The Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). It is the fastest Core 2 Duo P-model and the performance is comparable to the Core 2 Duo T9600. Still the TDP rating is considerably better (28 versus 35 Watt).
Due to the high clock speed, the P9700 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The P9700 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).
The Core 2 Duo P9700 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 → 100%n=12
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 83%n=12
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 22. 09:04:36
#0 checking url part for id 476 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 476 +0s ... 0.007s
#7 got single benchmarks 476 +0.008s ... 0.015s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0s ... 0.015s
#9 got single benchmarks 466 +0.012s ... 0.028s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.037s