Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

► remove from comparison

Business graphics card based on the GeForce 8400M GS. Drivers and Bios are optimized for stability and business applications. The features are similar to the 8400M series.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

The NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M is an entry level graphics card for mobile workstations (laptops). It is based on the same core as the Quadro NVS 160M and the GeForce 9200M / 9300M GS. The drivers are optimized for OpenGL applications and professional 3D applications like CAD, DCC, and visualization applications. Furthermore, the drivers are certified to work with the most popular apps without problems.

The gaming performance is a bit below the similar 9200M / 9300M chip because of the professional drivers and therefore the GPU is only capable of displaying low end games fluently. Modern intensive 3D games wont run fluently or only with very low detail settings.

As the 9300M series, the Quadro FX 370M supports PureVideo HD to decode (HD) videos in the GPU.

The performance of the chip also depends on the used graphics memory. Either fast GDDR3 memory (clocked at 700 MHz) or slow GDDR2 (with 400MHz) can be used by the laptop manufacturer.

In the Dell Precision M2400, only GDDR2 graphics memory is used, leading to a slow performance (e.g. Doom3 - ultra 40fps). According to Dell the graphics card needs 20 Watt.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135MNVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro NVS 5100M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro NVS 320M compare 32 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 300M compare 8/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro NVS 140M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 160M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 150M compare 8 @ 0.53 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 135M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro NVS 130M compare 8 64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 120M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro NVS 110M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameG86MNB9M-GLM
Pipelines16 - unified8 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz580 MHz
Shader Speed800 MHz1450 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz700 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB256 MB
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption10 Watt20 Watt
Transistors210 Million
technology80 nm65 nm
FeaturesVGA, DVI, LVDS, HDTV, HDMI, max 2, nView, PCI-e 16x
Date of Announcement09.05.2007 15.08.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com
InformationOpenGL 2.1, max. 1920x1200 (digital) bzw 2048x1536 (analog), max. 2 unabhängige Displays, PCI-Express x16, optionale Interfaces (des Chips): DP, VGA, DVI, LVDS, HDMI

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
10100 Points (10%)
13622 Points (14%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
3570 Points (2%)
5532 Points (3%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
1900 Points (2%)
3290 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
3DMark 06
965 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
1595 Points (2%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
12.3 Points (26%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
16.8 Points (35%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
12 Points (25%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
27.3 Points (15%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
13.7 Points (27%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
21.8 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
6.8 Points (18%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
5.1 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
3031 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M → 157% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro FX 370M:
97  fps
med. 640x480
Quadro FX 370M:
97.1  fps
high 800x600
Quadro FX 370M:
65.4  fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro FX 370M:
39.9  fps
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom 39797.165.439.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1


1


1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 13. 16:40:24

#0 checking url part for id 211 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1054 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Jun 2024 05:35:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.114s ... 0.114s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.115s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.115s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 211 +0.04s ... 0.154s

#8 got single benchmarks 211 +0.007s ... 0.161s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1054 +0.002s ... 0.163s

#10 got single benchmarks 1054 +0.007s ... 0.17s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.17s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.118s ... 0.288s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.288s

#14 Got 4 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.29s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.29s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.29s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.293s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.293s

#19 return log +0.073s ... 0.365s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)