Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver N5030 vs Intel Celeron N3150

Intel Pentium Silver N5030

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium N5030

The Intel Pentium Silver N5030 is a quad-core SoC primarily for inexpensive notebooks and was announced late 2019. It runs at 1.1-3.1 GHz (Single Core Burst) and is based on the Gemini Lake platform. The 5030 is the refresh of the older Pentium 5000 and offers a 400 MHz higher Boost clock. Similar to the Apollo Lake predecessor, the chip is manufactured in a 14 nm process with FinFETs but offers slightly improved processor cores, double the amount of L2 cache, a smaller package, a better GPU architecture and a partly integrated WiFi support. Besides four CPU cores, the chip also includes a DirectX 12 capable GPU as well as a DDR4/LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel, up to 2400 MHz). The SoC is not replaceable as it is directly soldered to the mainboard.

Architecture

The processor architecture is still called Goldmont Plus. Compared to the older Goldmont cores in Apollo Lake, they feature an increased level 2 cache (to 4 MB). That means the per-clock-performance should be a bit better, but not near the Core CPUs like Kaby Lake Y.

Performance

The average N5030 in our database proves unable to beat the AMD 3020e, an entry-level dual-core CPU of similar power efficiency, in multi-thread performance, rendering the Pentium a poor option for anything but the most basic day-to-day activities, as of late 2022.

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 605 (Gemini Lake) is based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which supports DirectX 12 and is also used for the Kaby Lake / Skylake / Apollo Lake graphics adapters (like HD Graphics 520). Equipped with 18 EUs and a clock of up to 750 MHz, the performance should be roughly on par with the older HD Graphics 5300 and HD Graphics 505 (Apollo Lake).

The chip also includes an advanced video engine with hardware support for the playback of VP9 and H.265 material (8-bit color-depth).

Power consumption

Like most N-class Intel chips, the Pentium has a default TDP, also known as the long-term power limit, of 6 W. This is low and thus good enough for passively cooled tablets, laptops, mini-PCs and handhelds.

The Intel Pentium N5030 is built with one of the old 14 nm Intel processes making for poor, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

Intel Celeron N3150

► remove from comparison Intel N3150

The Intel Celeron N3150 is a quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks, which has been presented in early 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.08 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2930). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process may lead to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and therefore a somewhat higher performance in certain situations.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2930 (1.8 - 2.2 GHz) or the competing AMD APU E2-6110, the N3150 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for everyday tasks such as Internet browsing or office applications, but may struggle in more demanding software.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 640 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle demanding 3D games of 2015. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver N5030Intel Celeron N3150
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshBraswell
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Braswell
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 compare2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 « 1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3160 compare1.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3150 « 1.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 compare1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 compare1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3000 compare1.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1100 - 3100 MHz1600 - 2080 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP6 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA1090FCBGA1170
FeaturesDDR4-2400/LPDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 2, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, MPX, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SGXIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 640 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (200 - 750 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Pentium N5030
16.9 pt (28%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
911 Points (1%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
430 Points (18%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 171     avg: 182.5     median: 182.5 (20%)     max: 194 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 360     avg: 425.5     median: 425.5 (1%)     max: 491 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 203     avg: 226     median: 226 (1%)     max: 248.9 Points
118 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 75.8     avg: 80.9     median: 80.9 (22%)     max: 86 Points
32 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.1 Points (4%)
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2498 Points (15%)
1085 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7724 Points (6%)
3624 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
526 s (6%)
945 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.7 s (3%)
30.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1163 Points (2%)
915 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 6598     avg: 7238     median: 7238 (4%)     max: 7878 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2555     avg: 2645     median: 2645 (31%)     max: 2735 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.6 fps (6%)
9 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
84 fps (19%)
44.8 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
0.7 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N3150 +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N3150 +
0.2 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N3150 +
0.8 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 3319     avg: 3450     median: 3449.5 (24%)     max: 3580 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 1.402     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (31%)     max: 1.473 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
3895 Points (8%)
2053 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
24.9 s (5%)
41 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
55.9 s (2%)
90.2 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1247 s (6%)
1939 s (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2326     avg: 2377     median: 2377 (6%)     max: 2428 Points
1516 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
23701 Points (19%)
15395 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
23621 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 26682     avg: 31360     median: 31360 (25%)     max: 36038 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2155     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (6%)     max: 2210 Points
1311 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 3014     avg: 3209     median: 3209 (6%)     max: 3404 Points
1925 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
704 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2857 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
3123 Points (36%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 431     avg: 491.7     median: 512 (20%)     max: 532 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1039     avg: 1263     median: 1221 (2%)     max: 1529 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
356 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1177 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2176 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5662 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3150 +
2824 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3150 +
850 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N3150 +
2423 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N3150 +
2167 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N3150 +
3246 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N3150 +
3347 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N3150 +
2983 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1914     avg: 2410     median: 2170 (3%)     max: 3145 ms
7863 ms (9%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
355.8 ms (4%)
412.3 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 21894     avg: 21899     median: 21899 (16%)     max: 21904 Points
3963 Points (3%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 91.3     avg: 100.9     median: 95.4 (17%)     max: 116 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8984 Points (47%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
31170 Points (67%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9447 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13200 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 9.09     avg: 9.8     median: 9.8 (2%)     max: 10.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.98     avg: 8.8     median: 8.8 (2%)     max: 9.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 25.4     avg: 25.7     median: 25.7 (19%)     max: 25.9 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver N5030 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3150 → 54% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 17. 01:15:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11531 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6780 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755386135s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11531 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 11531 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6780 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 6780 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.034s ... 0.055s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)