021s ... 0.022s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0.002s ... 0.024s
#8 got single benchmarks 171 +0.032s ... 0.056s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.002s ... 0.057s
#10 got single benchmarks 339 +0.011s ... 0.068s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 164 +0.002s ... 0.07s
#12 got single benchmarks 164 +0.027s ... 0.097s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.068s ... 0.165s