Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia Quadro T2000 for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer desktop GTX 1650 Ti with comparable clock speeds and therefore currently between a mobile GTX 1650 and GTX 1660 Ti. The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC.

The GPU features 1024 shaders, 64 texture mapping units and 32 ROPs. The 4 GB GDDR5 memory is connected with a 128-bit memory interface and clocked at 2000 MHz. At a TGP of 60W, the clock speeds are specified from 1575 MHz (base) to 1785 MHz (boost).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), the T1000 and T2000 don not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU

The Nvidia T550 Laptop GPU (formerly known as Quadro T550 Mobile) for laptops is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). It is based on the consumer GeForce MX550 and features the same 1024 cores and a 64 Bit memory bus. The card offers 4 GB GDDR6 with a maximum bandwidth of 112 GB/s and no dedicated display outputs (iGPU display outputs used via Optimus). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. 

The professional GPUs offer certified drivers, which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospection, and visualizing applications). The performance in these areas is therefore much better compared to corresponding consumer GPUs.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal. In contrary to the faster Quadro RTX cards, the T550 does not feature raytracing and Tensor cores.

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
Quadro Turing Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameN19P-Q3TU117
ArchitectureTuringTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified1024 - unified
Core Speed1575 - 1785 (Boost) MHz1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed8000 MHz12000 effective = 1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5, GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption60 Watt25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP)
Transistors4.7 Billion
technology12 nm12 nm
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement27.05.2019 27.05.2022
Theoretical Performance7.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32
Memory Bandwidth112 GB/s
InformationOptimus only
Link to Manufacturer Pagenvdam.widen.net

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 2031     avg: 2187     median: 2066 (6%)     max: 2465 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1882     avg: 2021     median: 1928 (5%)     max: 2252 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 17399     avg: 17614     median: 17614 (19%)     max: 17829 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 32743     avg: 33219     median: 33218.5 (9%)     max: 33694 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 4559     avg: 4786     median: 4581 (8%)     max: 5218 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4816     avg: 5100     median: 4890 (6%)     max: 5593 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530     avg: 3590     median: 3589.5 (4%)     max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 13150     avg: 13271     median: 13271 (18%)     max: 13392 Points
min: 7405     avg: 8160     median: 8160 (11%)     max: 8915 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 13370     avg: 13524     median: 13523.5 (12%)     max: 13677 Points
min: 7432     avg: 8067     median: 8066.5 (7%)     max: 8701 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
25155 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24697 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
3DMark 06
31003 Points (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 278     avg: 282     median: 283 (42%)     max: 285 Seconds
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 256     avg: 263.3     median: 265 (99%)     max: 269 Seconds
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
106 fps (26%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
91.1 fps (13%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
43.9 fps (10%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
47.2 fps (13%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
101 fps (40%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
101 fps (17%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
111 fps (19%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
111 fps (30%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 95     avg: 98.8     median: 95.8 (26%)     max: 105.68 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
167 fps (19%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 95.8     avg: 101.7     median: 99.7 (11%)     max: 109.67 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
42.7 fps (9%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 24.8     avg: 26.1     median: 25.3 (6%)     max: 28.06 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
125 fps (14%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 77.5     avg: 82     median: 80.9 (9%)     max: 87.57 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
120 fps (18%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 82.4     avg: 86.2     median: 85.5 (13%)     max: 90.66 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
164 fps (18%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 104     avg: 110.4     median: 109 (12%)     max: 118.22 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
111 fps (19%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 61.6     avg: 63.7     median: 63 (11%)     max: 66.38 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 34.5     avg: 37.2     median: 36.2 (8%)     max: 40.74 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 11.7     avg: 12.4     median: 12 (4%)     max: 13.37 fps
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 46.3     avg: 54     median: 54.3 (11%)     max: 61.38 fps
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 84     avg: 99.4     median: 99.3 (16%)     max: 114.82 fps
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 13.5     avg: 15.6     median: 15.4 (16%)     max: 17.87 fps
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 86.9     avg: 98.2     median: 98.1 (14%)     max: 109.68 fps
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 10.6     avg: 12.1     median: 12 (10%)     max: 13.56 fps
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 44.5     avg: 46.2     median: 45.7 (23%)     max: 48.5 fps
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 22.4     avg: 25.6     median: 24.9 (16%)     max: 29.58 fps
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 28.3     avg: 30     median: 29.6 (13%)     max: 32.03 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
203 fps (12%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 184.9     avg: 193     median: 189.2 (11%)     max: 205 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
19 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
43.5 fps (3%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
118.3 fps (13%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
172.6 fps (4%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
229.9 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
449.9 fps (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5190 Points (6%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.2     avg: 34.7     median: 34.7 (5%)     max: 35.1 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.2     avg: 41.3     median: 41.3 (6%)     max: 41.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 42.9     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (10%)     max: 45.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.4393     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (44%)     max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.4734     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (40%)     max: 0.483 fps per Watt
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 38.2     avg: 40.4     median: 40.5 (65%)     max: 42.5 dB(A)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro T2000 (Laptop) → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 68% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
66.4 69.6 69.9 ~ 69 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
59.9 62 63 ~ 62 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
41.4 43.3 44.6 ~ 43 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
29.5 31 33.4 ~ 31 fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
151.1 152.7 156.6 ~ 153 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
70.7 74.4 75.4 ~ 74 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
56.5 59.5 59.9 ~ 59 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
36.1 36.8 37 ~ 37 fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
126.1 128 139 ~ 131 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
47.7 51 56 ~ 52 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
38.7 42 44 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
33.2 36 38 ~ 36 fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
75  fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
41  fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
38  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
35  fps
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
65.5 68.1 77.4 ~ 70 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
59.4 64.1 65.4 ~ 63 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
55.5 57 58.8 ~ 57 fps
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
60.2 60.7 65.7 ~ 62 fps
med. 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
30.5 30.5 31.2 ~ 31 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
22 22.2 22.3 ~ 22 fps
low 1280x720
T550 Laptop GPU:
111.4 113.3 126 ~ 117 fps
med. 1366x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
100.3 103.8 110.1 ~ 105 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
92.1 92.3 101.2 ~ 95 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
84 85.2 93.4 ~ 88 fps
low 1024x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
121 123 139 ~ 128 fps
med. 1366x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
19.6 19.9 23.2 ~ 21 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
106.2 116 127.2 ~ 116 fps
med. 1366x768
T550 Laptop GPU:
103.3 117.2 120.6 ~ 114 fps
high 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
61.5 61.6 63.9 ~ 62 fps
ultra 1920x1080
T550 Laptop GPU:
29 29.2 29.6 ~ 29 fps
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPUlowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2269624331
F1 2021153745937
Strange Brigade131524236
Far Cry 575413835
X-Plane 11.11706357
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark623122
Dota 2 Reborn1171059588
The Witcher 3128754121
GTA V1161146229
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


6
3

3
6
1
6
2
2
4
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 22:55:17

#0 checking url part for id 9858 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.117s ... 0.119s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.119s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.119s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9858 +0.027s ... 0.146s

#8 got single benchmarks 9858 +0.014s ... 0.16s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0.002s ... 0.163s

#10 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.018s ... 0.18s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.18s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.203s ... 0.383s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.383s

#14 Got 94 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.398s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.398s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.405s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.022s ... 0.427s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.427s

#19 return log +0.041s ... 0.468s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)