Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G vs Qualcomm QCM6490

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 695 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (SD695) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 660 called cores (64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of two cores with up to 2.2 GHz based on the ARM Cortex-A78 design. And a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.7 GHz based on much smaller ARM Cortex-A55 cores. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a lower mid range Adreno 619 GPU, a X51 5G radio (up to 2.5 Gbits download, no mmWave), a 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5, 8x8 sounding, Dual Band, 2x2), a Bluetooth 5.2 radio, satellite positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou and Galileo) and a video engine (support for H.265, H.264, VP8 and VP9).

Compared to the previous SD690, the SD695 is now manufactured in 6nm (instead of 8nm) and offers a higher clocked performance cluster. However, the SD695 only supports Wi-Fi 5 instead of Wi-Fi 6 of the SD690.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 780G 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G (SM7350-AB Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into three clusters. A fast prime core for single thread performance based on the ARM Cortex-A78 architecture with up to 2.4 GHz. Three additional A78 based performance cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster with four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.9 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Thanks to the new Cortex-A78 cores, the CPU performance increases by up to 40% compared to the old Snapdragon 768G according to Qualcomm. In our benchmarks, the 780G is able to reach the performance of the old high end chip Kirin 990. The multi-thread performance is similar to the old Snapdragon 865+ in the Galaxy Z Fold2, but using a single core, the 780G is trailing behind.

The integrated X53 5G modem supports up to 3.3 Gbps with sub 6Ghz. The FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi modem supports the current Wi-Fi 6e standard with 6GHz.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 642 offers a 50% higher performance compared to the old Adreno 620 in the predecessor. This is partly thanks to the fast memory controller with LPDDR4X-4200 support.

The integrated 6th gen AI engine called Hexagon 770 offers a 2x improvement and up to 12 TOPS of performance. The Spectra 570 ISP (image signal processor) supports up to three cameras. The satellite system supports all major standards like Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS and GPS.

The G specifies an optimized SoC for gaming and e.g. Qualcomm offers updates for the graphics driver.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5 nm process at Samsung (5LPE with EUV).

Qualcomm QCM6490

► remove from comparison Qualcomm QCM6490

The Qualcomm QCM6490 is an upper mid-range SoC and is based on the Snapdragon 778G, but this variant is an extended-life chipset. The QCM6490 is being used for the first time in the Android smartphone Fairphone 5, but has actually been designed for corporate use and IoT applications.

The Kyro 670 CPU consists of a total of eight cores, which are divided into three clusters. The first cluster consists of just one high-performance core (Kyro Gold Plus, Cortex-A78), which operates at up to 2.71 GHz. The second cluster contains three further Cortex-A78 cores (Kyro Gold), each clocking at up to 2.40 GHz. The remaining four power-saving cores (Kyro Silver, Cortex-A55) are located in the last cluster and operate at up to 1.96 GHz. For the graphics calculations, an Adreno 643 with 812 MHz is integrated.

The QCM6490 SoC has an integrated 5G modem that supports both 5G-Sub6 and 5G-mmWave. In theory, this enables data rates of up to 3.7 Gbit/s downlink and 2.5 Gbit/s upload. Wi-Fi 6E is also on board, which supports the 6 GHz band.

The SoC is manufactured using the 6 nm process.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 695 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5GQualcomm QCM6490
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Clock1700 - 2200 MHz1900 - 2400 MHz1960 - 2710 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm5 nm6 nm
FeaturesAdreno 619 GPU, X51 5G Modem, Hexagon 692 DSP, Spectra 355L ISP, FastConnect 6200 (Wi-Fi 5)Adreno 642 GPU, X53 5G Modem, Hexagon 770 DSP, Specra 570 ISP, FasctConnect 6900 Wi-Fi 6EDual-Band GNSS, AI Engine (Gen. 6), Hexagon 770, Sensing Hub (Gen. 2), FastConnect 6900, Bluetooth 5.2, Spectra 570L ISP; LPDDR5 (3200 MHz) / LPDDR4x (2133 MHz)
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 619Qualcomm Adreno 642Qualcomm Adreno 643 (812 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G « 1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM64901.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM6490 « 1.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 780G 5G
min: 1.074     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (83%)     max: 1.3 pt
2354 Points (28%)
4960 Points (58%)
2567 Points (29%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 893     avg: 906     median: 905.5 (27%)     max: 919 Points
125%
1 QCM6490 +
1129 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 1993     avg: 2073     median: 2064 (8%)     max: 2189 Points
145%
1 QCM6490 +
2999 Points (12%)
809 Points (34%)
870 Points (37%)
2998 Points (5%)
2944 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3057     avg: 3136     median: 3084 (31%)     max: 3249 Points
3674 Points (37%)
3822 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6998     avg: 7607     median: 7355 (8%)     max: 8302 Points
11965 Points (13%)
11172 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3162 Points (43%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7773 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
6758 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2415 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2679 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3563 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17573 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7678 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9815 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1298.2     avg: 1769     median: 1913.1 (2%)     max: 2501.3 ms
1802 ms (2%)
1102 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 17849     avg: 24051     median: 22407 (20%)     max: 31647 Points
26943 Points (24%)
38966 Points (35%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 58     avg: 74.3     median: 66 (19%)     max: 111 Points
176%
1 QCM6490 +
116 Points (33%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 75     avg: 101     median: 95 (20%)     max: 156 Points
106 Points (22%)
151 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
75496 Points (63%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
78048 Points (63%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
158362 Points (29%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
156362 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
468196 Points (45%)
521880 Points (32%)
597212 Points (36%)
161037 Points (44%)
172629 Points (47%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4737 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 30.49     avg: 37.6     median: 38.9 (29%)     max: 41.9 MB/s
113%
1 QCM6490 +
43.8 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 312     avg: 356.9     median: 321.4 (10%)     max: 420 MB/s
222%
1 QCM6490 +
714 MB/s (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 18.22     avg: 24.5     median: 27.8 (34%)     max: 29 MB/s
24.8 MB/s (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 339.36     avg: 402.1     median: 399 (11%)     max: 462 MB/s
223%
1 QCM6490 +
889 MB/s (25%)
20384 Points (32%)
26398 Points (42%)
11218 Points (52%)
11866 Points (55%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6393 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
10689 Points (70%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
9712 Points (49%)
135%
1 QCM6490 +
794 Points (30%)
4.6 Watt (2%)
1.7 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G → 122% n=12

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm QCM6490 → 142% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 05. 19:04:57

#0 checking url part for id 14148 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13201 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15537 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14148 +0.003s ... 0.037s

#8 got single benchmarks 14148 +0.06s ... 0.097s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13201 +0.015s ... 0.112s

#10 got single benchmarks 13201 +0.01s ... 0.122s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 15537 +0.003s ... 0.125s

#12 got single benchmarks 15537 +0.007s ... 0.132s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.132s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.167s ... 0.299s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.315s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.315s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)