Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS vs AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 6800HS

The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is a processor for big (gaming) laptops based of the Rembrandt generation. The R7 6800HS integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 3+ microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.2 (guaranteed base clock) to 4.7 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured on the modern 6 nm TSMC process. The HS variant offers a 10 W reduced TDP and therefore a lower sustained performance than the H version.

The new Zen 3+ is a refresh of the Zen 3 architecture and should not offer a lot of changes. The chip itself however, offers a lot of new features, like support for USB 4 (40 Gbps), PCI-E Gen 4, DDR5-4800MT/s or LPDDR5-6400MT/s, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth LE 5.2, DisplayPort 2, and AV1 decode.

A big novelty is the integrated GPU Radeon 680M, that is now based on the RDNA2 architecture and offers 12 CUs at up to 2.2 GHz. It should be the fastest iGPU at the time of announcement.

Performance

The average 6800HS in our database is in the same league as the Ryzen 7 5800H and also the Core i7-11800H, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is and how high the CPU power limits are.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP of 35 W (also known as the long-term power limit). Which is definitely too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The APU is built with TSMC's 6 nm process making for great, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 4900H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 4900H

The AMD Ryzen 9 4900H is a mobile SoC for big laptops based on the Renoir architecture. At the time of announcement in March 2020 it is the fastest model of the 4000H series. The R9 4900H integrates all eight cores based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture. They are clocked at 3.3 (guaranteed base clock) to  4.4 GHz (Turbo) and support SMT / Hyperthreading (16 threads). The chip is manufactured in the modern 7 nm process at TSMC and partly thanks to it AMD advertises a 2x improved performance per Watt for the Renoir chips

According to our information, the Ryzen 9 4900H is only slightly faster than the Ryzen 7 4800H. The CPU is clocked 400 MHz (base +14%) to 200 MHz (boost +5%) higher, but the gains greatly depend on the cooling and TDP settings. Compared to Intel chips, the i9-9980HK top model should be comparable. That means the Ryzen 9 4900H should be able to handle all demanding tasks and gaming.

In addition to the eight CPU cores, the APU also integrates a Radeon RX Vega 8 integrated graphics card with 8 CUs. The dual channel memory controller supports DDR4-3200 and energy efficient LPDDR4-4266 RAM. Furthermore, 12 MB level 3 cache can be found on the chip. See our hub page on the Renoir Processors for more information.

The TDP of the APU is specified at 45 Watt (default). That means the chip is intended for big and relatively heavy laptops.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 6800HSAMD Ryzen 9 4900H
CodenameRembrandt-HS (Zen 3+)Renoir-H (Zen 2)
SeriesAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Series: Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Renoir-H (Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS compare3.3 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS compare3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS « 3.2 - 4.7 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS compare3.3 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H « 3.3 - 4.4 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H compare2.9 - 4.2 GHz8 / 16 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H compare3 - 4 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
Clock3200 - 4700 MHz3300 - 4400 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cache16 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 168 / 16
TDP35 Watt45 Watt
Technology6 nm7 nm
max. Temp.95 °C105 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2FP6
FeaturesDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 680M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 1750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 6800HS
35.1 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 4900H
31.8 pt (53%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11992 Points (11%)
min: 11416     avg: 11604     median: 11604 (11%)     max: 11792 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1455 Points (61%)
min: 1290     avg: 1294     median: 1294 (54%)     max: 1298 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
570 Points (62%)
min: 482     avg: 493.5     median: 493.5 (54%)     max: 505 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4634 Points (11%)
min: 4233     avg: 4409     median: 4409 (11%)     max: 4585 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1987 Points (13%)
min: 1886     avg: 1927     median: 1926.5 (12%)     max: 1967 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
234 Points (65%)
min: 192     avg: 193     median: 193 (53%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
26.2 Points (34%)
23 Points (30%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (66%)
2.2 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6258 Points (38%)
5946 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41339 Points (30%)
40253 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
75070 Points (48%)
65380 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11833 Points (14%)
10173 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
82.9 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6716 Points (11%)
4297 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
56170 MIPS (32%)
48976 MIPS (28%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5495 MIPS (65%)
4727 MIPS (56%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
113.7 fps (38%)
111 fps (37%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
254.7 fps (59%)
215 fps (50%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
15.1 fps (27%)
12.9 fps (23%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.4 GB/s (30%)
7.4 GB/s (19%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
258 Seconds (2%)
247.3 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
0.6 sec (12%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13890 Points (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
9.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
20.1 s (1%)
24.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
711 s (3%)
729 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
68865 Points (53%)
64532 Points (50%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18829 Points (46%)
12199 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
74164 Points (60%)
63266 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
63416 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
69343 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
18745 Points (47%)
15719 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25588 Points (46%)
20613 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
10146 Points (43%)
6523 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1492 Points (58%)
min: 1230     avg: 1232     median: 1231.5 (48%)     max: 1233 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9298 Points (17%)
min: 7224     avg: 8012     median: 8012 (14%)     max: 8800 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1237 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7624 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6168 Points (62%)
5287 Points (53%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
36693 Points (37%)
28402 Points (28%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
618 ms (1%)
767 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
280 Points (50%)
227 Points (41%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.9 Watt (14%)
73.2 Watt (13%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83.6 Watt (15%)
105.3 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
18.1 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
23.8 Points per Watt (18%)
18.7 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 4900H → 87% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 25. 02:19:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14120 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11929 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753402797s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 23 Jul 2025 13:17:09 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14120 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 14120 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11929 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 11929 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)