Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 888+ 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ (Plus) 5G Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in mid 2021 and manufactured in 5 nm at Samsung. 

Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X1 architecture clocked at up to 3 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the A78 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 6e modem, a Hexagon 780 DSP (up to 26 TOPS of AI performance) and a Spectra 580 ISP. The integrated memory controller now supports faster LPDDR5 memory with up to 3,200 MHz. 5G is now included in the chip with the Snapdragon X60 modem.

Compared to the older Snapdragon 888, the 888+ offers a slightly higher clocked prime core (+160 MHz) and a 23% faster Hexagon 790 DSP. Therefore, it is now the fastest Android SoC (at the time of announcement), but still slightly slower (CPU and GPU) than the Apple A14 and A15 Bionic SoCs.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 765G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (SD765G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core, called Kryo 475) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster contains two ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.4 GHz (prime core) and 2.2 GHz (gold core) and a power efficiency cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Compared to the normal Snapdragon 765, the 765G is optimized for gaming. This means the graphics card is higher clocked and the chip also supports additional software features (Snapdragon Elite Gaming like Game Smoother, Game Fast Loader and Game Network Latency Manager).

The processor performance is quite comparable to the old Snapdragon 730G. Only the single core performance can be slightly better, thanks to the higher clocked prime core (+200 MHz = 9% higher).

The chip is one of the first SoCs that integrate a 5G modem. It is called Snapdragon X52 and supports speeds of up to 3.7 / 1.6 Mbps (down- and upload) and mmWave and Sub-6.

The integrated Adreno 620 is also higher clocked compared to the one in the normal 765 and should result in 10% higher performance (according to QC).

The integrated AI engine uses the GPU, CPU and dedicated cores to reach a theoretical maximum performance of 5.5 TOPS.

The processor is manufactured in the modern and energy efficient 7nm EUV process at Samsung. 

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 765G
CodenameCortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G « 1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G « 1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Clock1800 - 3000 MHz1800 - 2400 MHz
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X1
3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8 / 8
TDP5 Watt
Technology5 nm7 nm
FeaturesAdreno 660 GPU, Spectra 580 ISP, Hexagon 780, X60 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi, LPDDR5-6400 (3200 MHz) Memory Controller (64 Bit)Adreno 620 GPU, X52 5G/LTE Modem, Hexagon 696 DSP, Specra 355 ISP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 660Qualcomm Adreno 620
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 888+ 5G
1.3 pt (100%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 765G
0.6 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4387     avg: 4898     median: 4952 (47%)     max: 5260 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4365     avg: 4994     median: 5260 (60%)     max: 5293 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1076     avg: 1143     median: 1157 (45%)     max: 1170 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3286     avg: 3572     median: 3628.5 (7%)     max: 3675 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1164 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3699 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4754     avg: 4973     median: 4973 (50%)     max: 5192 Points
min: 2689     avg: 2811     median: 2863 (29%)     max: 2882 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12433     avg: 13553     median: 13552.5 (14%)     max: 14672 Points
min: 6213     avg: 7214     median: 7665 (8%)     max: 7765 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5255 Points (58%)
3072 Points (34%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13602 Points (18%)
7661 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
11320 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3977 Points (60%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3422 Points (18%)
3754 Points (20%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5554 Points (38%)
3987 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
18052 Points (35%)
13267 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8716 Points (18%)
6137 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
10821 Points (28%)
7961 Points (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1117.9     avg: 1267     median: 1253.5 (1%)     max: 1443 ms
min: 2359     avg: 3721     median: 2733.5 (3%)     max: 15230 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
342.5 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 28695     avg: 38237     median: 37604 (28%)     max: 49046 Points
min: 3592     avg: 16671     median: 18551 (14%)     max: 19143 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
104 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 120     avg: 144     median: 147 (26%)     max: 165 Points
min: 20     avg: 71.5     median: 76 (14%)     max: 101 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 108609     avg: 111028     median: 111506 (93%)     max: 112968 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 97862     avg: 106258     median: 102389 (83%)     max: 118523 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 297329     avg: 308231     median: 306570 (56%)     max: 320795 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 181327     avg: 186005     median: 184740 (67%)     max: 191947 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 695964     avg: 711522     median: 712952 (69%)     max: 725649 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 794271     avg: 813105     median: 815115 (40%)     max: 829929 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 196860     avg: 203592     median: 205863 (51%)     max: 208053 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4771 Points (1%)
208510 Points (27%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 28905     avg: 32530     median: 31947 (14%)     max: 36738 Points
18532 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 12136     avg: 15268     median: 15403 (56%)     max: 18567 Points
9189 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
12692 Points (83%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 765G +
min: 3822     avg: 8112     median: 4325 (23%)     max: 18932 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 765G +
min: 4439     avg: 13287     median: 15644 (33%)     max: 19273 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 828     avg: 872     median: 872 (33%)     max: 916 Points
437 Points (16%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.68     avg: 5.3     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 6.41 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.943     avg: 1.1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.244 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G → 225% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 07. 22:20:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13833 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11878 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1754598048s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 07 Aug 2025 05:18:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13833 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 13833 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11878 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 11878 +0.002s ... 0.009s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.015s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.02s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.028s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.028s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)