Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 255 vs AMD Ryzen 7 H 255

AMD Ryzen 7 255

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 255 is a chip from the Hawk Point family. The chip is identical to the older Ryzen 7 8745H and has 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) that run at up to 4.95 GHz (+50 MHz compared to the 8745H), together with the still quite powerful Radeon 780M iGPU. An NPU for AI acceleration is not installed / activated.

Performance

We expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz), meaning its multi-thread performance is slightly better than that of the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 offers AVX512 support along with other improvements such as larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Otherwise, the 8745H has 16MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is also on board. Please note that the APU is not overclockable and cannot be replaced by the user. It is permanently soldered to the motherboard (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with a resolution of up to SUHD 4320p. Hardware encoding and hardware decoding of the most common video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC) is also no problem. As far as games are concerned, many titles can still be played in 1080p at the beginning of 2025, even if most settings are set to Low or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (standard TDP) of 35W to 54W, giving system manufacturers the choice of either improving battery life or making the system they are developing faster. In any case, an active cooling solution is a must for a notebook or mini PC equipped with this APU.

AMD Ryzen 7 H 255

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 H 255 is a chip from the Hawk Point family that is only available in China. The chip is identical to the older Ryzen 7 8745H and has 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) that run at up to 4.9 GHz, together with the still quite powerful Radeon 780M iGPU. An NPU for AI acceleration is not installed / activated.

The only difference between the 8745H and the 8745HS is the slightly higher standard wattage of the former, which may lead to slightly higher clock rates.

Performance

We expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz), meaning its multi-thread performance is slightly better than that of the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 offers AVX512 support along with other improvements such as larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Otherwise, the 8745H has 16MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is also on board. Please note that the APU is not overclockable and cannot be replaced by the user. It is permanently soldered to the motherboard (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with a resolution of up to SUHD 4320p. Hardware encoding and hardware decoding of the most common video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC) is also no problem. As far as games are concerned, many titles can still be played in 1080p at the beginning of 2025, even if most settings are set to Low or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (standard TDP) of 35W to 54W, giving system manufacturers the choice of either improving battery life or making the system they are developing faster. In any case, an active cooling solution is a must for a notebook or mini PC equipped with this APU.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 255AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
CodenameHawk Point-H (Zen 4)Hawk Point-H (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-H (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 8745H compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 255 « 3.8 - 4.95 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 2553.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745H compare3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2553.8 - 4.95 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 « 3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 4950 MHz3800 - 4900 MHz
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7r2/FP8FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)
NPU / AI16 TOPS INT816 TOPS INT8
Chip AI38 TOPS INT838 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 H 255
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points (52%)
min: 100.4     avg: 100.8     median: 100.8 (50%)     max: 101.1 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
962 Points (18%)
min: 905     avg: 914     median: 914 (17%)     max: 923 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
16876 Points (16%)
min: 15871     avg: 16137     median: 16136.5 (15%)     max: 16402 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1740 Points (71%)
min: 1697     avg: 1708     median: 1707.5 (69%)     max: 1718 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
678 Points (74%)
min: 660     avg: 669     median: 668.5 (73%)     max: 677 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6600 Points (16%)
min: 6255     avg: 6368     median: 6367.5 (16%)     max: 6480 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2655 Points (17%)
min: 2514     avg: 2551     median: 2551 (16%)     max: 2588 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
273 Points (76%)
min: 266     avg: 271     median: 271 (75%)     max: 276 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30.1 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (77%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7498 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
47919 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
88096 Points (56%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14463 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
103.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6974 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
71883 MIPS (41%)
min: 68893     avg: 69340     median: 69340 (40%)     max: 69787 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6467 MIPS (76%)
min: 6237     avg: 6249     median: 6249 (74%)     max: 6261 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
151.6 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
285 fps (7%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
21 fps (37%)
min: 19.9     avg: 20.2     median: 20.2 (35%)     max: 20.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15 GB/s (39%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
310 Seconds (4%)
min: 315     avg: 319.5     median: 319.5 (4%)     max: 324 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
190 Seconds (1%)
min: 194     avg: 198.5     median: 198.5 (1%)     max: 203 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.4587     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.503 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15474 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.3 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
84701 Points (65%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
22746 Points (56%)
min: 20839     avg: 21465     median: 21465 (53%)     max: 22091 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84245 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
84311 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85434 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20116 Points (51%)
min: 19827     avg: 19842     median: 19842 (50%)     max: 19857 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
26674 Points (48%)
min: 27094     avg: 27266     median: 27266 (49%)     max: 27438 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
11025 Points (46%)
min: 10169     avg: 10421     median: 10421 (44%)     max: 10673 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
2601 Points (60%)
min: 2545     avg: 2546     median: 2545.5 (59%)     max: 2546 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
12843 Points (50%)
min: 12515     avg: 12670     median: 12670 (49%)     max: 12825 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2507 Points (80%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12573 Points (52%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1921 Points (65%)
min: 1810     avg: 1845     median: 1845 (62%)     max: 1880 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
12267 Points (22%)
min: 11604     avg: 11609     median: 11609 (21%)     max: 11614 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1839 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12233 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7946 Points (79%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
49528 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
511 ms (1%)
min: 566     avg: 572     median: 571.5 (1%)     max: 577 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
236 Points (61%)
245 Points (64%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 290     avg: 295     median: 295 (53%)     max: 300 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1727 Points (65%)
min: 1769     avg: 1780     median: 1780 (67%)     max: 1791 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
86.8 Watt (15%)
min: 81.9     avg: 85.5     median: 85.5 (15%)     max: 89 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.1 Watt (16%)
min: 78.4     avg: 79.9     median: 79.9 (15%)     max: 81.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.9 Watt (4%)
min: 7.23     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (6%)     max: 10 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
29.8 Points per Watt (22%)
min: 30.9     avg: 32     median: 32 (24%)     max: 33 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 28. 05:19:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 20342 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19847 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1764303595s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Nov 2025 05:18:30 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 20342 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 20342 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19847 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 19847 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.02s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.021s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.022s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.022s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.023s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.024s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.024s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.025s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.026s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.026s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.026s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.027s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.027s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.027s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.027s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.028s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.028s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.028s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.029s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.03s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.03s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.031s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.031s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.032s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.032s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.033s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.034s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.035s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.036s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.036s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.037s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#51 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.039s

#52 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.039s

#53 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.04s

#54 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.04s

#55 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.041s

#56 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.041s

#57 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.042s

#58 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.042s

#59 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#60 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#61 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.043s

#62 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.044s

#63 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.045s

#64 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.046s

#65 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.046s

#66 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.047s

#67 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.048s

#68 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.048s

#69 return log +0.001s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)