Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016

Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 632

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 (SD632) is a mid-range octa-core SoC with eight Kryo 250 cores (Cortex-A53 based) at up to 1.8 GHz, an Adreno 506 GPU, a LPDDR3 memory controller (dual channel) and a X9 LTE (Cat 12, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Furthermore, the chip supports 802.11abgn WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFet. Qualcomm states a 40% faster performance compared to the old Snapdragon 626.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 410 APQ8016

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 (APQ8016) is a ARM based mid-range SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in Dec. 2013 and was the first 64-Bit SoC by Qualcomm. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 (quad-core) processor cores, a Adreno 306 graphics card, a 64 Bit LPDDR2/3 memory controller and WLAN, Bluetooth, and UMTS/LTE radio. Compared to the MSM8916, the APQ8016 lacks the integrated cellular radio (3G, 4G, LTE) and is usually clocked lower (1.2 vs 1.4 GHz).

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 632Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 250Cortex-A53
Clock1800 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology14 nm28 nm
FeaturesAdreno 506 GPU, X9 LTE Modem, Hexagon 546 DSP, 2x ISP 14-BitAdreno 306 GPU, WLAN, Bluetooth, NFC, GPS/GLOSNASS/BeiDou, 32/64 Bit LPDDR2/3 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 506Qualcomm Adreno 306
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 632
0.4 pt (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 8548     avg: 8759     median: 8758.5 (7%)     max: 8969 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
8667 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15123     avg: 15916     median: 15948.5 (13%)     max: 16647 Points
min: 9168     avg: 9212     median: 9212 (8%)     max: 9256 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 2132     avg: 2202     median: 2206 (9%)     max: 2281 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2130     avg: 2200     median: 2174 (25%)     max: 2323 Points
724 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 632 +
271 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 632 +
1233 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 1194     avg: 1236     median: 1247 (12%)     max: 1256 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 4179     avg: 4497     median: 4515 (5%)     max: 4765 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 632 +
1256 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 632 +
4515 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1442     avg: 1459     median: 1443 (3%)     max: 1492 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 465     avg: 483.7     median: 482 (9%)     max: 504 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
0 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
0 MFLOPS (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4806     avg: 4899     median: 4895 (6%)     max: 5037 ms
min: 12953     avg: 13718     median: 13618.5 (16%)     max: 14680 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1414     avg: 1471     median: 1415 (16%)     max: 1584 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8185     avg: 8287     median: 8268.5 (7%)     max: 8420 Points
min: 2773     avg: 2935     median: 2968.5 (3%)     max: 3028 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 50     avg: 55.3     median: 58 (12%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
20887 Points (21%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 76724     avg: 83178     median: 84051.5 (29%)     max: 87883 Points
28399 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 6466     avg: 8367     median: 8156 (25%)     max: 10510 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 25769     avg: 29160     median: 29882 (37%)     max: 30294 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 13554     avg: 13851     median: 13921 (4%)     max: 13942 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 49427     avg: 52229     median: 52684 (32%)     max: 53683 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 97294     avg: 103607     median: 103114 (18%)     max: 108408 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 632 +
49912 Points (42%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 632 +
25162 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 632 +
15277 Points (3%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 632 +
59443 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 632 +
149794 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
100%
1 SD 632 +
1353 min (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 3078     avg: 3242     median: 3242 (17%)     max: 3406 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 4200     avg: 7719     median: 7719 (16%)     max: 11238 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 632 +
min: 5785     avg: 5942     median: 5921.5 (39%)     max: 6076 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6566     avg: 7099     median: 7152 (36%)     max: 7498 Points
min: 3803     avg: 4043     median: 4043 (20%)     max: 4283 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 → 51% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 22. 01:41:55

#0 checking url part for id 11121 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6808 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11121 +0.017s ... 0.043s

#7 got single benchmarks 11121 +0.021s ... 0.063s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6808 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#9 got single benchmarks 6808 +0.015s ... 0.082s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.077s ... 0.159s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.16s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.216s

#14 return log +0.035s ... 0.25s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)